Welcome to Nina's Web Page for Mission 2006 at MIT!
Team 10: Socioeconomic, Economic and Finance Division
Team 10 Mission Statement:
 The Objectives of our group are the following:
       -Investigate and evaluate the socioeconomic  cost/benefit relationship of preserving the Amazon Basin.
       -Investigate and evaluate past regional development and its socioeconomic impact, applying these judgments to the Mission's
         proposed plan of sustainable development.
       -Develop strategies to maintain or improve local socioeconomic stability and counteract possible adjustments inherent to the Mission's
         plan.
       - Analyze the present economic status as well as possible ramifications of the project on the region, both on local and global contexts.
         Example of pertinent factors may include the effects of:
            --limitations on exported goods.
            --tourism related changes.
            --foreign economic intrusion into the region.
       -Analyze the present social conditions as well as possible ramifications of the projects on Amazonian society. Examples of pertinent
        factors may include:
             --The ethics of restrictive policies that limit the behavior of indigenous populations.
             --The cultural awareness of the project.
             --Forecasting the response of Amazonian society to the project.
       -Plan a budget for the project and allocate money to each aspect that requires funds.
       -Research into possible sources of funding for the project.
       -Determine to what extent preservation of the rainforest in its present state and/or controlled development of the region is socially and
         economically sustainable.
       -Collaborate with other teams at least once every two weeks to help maintain strategies that are economically and socially feasible.
       - Review and revise all of the other teams' plans  to verify social and economic feasibility; each team member will act as a liaison to at
         least one other team. 

General Facts About Brazil and the Amazon:
    BRAZIL (According to the CIA World Factbook-- http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/br.html):
         --natural resources: bauxite, gold, iron ore, manganese, nickel, phosphates, platinum, tin, uranium, petroleum, hydropower, and timber
         --agriculture: coffee, soybeans, wheat, rice, corn, sugarcane, cocoa, citrus, and beef
         --industries: textiles, shoes, chemicals, cement, lumber, iron ore, tin, steel, aircraft, motor vehicles and parts, machinery and equipment
         --population: approximately 174,468,575
         --estimated population growth for the year 2001: 0.91%
         --birth rate (2001): 18.45 births/ 1000 population
         --death rate (2001): 9.34 deaths/ 1000 population
         --infant mortality rate (2001): 36.96 deaths/ 1000 live births
         --life expectancy: 63.24 years
         --literacy rate: 83.3%
         --basic economic information:
                ~GDP (real growth rate--2000)= about 4.2%
                ~GDP per capita (2000)= about $6,500
                ~ as of 1990, approximately 17.4% of Brazil's population was below the poverty line
                ~ estimated unemployment rate in 2000= about 7.1%
                ~ external debt as of 2000= $232 billion
    Recent News on the Federative Republic of Brazil
         --Representing the Labor Party, leftist candidate for president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva received 46.4%  of the vote on
            Sunday, October 5 2002. He needed 50% of the vote to win the position, and participated in a run-off against Jose Serra,
            which was set to end on October 27.
             ~Lula was running on the platform of bringing social change to the country, and finding ways to create jobs for the impoverished
                people of Brazil. (As reported by Catherine Baldwin of the Washington Post)
             ~ Information about Lula's Party:
                 -Formed in 1980 as Brazil's first major socialist party
                 -The party is described as being composed of "trade unionists, intellectuals, Trotskyites, and church activists."
                        [information provided by BBC article: Lula: Fourth Time Lucky:
                       http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2367851.stm)
             ~Lula was also running on the platform of improving the economic status of jobless Brazilians-- this indicates that,
               if this platform is truly  the desired outcome the Mission project could potentially use the idea for creation
               of jobs as a basis for convincing the government to adopt the plan.
        --Lula da Silva won the October 27th runoff elections with 61% of the vote.
             ~ This marks the first leftist victory in Brazil in over 40 years.
        --Economic Updates:
              ~The value of the Brazilian real has been rapidly declining against the value of the US dollar. Many are
                   blaming the  problem on uncertainty due to the potential overhaul of government that will most
                   likely occur with Lula as president. (which was alreadly looking quite favorable in October,
                   according to a pre-election poll, which indicated that Silva had 60% of the vote versus
                   Jose Serra's 37%) [data obtained from Oct 16th release from the Associated Press].
              ~The IMF met with Lula in mid November to discuss issues involving their current loan package of
                $30 billion, and Brazil's $260 billion debt. According to an article from the BBC, "IMF Seeks Reassurance
                in Brazil", "there have been doubts over the Brazillian government's ability to remain solvent"
                (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/2441605.stm).
                    -This could be VERY crucial to all aspects of the Mission Projects. Most plans are assuming
                      that the goverrnment itself will adopt the plans. It thus follows that most plans are assuming
                      that the prime source of funding will be the government. This current economic instability
                      could have drastic consequences for the plan. Without a stable economy elsewhere in the country,
                      Lula, who's primary concern seems to be providing steady work for those in the laboring class,
                      will likely place Amazonian preservation at a lower level of importance. Thus, it is very important
                      that in proposal of the plan, Mission representatives emphasize that Amazonian preservation is
                      actually beneficial to the Brazilian government. Possible proposals may include:
                        (1) By improving the status of the forest, the resulting approval from other governments
                              would potentially lead to a renewed increase in foreign investment.
                        (2) Individual plans, especially those involving economic aspects such as sustainable farming and
                              more environment-friendly methodologies, can hopefully actually be proven to produce
                              even larger revenues than those that are currently comming out of the Amazonian economy.
                              Thus, the improved status of the Amazon could actually be a potential springboard
                              that provides the initial stimulus for economic productivity.


