To view the ideas presented by a team section and to provide feedback, click on the links below. Each idea will be reviewed in detail by at least 3 different course staff members.

If you missed the presentations please be sure to watch the presentation videos linked above. If you were not able to make class on Friday it may be worth looking at the class notes (.pdf) for overall feedback on the presentations.

While there was some good work, on the whole the presentations were weak compared to other years of the class.

A 5 tier rank order based on the ideas, models, research and presentation effectiveness is below. The rank order is based on the consensus of 17 course staff members and mentors, resulting from a 2 hour discussion after the sketch model review. The error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean.

The purpose of ranking is to provide overall feedback that can be used to improve our projects... we want to use the review as a learning opportunity. It is not used for the sketch model grade, which is determined by your lab instructor.

It is worth looking at the higher ranked projects and thinking about what went well. If your project has a lower ranking, it may mean the idea was not clearly presented, there were gaps in research, or that there were either concerns or misunderstandings about the idea.

Overall impression of course staff, rank ordering (1 is highest)