Amazon Trees Gain Mass

Scientists do not know what is causing the increase in mass of Amazon trees during the past 20 years.  Oliver Phillips of the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom believes that the Amazon forests have become more massive, because the amount of Carbon they absorb from the atmosphere has increased.  This indicates that they are acting as a huge "carbon sink," and they are keeping some of the carbon they absorb. It was thought that trees released as much carbon as they absorbed.

The latter theory is not the only explanation for the growth of forest mass. Another theory says that there are more nutrients available because of human activities. Forest fires are releasing nitrogen into the atmosphere. Afterwards the nitrogen is absorbed by clouds and then returned to Earth as rain to fertilize the forests.

There is a third possibility obtained from research led by Stephen Pacala, an ecologist at Princeton University in New Jersey. He has studied a similar carbon-sink effect in the United States. He thinks this is the result of the re-growth of previously logged forests.

Let’s assume that the Amazon forests are gaining mass because of the carbon-sink effect, and then we should ask how long the effect will last. Researches have shown that this effect will last only a few years. The amount pf nitrogen limits the effect. A computer modeling study done recently by Peter Cox, a scientist at the Hadley Center for Climate Prediction in the United Kingdom, shows that as temperatures increases, forests would possibly dry out and become a reason of increasing the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere and not a reason of decreasing this amount as they are now.

References:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2001/12/1213_carbonsink.html
 

Studies Measure Capacity of "Carbon Sinks"

Scientists are getting a better idea of the amount of carbon that Earth's forests absorb from the atmosphere, acting as "carbon sinks." New research in this area will be very important in devising solutions to the global warming problem. Recent studies have found that more diverse plant ecosystems are better able to absorb carbon dioxide. When old growth forests like this one are clear cut, timber companies often replant the areas with a single tree species, a practice known as "monoculture," which reduces the biodiversity.
Scientists know that forests, crops, soils, and other organic matter absorb carbon, slowing down the rate of global warming. The results in calculating haw much carbon is absorbed differ.


Different Measuring Techniques

How much carbon is "stored" has been measured in two ways: one atmosphere based, the other land based.

1. Atmosphere based: measures concentrations of CO2 in the air when it is moving from point A to point B.

2. Land base: makes an inventory of all the carbon in a given area.  Then the variation of this amount is recorded.

The results of the atmospheric methods are similar to each other, and they have shown higher levels than the land based method. This was because in land based methods, only the amount of carbon in tress was taken in account. Now they took in account the carbon absorbed by landfills, soils, houses, etc. These results are now consistent with the atmosphere based method.

Reference:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2001/06/0621_carbonsinks.html