Interactions with Team 5 (Land):
   I have engaged in constant collaboration with the land team. We initially discussed the possibilities for overlap in our research, more specifically in the context of logging issues. We have come to the tentative conclusion that Team 10 will investigate the more human and economic aspects of land problems (i.e.. the loggers themselves, the people the loggers affect, and the economic issues surrounding logging), while Team 5 will investigate the specific land aspects of human intervention (in this case, the impact of the actual logging on the land).
  In subsequent collaboration with the land team, I have determined that there is actually very little overlap between the groups. The land group is specifically focusing on issues such as soil content and land degradation due to natural causes. The only prevalant possible overlap with the teams is that the land group may wish to imploy the use of indigenous groups within the Amazonian region to conduct actual soil sample tests. While the Brazillian government does not seem to have specific political restrictions on this kind of intervention, health and demarcation issuses, I believe that health and demarcation issues should be considered. As a representative from the socioeconomic/ economic group, I would propose that any entry into indigenous regions be closely monitored in terms of health aspects and possible intrusion issues. Specific diseases that might be involved would include malaria, yellow fever, and influenzia. Most indigenous groups have not built up immunity to these diseases, and thus would be substantially more suceptible to intrusion. Also, in terms of demarcation, I recommend, both based on issues of common sense and legality, that any analyst that enters an indigenous region receive approval from the community involved before accessing these samples.
   Update: Collaboration with the land team has diminished due to the recent readjustment of group status.... my current task is to develop a working plan for indigenous health care. Thus, my prior reccomendations for health concerns still stand. However, because the land group has been reassigned to tasks, I am no longer collaborating with them on associated socioeconomic and economic concerns.


Team assignment:
--In addition to my other research, I have been working on the following topic: What does Brazil think about its rainforests?  How important an issue
is this to urbanites?  Which demographic (squatters, commercial farmers, miners, loggers, etc.) have the biggest impact on the rainforest?
         I have uncovered the following information:
                    -In general, the Brazilian government tends to support preservation activity (at least on the political level)--
                        ~the government has it's own special division associated with Amazonian concerns
                        ~the government is the prime player in the SIPAM effort of Amazonian preservation
                        ~specific example= Amazonian "stamping program" in which all wood comming from the
                            Amazon must be stamped to determine that it came from a legal site
                            (see http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2515811.stm for more information)
                    -Many past efforts at Amazonian preservation have met with corruption. Money frequently disappears
                      from proposed project. A prime example is Sudam, a preservation program aimed at various small
                      preservation projects throughout the Amazon. Much of the half a million dollars proposed for the
                      program was allegedly stolen (see http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2193172.stm)
                    -Preservation efforts in the past have been met with opposition due to disputes over land rights of
                      the people currently residing in the proposed preservation areas.
                    -Brazilian groups which have been working towards effective preservation include the Brazilian
                      Environmental Institute, the Brazilian NGOs and Social Movement's Forum for Development
                      and Environment, Rede Brasil, and Amazon Working Group, and the Rubber-tappers' National
                      Council. Other preservation groups, among others, include SIPAM, FUNAI, Survival
                      International, and Socioambiental.
                    -Loggers/ timber companies , which make up a large part of the economy, generally claim that they
                      wish to monitor their own operations in  terms of preservation.
                    -Determining relative intensity of impact is difficult to determine, since most of the groups that cause
                      major disruption (illegal loggers, miners, etc.) are illegally performing the disruptive practices. Because
                      other groups seem to be handling these specific issues, as related to land, fauna, flora, etc, I have not looked
                      deeply into specific impacts associated with the region.
                    -An interesting article on this issue, and also the source of the preceding information, is located at
                    http://www.oneworld.org/ips2/jul98/04_46_004.html.
                    -A VERY important issue for Brazilian urbanites seems to be what is termed among this group
                      as internationalization of the Amazon.
                        ~This can be defined as the fear among countries that have the Amazon as part of their territory
                           that the world, and more specifically, America, is attempting to take control of the Amazon
                           by wresting control from the hands of associated countries and placing it, instead, in the hands
                           of their own so called preservation experts.---This is VERY VERY important for consideration
                           in ANY plans that Mission decides to adopt. We must remember that any plan we develop should
                           not be considered "our preservation plan," for the Amazon, but instead "our proposal" to the
                           Brazillian people and government.
                        ~For more specific information on this issue, see the following article from a Summer 2002 issue
                           of The Brazillianist entitled "The Internationalization of Amazonia". This is one of many many
                           references that I have found on the issue. It seems to be an incredibly prevalent concern amongst
                           a large proportion of Brazilians.


