Significance of bryophytes and lichens in arctic coastal plain
 
 Introduction
 
 In the whole Alaskan arctic region, bryophytes (commonly known as "mosses") 
and lichens are shown to be important in the tundra communities in terms of
their cover, production and phytomass. They are generally not freely consumed 
by herbivores, though they are the main producers in the tundra region; many 
mosses are slow to decompose, resulting in high phytomass to production ratios 
indicative of slow turnover. The accumulating bryophyte phytomass has high 
thermal insulating, water-holding and cation exchange capacities. Thus, it 
exerts a powerful influence on soil temperature and water regimes and on nutrient
cycling, and it forms a carbon sink of significance in terms of global warming.
Main species of mosses are Aulacomnium, Sphagnum,Tomenthypnum spp.,
and main species of lichens are Cladonia, Peltigera, Cetraria spp..
(Sarah J. Woodin & Mick Marquiss, 1997)
 
 Bryophytes and lichens constitute a large part of the total biomass of present-day
 tundras, and in Rangifer distribution areas the latter are an important
part  of the food web.  They are important in the structure and function
of the ecosystems because of their effects as insulators and filters.  
Their insulating properties is partly from increased reflectance and partly 
from the numerous air pore space when dry.”  The soil under bryophyte 
and lichen mats tends to be cold and moist.  Lichens and mosses affect 
nutrient cycling of the ecosystem by intercepting aerial deposition and leaching 
from dripping aboveground vascular plant parts. (Cowles, 1984; Rosswall and 
Granhall, 1980) Lichens with cyanobacterial symbionts and bryophytes with 
cyanobacterial associations provide the main input of nitrogen into the ecosystem. 
(Alexander et al., 1978; Baselier et al., 1978,; Kallio, 1975)
 
 Mosses contribute significantly to above-ground production and phytomass 
in the region. In the extensive, relatively dry tussock tundra in Alaska, 
the production of mosses is around 70gm-2 but in the wetter areas, as near 
the arctic coastal plain, the production can be as high as 164gm-2, because 
moss production generally increases with water availability and marine shore 
is usually more plentiful in nutrients. Lichens are generally less productive 
than mosses, but they contribute substantial phytomass in lichen heaths and 
woodlands. (Sarah J. Woodin & Mick Marquiss, 1997)
 
  
 
 Lichens on the arctic coastal plain
 Photo: Subhankar Banerjee
 
 Factors for their success - an analysis on their physiology
 
 There are several factors responsibles for the success of mosses and lichens 
in Alaskan region. The two groups are remarkably similar in attributes beneficial 
in severe environments. Both tend to occupy and create relatively favourable 
microenvironments. Many species exhibit a broad response of net assimilation 
rate to temperature, with maxima at 10-15oC but with positive net assimilation 
and dark respiration continuing at or below 0oC. Light compensation and saturation 
intensities are typically lower in mosses and lichens than in vascular plants, 
and compensation levels decrease with temperature permitting positive net 
assimilation under cool, low-light conditions. (Sarah J. Woodin & Mick 
Marquiss, 1997)
 
 Moreover, most species have little access to soil moisture and lack an effective 
cuticle; this enables them to absorb water through much of their surface but
results in rapid water loss under drying conditions. Yet, though the plants
become inactive when dry, they resume normal metabolism rapidly on remoistening.
Thus, mosses and lichens are thus adapted to switching rapidly between periods
of metabolic activity and rest, utilizing favourable conditions whenever
they occur. This may be facilitated by micromorphological features thought
to facilitate simultaneous uptake by moss leaves of both water and carbon
dioxide. They also resist frost very well by conferring tolerance of cytoplasmic
dehydration resulting from extracellullar ice formation. (Sarah J. Woodin
& Mick Marquiss, 1997)
 
 Reference:
 1.    Sarah J. Woodin & Mick Marquiss. (1997). 
Ecology of Arctic Environment, under the article: Longton, Royce E.
(1997). The role of bryophytes and lichens in polar ecosystems