Group Focus: Preserving Lives and Culture of the Indigineous People:
-- Until now, the main focus of group 10 has been to collect data about the economic and socioeconmic status of Brazil and the Amazon for general background reading. The group has now decided that, in order to correlate our focus with the ultimate goal of the preservation of the Amazon, we will now adjust our focus to the preservation of culture and lifestyle of the indiginous people of the rainforest. I am currently doing extensive research on present known information about the more obscure indiginous groups. Also, I am looking into the potential for safe methods of entry into the rainforest, to analyze the situations of the indiginous groups first hand without disrupting either the rainforest or the health of these groups.
--UPDATE:  I have discovered the following information about the indiginous people of the Brazilian Rainforest:
    - Over 20 Million people inhabit the Amazon
    - The Amazon region contains about 400 different ethnic groups, and about 400 tribes with around one to one-and-a-half
       million people.
    - The main indiginous societies in the Brazilian Amazon (in order from greatest to least representation), are the
      Guarani, the Ticuna, the Kaingang, the Macuxi, the Guajajara, and the Yanomami. They mostly occupy the
      Brazilian states of Amazonas, Acre, Roraima, Rondonia, Mato Grosso, and Para.
    - The groups seem to be very dispersed and individualized. This will make it difficult for the project to analyze every single
      group. My suggestion is to focus on a few main regions of the Amazon, rather than to look very specifically at each
      individual group. In this way, the project can develop a generalized, regional plan for preservation on culture. Part of the
      plan can be to analyze the specific situation of each group as we enter each region. One major obstacle will be to actually
      determine how the leadership in each specific society is run. Based upon former contracts and issues with the indigenous
      people, it seems that it is difficult to identify specific groups simply due to the fact that the boundaries of leadership are
      so vauge. A group may think that they are making a deal with an entire indigenous society, when, in fact, they are only
      dealing with a leader from a subset of society. Because accurate boundaries are not well known, part of the Mission plan
      could be to actually enter these regions and attempt to accurately determine the socioecomic status of the indiginous lives.
      This analysis would most likely vary from region to region, depending upon terain, etc.
     -More detailed information about the indigenous people of the Brazilian Amazon can be found at:
       http://www.socioambiental.org/website/povind/indexenglish.htm
         (the above data comes from www.museudonindio.org.br/eng/cre/tema2.htm and www.ems.org/amazon/main.html)
--Specific Characteristics of Some indigenous groups in the Region (as found on the website for Survival International:
    http://www.survival-international.org/)
    - The Awa= With a recorded population of about 300, and noted as Brazil's "last truly nomadic tribe,"
      this group is located in the destructed regitons of the Eastern Amazon. They have suffered greatly
      from violent invasions and extermination attempts from ranchers and settlers. Many have sought
      refuge in villages provided by the government, while those that are still nomadic travel frequently,
      in bands of about twenty to thirty people. While a former World Bank loan program for Brazil
      had been contingent upon demarcation of Awa lands, as of yet, demarcation has not occurred and
      encroachment and resulting disease continue.
    -The Guarani= With a total South American population estimated at about 80,000, and a Brazillian
     population of around 30,000, this group is considered to be a major tribe in the Amazonian region.
     They are a very diverse group, with many subsets, but are joined by a common religion. Much of
      their land is plagued by encroachment by ranchers and plantation owners, and they are often employed
      as cheap labour by these individuals. A reported 320 of the Brazillian subset known as the
      Guarani-Kaiowa committed suicide between 1986 and the beginning of 2000.
    - The Yanomani= An estimated 27,000 Yanomani are located in the hills of the Amazon on the border
       between Brazil and Venezuela. They are considered the most numerous of indigenous forest groups,
        and have probably been in the Amazon region since the first people arrived there. They live in
       communal, ring-shaped houses of about 400 people, and rely on hunting, gathering, fishing, and
       farming for sustinance. They clear new gardens for farming about once every two to three years
        and grow about 60 crops (20 are fore food, the rest for medicine). They have benifited slightly
        from demarcation, but continue to be persecuted by encroaching miners. The following is
        a picture of a typical Yanomani home:

(courtesy of http://www.proyanomami.org.br/action.asp?cat=12)
    -The Makuxi= This group of around 24,000 people live on the boarder between Brazil and Guyana, in
       a diverse and beautiful region known as the "Guyana shield." Their habitat consists of mountains,
       tropical forests, and savannahs, in which they experience a distinctive dry summer and rainy winter.
       They suffer threats from farmers, ranchers, and, most recently, the Brazilian army, which is attempting
        to militarize the region.

Group Discovery: SIVAM and SIPAM
-- Group 10 recently discovered a few projects in place in Brazil which are already working towards preservation of the Amazon. They are:
1. SIVAM: System for the Vigilance of the Amazon-- project instituted primarily by the Raytheon corporation in 1990 and announced to world leaders at a conference in Rio in 1992. The Raytheon group is specifically developing aircraft and other surveillance data that, according to the group are set to achieve the following goals: "environmental protection, control of land occupation and usage, economical and ecological zoning, updating of maps, prevention and control of epidemics, protection of the indigenous populations, surveillance and control of the borders, monitoring of river navigation and forest fires, identification of illegal activities, air traffic control, and surveillance for cooperative and non-cooperative aircraft. " (Raytheon Group Report, "Raytheon Plays a Key Role in the Government of Brazil's System for the Vigilance of the Amazon (SIVAM).
-----my notes: while it seems that this project could be promising, in terms of sharing data, or even combining forces for the Mission Project, it will be necessary to further investigate the actual progress of SIVAM. According to data published by American Univeristy (http://www.american.edu/TED/SIVAM.HTM ), the major focus of the project seems to actually be geared towards drug enforcement, rather than analysis for preservation. However, the project is intriguing,
-----see the Raytheon website, at www.raytheon.com, for more information
2. SIPAM: Systerm for the Protection of the Amazon (SIPAM)-- According to a translated version of the official SIPAM site, "The SIPAM represents the beginning of a new process of discovery and occupation of the Amazônia, that if bases on the integration of information and knowledge, with sights to the sustainable development and the preservation of the region for the future generations. " This government-led preservation project declares its goal to be that of "sustainable development" of the Amazon region. It seems to be an umbrella plan, encompassing many projects, including SIVAM. The Portugese site for the project is located at http://www.sipam.gov.br/.
-----my notes: This project seems to be much more interesting, and most likely much more relevant to the Mission Plan. Any plan that we institute will require us to take current actions into consideration, so that we are sure that our plan is actually productive, and not repetitive of other projects.


My New Task: Indigenous Health Care Plan for the Amazon:

---I have now been assigned to "group i" with the task of developing a heatlhcare plan for the indigenous people of
   the Brazillian Amazon.
--I discovered a very interesting case study on Amazonian Health. It is an article by Mary Elizabeth Reed, in the
   Medical Anthropology Quarterly (sited below). Reed visited a specific tribe in the sothern Amazon, and interviewed
   vaious members about specific health concerns that they faced. This article seems to indicate that the biggest
   issue for Amazonian indigenous groups is not necessarily availability of health-related services, but instead
   accessiblility of these services. Thus, I am working on a plan that will be geared mostly towards providing
   acessible care to the region. Hopefully, I will also be able to formulate a plan that provides the least disruption of
   the Amazonian ecology.
--I have found a few sites that indicate that the government is actually strongly involved in attempting to solve
  indigenous health issues. Information is rather confusing, because control over specifically health care has shifted
  hands many times. However, from what I can gather, indigenous health care, which was formerly under control
  of the group FUNAI (www.funai.gov.br/), is now under the auspices of the main government health branch, known
  as the Ministry of Health.
--I've been busy =) --- here's my plan:
Nina's* Healthcare plan [*first four paragraphs of background courtesy of Christina Huang-- the rest is mine =) ]
Project OPNAH: Organization for the Protection of Native Amazonian Health
    I. Problems:
        a. Serious diseases and illnesses afflict indigenous groups of the Amazon.
        b. Many Amazonian Indigenous groups lack affordable health care.
        c. Some indigenous people lack adequate modern health care education.
        d. Indigenous people often lack access to basic health care supplies.
        e. The actual health status of indigenous groups in many areas of the Amazon is undefined.
        f . Known indigenous groups are currently at varying levels in terms of healthcare needs.
        g. Current aid programs are helpful, but for the most part, not widespread, and rather disjointed.

    II. Plan: Mission 2006 recommends setting up an experimental independent organization, backed by funds from both the
        government and other aid organizations, responsible for combating the problem through the following tasks:
        a. Setting up accessible humanitarian healthcare and health education
        b. Sending task forces into indigenous territories to investigate need on a case-by-case basis.
        c. Collaborating with the many current aid projects/ organizations currently situated in the region, in an attempt
            to create a more cohesive method of aid.

    III. Background:

    The indigenous people of Brazilian Amazon Rainforest are an integral part of the region, having lived there for thousands of years. In addition to being an intrinsic characteristic of the forest itself, they also represent the greatest source of knowledge of the region. For example, many believe that indigenous people may have incredible knowledge about Amazonian vegetation, including possible medicinal properties that might, in fact, be so strong, that they contain the key to curing such diseases as cancer.  Unfortunately, however, many Amazonian indigenous groups are at risk of extinction if the necessary attention is not provided. The people are afflicted with a variety of severe diseases including typhoid, dysentery, influenza, malaria, dengue, minimata, tuberculosis, yellow fever, and measles. Without proper treatment, many of these diseases have fatal consequences, and, much of the time, adequate treatment does not reach these groups. Brazil’s indigenous will eventually perish if the proper actions to protect them from disease are not administered.
    There are multiple causes for the indigenous health crisis. The diseases were first introduced to the indigenous people through the influx of foreigners from Europe and Africa in the 1500s when Brazil was “discovered.” As intrusion into the forest has continued, logging practices have also contributed to the propagation of disease. Minimata disease, for example, affects the nervous system causing uncontrollable shaking, muscle wasting and birth defects. The disease is produced by methyl mercury poisoning, a toxic substance used to separate gold and ore.   In a recently performed study, thirty percent of small-scale Brazilian gold miners, referred to as “garimperos” had mercury levels in their body above the World Organization’s standards.  Mining processes have produced other health risks as well. In addition to methyl mercury, cyanide released by large-scale mining companies also serves as health risks to indigenous groups. The seriousness of the issue can be demonstrated by the1980s discovery of gold in the northern Brazilian state of Roraima. According to Survival International, a London?based indigenous support group, within seven years of contact, 20% of the Yanomani population of the Roraima died from contact-related illness and disease.
    More indirect health problems have also resulted from contact with outsiders: particularly missionaries, rubber extractors, gold miners and logging companies. When these foreigners exchanged goods for cheap labor, the indigenous habituated to the commodities they supplied. As this reliance developed, it proved harmful to cultural practices, and, in turn, to the health status of afflicted tribes. The Katukina tribe, who inhabit the flood land area of the upper Amazonian region, for example, succumbed to high levels of malnutrition, anemia and vitamin deficiencies as males began to work away from the villages to attain these industrialized supplies.   As a result, malaria, measles, and influenza outbreaks have afflicted the Katukina tribe.
    The indigenous people are especially vulnerable to disease because of their aboriginal tendencies. According to the Pan American Health Organization, the tuberculosis rate was ten times Brazil’s national average. In 1996, malaria was determined to be the main cause of death, and infant mortality rates were three times the national average. The situation is not irreversible. Within one year of intensive prevention and treatment programs, child mortality dropped by sixty percent and deaths from diseases (malaria and TB) diminished by half.   However, as displayed in the following map, based on data collected in 2002, the risk of malarial infection is still high, and there is still work to be done:

(Courtesy of the Pan American Health Organization)
Health care thus continues to be extremely valuable in saving many from suffering.
    Basic health care in most regions of the Amazon is performed within the tribes themselves. Societies typically rely on the traditional medical practices of each individual tribe as their prime source of care. This is partly due to the fact that many of these communities, such as that in the Ilhas de Abaetetuba region of the Amazon estuary, suffer from the effects of a “boombust economy.” In this situation, a large influx of immigration is followed by a slow or even stalled economy, in which health resources frequently become scarce and expensive (3, Reeve).  The second, and perhaps more distinctive problem, seems to be the fact that effective healthcare is often too distant. In Reeve’s study, out of 80 individuals interviewed from the Illhas de Abaetetua region, the most common response to the question of seeking medical exams in clinics was that this method of healthcare was only used as a last resort. (5) Another common sentiment among those interviewed was the fact that traditional treatment worked better because of the faith that the natives are able to have in its powers. Thus, in creating any health care plan to aid in indigenous life, it is incredibly important to integrate traditional beliefs and practices with any western treatment.
    The current key players in providing additional healthcare to the region are the government funded, non-profit organizations, the Brazilian government itself, and other non-affiliated humanitarian groups. One notable government-funded group is URIHI, a non-profit group set up to provide health services to remote Yanomani communities (the term means “forest” in the Yanomani language). According to a report in OneWorld US, by Alison Raphael, the group was successful after it’s first year, with child mortality dropping by 60% and adult death from local diseases dropping by half (http://forests.org/articles/reader.asp?linkid=7117). This smaller scale effort geared towards the Yanomani people seems to indicate that a large scale, widespread, and sustained effort at disease eradication would indeed prove successful.
    The Brazilian government also has its own indigenous health policy. While formerly controlled by the National Health Foundation (Funasa), as of early 2002, the policy came under the direction of The Indigenous Health system and the Federal Agency for Disease Prevention and Control (APEC) (http://www.brazzil.com/p07mar02.htm).  In the past, the Brazilian government has stepped up efforts to control the spread of serious diseases in the Amazon region.  According to a report by the World Health Organization, as of 2001, Brazil increased funding for national disease control in the Amazon to $54 million US dollars. That year, the number of cases of malaria in the Brazilian Amazon dropped 43%, from 420,000 in the first eight months to 237,0000 (1171, World Health org). Again, this example seems to support the correlation between humanitarian aid and widespread health improvement.  However, Brazilian government funding for indigenous groups still seems to be disproportionate to that of the rest of the population. According to a report by the United Nations Association for Great Britain and Northern Ireland (UNA-UK), the annual amount spent by the Brazilian government on indigenous health care is about R$22 per capita, versus the R$100 per capita Brazilian average (http://www.una-uk.org/brazil2.html).
    A major humanitarian organization that works with various indigenous concerns, including health care, is Operação Amazônia Nativa (OPAN). This organization was founded in 1969 and works in the northern and central-western areas of Brazil (http://www.una-uk.org/brazil2.html). The organization sends groups of four specialized individuals, one of which oversees health concerns, into a region or society to work on small projects. They are currently working on five projects in the Amazon, and former material and health aid seems to have provided success for individual tribes involved. However, while the organization does seem to be a valuable asset to health care concerns, its major focus seems to be more on general indigenous rights than on specific health problems. Thus, the project seems to be a good starting point for health issues, but does not represent a comprehensive health plan for the Amazonian indigenous groups.
    The major problems associated with these formerly instituted plans seem to be first, in a lack of sustained dedication to the effort and second, in a scope that is too narrow for substantial health recovery. The Mission 2006 Plan aims to amend these problems, while still maintaining the successful aspects of the current health plans.


    IV. Procedure: Project OPNAH
        a. Presentation of OPNAH to the public (about 5 mo.): OPNAH representatives will present
            plans to representatives from various affiliated groups, including:
            1. Brazilian government
            2. Brazilian organizations: including OPAM and URIHI
            3. Other organizations: including the World Bank, the UN, the Pan-American Health Organization,
                and other health oriented groups (This includes visiting small aid groups already in the region for additional
                input.)
            4. Indigenous groups of the Amazon: This involves entry into the region to speak with indigenous people about
               resources that will be offered through the plan. *Note: all services offered will be completely optional and will
               be provided on a case by case basis depending upon both need and desire for aid* Groups will be asked for input
               on other possible needs. Indigenous groups can include, but are not limited to the Guarni, Caingang, Ticuna,
               Terena, Guajajara, Xavante, Yanomami, Macuxi, Potiguara, Xacriaba, Fulni-o, Canipuna, Pata xo, Macuxi,
               Kuikuru, Baniwa, Mekranoti Kapo, Txu Kahamae, Arapaco, Wari, and Uru-Eu-Wau-Wau tribes.
        b. Initial Analysis for permanent clinic sites (about 5 mo): OPNAH representatives enter the Amazonian region and
            do extensive research and investigation into location sites of each of six clinics scattered throughout the
            Amazonian state of Amazonas, which has been chosen because of its large indigenous population and central
            location. Factors in choosing site locations for the clinics will include:
            1. Accessibility:
                (a) These clinics will also act as supply centers to the region. Thus, accessibility to more
                    modernized areas without disruption of the external environment is a must.
                (b) An optimal region will provide easy access to as many needy indigenous groups as
                     possible. *Note: This is a need-based plan. For those rare groups that have ready access to medical
                     care, the service should not be necessary at such a strong level. *
            2. Disruption: OPNAH representatives must analyze each region for possibilities of environmental disruption
                associated with construction.
            3. Overall viability: OPNAH representative will analyze the practicality of putting a base station in each
               considered location. Also, the OPNAH will be responsible for determining a location that is near
               indigenous groups that actually want aid.
        c. ALSO IN YEAR ONE: Recruitment and Remote Aid:
            1. Representatives that are sent to interview indigenous groups as part of the Presentation aspect of
                the plan will also be doctors. They will come with enough supplies for approximately one year, and
                will supply remote aid to each group that they visit.
            2. Recruitment: Approximately four doctors will be required for each of the main clinics, with as many
                additional volunteer medical workers and doctors as possible. Optimally, most doctors will be Brazilian,
                and have a firm background in any indigenous languages necessary. One doctor and one health
                volunteer will also be hired for six mobile clinics working out of each stationary clinic
                (outlined in more detail later).  Volunteers can work over intervals of 2 months,
                6 months, or 1 year. Some volunteers can work through programs similar to that in the
                United States, which gives free medical school tuition in return of service.
        d.  Construction: (approximately one year)
            1. Two OPNAH clinics will be constructed in what is determined to be the most urgent of the six
                predetermined possible locations. Funding will potentially come from government funds already
                designated for indigenous health, and/or from funds from other organizations that have been
                contacted during Presentation.
        e. Implementation: (approximately three years): OPNAH will provide services to afflicted tribes,
            working out of the predetermined clinics.  A board of directors comprised of medical representatives
            from each clinic, who will collaborate at least once a month, to determine necessary changes to
            the project, and discuss other problems that arise, will oversee the program. OPNAH will provide
            the following optional services:
            1. Basic health care provided at the clinic
            2. “Ambulance service” provided by the clinic, with communication provided through the
                SIVAM network. This will consist of basic transport services for the following uses:
                (a) Transport to the clinic, based upon determined need from representatives
                        from the “mobile clinic”
                (b) Transport to more strongly equipped health care facilities for severe cases
            3.  “Mobile clinic” made up of two to three people (at least one doctor and one health representative)
                sent to each group on a regular/ non-regular basis (depending upon the desires of the group),
                to provide the following services:
                (a) Basic medical care: for injuries and minor illnesses
                (b) Basic medical education: offered to both the indigenous people as a whole and specifically
                    to traditional healers that can incorporate modern methods into traditional beliefs and methods
                (c)  Hygienic improvements, such as a water filtration system, gradually installed at the request of
                    the tribe (assuming proper funding is attained).
   *** Note: because all services are optional, each indigenous tribe can choose to receive as many or as few of these services provided ****
    f. Review Period: (approximately two months)
        1. A review board, made up of representatives from both the OPNAH organization itself, and
            from affiliated groups (such as key donors, and the Brazilian government), will analyze the
            success of the first three years of the project. Modifications to the plan would be made, based
            upon problems or successes discovered.
        2. Implementation continues.
    g. Expansion:  (approximately eight years—and beyond for future implementation in other states)
        1. Assuming success of the review period, the OPNAH will enter into its second four year
           Construction/Implementation phase for two more clinics. This will be followed by another
           review period, and, hopefully, the third and final four-year phase and two month review. While
           the new projects are implemented, old ones will continue, and mature with changing needs.
        2. Assuming success of the project in the state of Amazonas, the project can be expanded into other
            states, and ultimately become a rainforest-wide organization.
        3. With increased credibility, OPNAH will begin to lobby for improved enforcement for health
            regulations on those entering the region.
    h. Program Continues: (indefinite—until stability is reached)
        1. A two month analysis of the OPNAH plan will continue every three years
    i. Gradual Reduction of Funding will occur as self-sustainability is attained
        1. As the indigenous population improves both in numbers and in stability of health, the demands
            for resources will gradually decrease and funding can be pulled back. With many years of health
            education provided, tribes will hopefully develop methods of self-sustainable health care and only
            need basic resources, such as vaccinations and medications. Also, with improved health, indigenous
            groups will be more able to support themselves in terms of nutrition and other basic necessities.
            Thus, to some extent, good health can be self-sustainable.

V. Tools and Requirements:
    a. Manpower:
        1. Approximately 24 doctors—four per base station (at first, with
            subsequent review periods determining actual requirements)
        2. At least thirty volunteer workers
    b. Funding
        1. Possible Sources of Funding Include: Current government finances directed towards
            indigenous health care (disease control funding was a reported $54 million US in 2001),
            OPAM, the World Bank, the Pan-American Health Organization, the UN, URIHI, and
            FUNAI (the National Indian Foundation of Brazil)
        2. Projected costs:
            (a) $600,000 for clinics ($100,000 per clinic)
            (b) In first year (very rough estimates):
                 $ 200,000   -- for 2 clinics
                 $ 300,000   -- manpower
                $1,500,000 -- supplies (medication, bandages, etc.)
                 $ 300,000   -- running clinics (energy costs, etc.)
                 $   50,000   -- travel (initial analysis, remote region travel, etc.)
                  --------------
                  $2,350,000 -- estimated total cost

VI. Testing

    To later test the progress and success of the project, a survey group will initially investigate the actual status of the Amazonian region. This will incorporate two main facets. The first is detailed investigation into current information on the status of indigenous groups. Much of this has already been performed through the Mission plan. The second will be physical entry into the region, for purposes of further investigation. This second facet will incorporate interviews, surveys, and gathering of current statistical data. With this information, the OPNAH will then establish a baseline report on the status of indigenous health.
    Future testing will then incorporate specific short term and long-term aspects. For short-term analysis, OPNAH will send review panels into each base station region to determine how health has improved, and what specific changes need to be made. These panels will also include members from other affiliated organizations, including, but not limited to, benefactors and indigenous tribe members. Long-term indicators of success include overall marked improved health of indigenous people, and a rising population of indigenous groups.
Specific tests to determine the efficacy will include:
a. Interviewing indigenous people to determine changing health concerns
  based on increasing and decreasing levels of complaint, and based on:
   1. Their views on how the system helps
   2. Their specific health concerns (which diseases seem to be more
      controlled, and which seem to be causing greater affliction)
   3. Their views on problems with the system
       b. Constant analysis of available government statistics on number of health and disease cases
       c. Analysis of changing productivity levels of indigenous groups as the project proceeds
      d. Analysis to determine if indigenous groups that initially refused aid begin to ask for it
      e. Conducting regular statistical analysis of diseases present, diseases treated, live birth
         rates, illness-related deaths, and number of cases of serious illness


VII. Expected Results:

    If the plan is successful, analysis will reveal a marked decrease in major diseases within the Amazon rainforest region. Based upon the results of past health care efforts (specifically the URIHI plan), a decrease of at least 50% in child mortality and adult death from local diseases would represent adequate improvement in health of the region, and general success of the OPNAH. Complete success would occur with complete eradication of the major local diseases, such as malaria and measles.  Also, with complete success of the program, adequate hygiene devices would be provided to every community that wanted it. Finally, if this project is successful, within approximately 15 years, health will have improved to the point that funding to the plan can be safely decreased over time.


VIII. Externalities:

A major obstacle for this plan could be convincing the indigenous people that this aid is indeed useful. From previous analysis and research in the region, it has been determined that many tribes, despite their illnesses, simply wish to be left alone. Because the OPNAH program would be completely optional, it would not encroach upon these wishes. However, this also means that it might be difficult to provide widespread aid to the region.
Another obstacle within the region could be that of internal corruption. While a consistent review board would possibly be able to curb these trends, the possibility for corruption would still exist, and again, might provide an obstacle to program implementation.


By  Nina DeBenedictis =)
 

Non-website source:
Reeve, Mary-Elizabeth. Medical Anthropology  Quarterly  v. 14 no 1, Mar. 2000, p. 96-108



Good Books For Background Information on Brazillian and Amazonian Issues:

Alston, Lee J., Gary D. Livecap, and Bernardo Mueller. Titles, Conflict, and Land Use. The University of Michigan Press. Ann Arbor, MI, 1999.

Barham, Bradford L. and Oliver T. Coomes. Prosperity's Promise: The Amazon Rubber Boom and Distorted Economic Development. Westview Press.
    Boulder, Colorado. 1996.

Blaikie, Piers and Harold Brookfield. Land Degradation and Society. Methuen & Co. Ltd. New York. 1987.

Healy, Kevin. Llamas, Weavings, and Organic Chocolate: Multicultural Grassroots Development in the Andes and Amazon of Bolivia. University of
    Notre Dame Press. Notre Dame, Indiana. 2001.

Hemming, John. Change in the Amazon Basin Volume I: Man's Impact on Forests and Rivers. Manchester University Press. Dover, New Hampshire. 1985.

Hemming, John. Change in the Amazon Basin Volume II: The Frontier After a Decade of Colonisation. Manchester University Press. Dover, New
    Hampshire. 1985.

Smith, T. Lynn. Brazil: People and Institutions. 4th ed. Louisiana State University Press. Baton Rouge Louisiana. 1972.


Check out our Team Web Site for more information or
See what's happening at MIT

Contact me at: ninald@mit.edu