2.009 Product Engineering Processes

Technical Review

background, review elements, grading, logistics, results

Background
The goal of the technical review is to inform instructors about the state of your functional, final prototype and to obtain critical feedback. This feedback will help you prioritize improvements for the final presentation. The exercise will help you learn how to factually present a product prototype to colleagues in a professional working context and obtain design feedback.

The review will be held during the evening, as indicated in the class schedule. Examples from prior technical reviews are on the right. You can also view projects from other years in the gallery (select a project and the click on the technical review tab). The communication instructors have also prepared some useful guidelines for effective technical review demonstrations.

Key review elements
The review is an informal, interactive prototype demonstration. Think of it as a mostly show (demonstration), not tell, presentation. Be ready to have reviewers using your prototype.

Instructors will work in teams so that you will demonstrate for 15 minutes, have 15 minutes off, and then demonstrate again to a different pair of instructors. In total you will have four 15 minute demo sessions.

Grading
The review contributes to a portion of your shared team-wide grade and all course instructors will participate in the review process.

This is a technical design review, so important aspects that will be considered include:

  • Mechanical design details
  • Human factors/form/aesthetics
  • System integration
  • Details/prototype execution/manufacturing
  • Performance quality/safety/reliability

Instructors and mentors will attend the review and will meet immediately following to discuss each prototype, but your team instructors will determine your final grade.

After you have received written feedback via email from instructors, complete your milestone reflection in your design notebook.



 

Logistics
Before the review, the review, after the review

Before the review
If a special arrangements are needed to demonstrate your prototype, please let the course instructor know no later than Tuesday evening before the review. The schedule below also indicates where your demonstrations will be located.

You should have a large poster that clearly highlights critical functional specifications (from your product contract). You can schedule a time for help with plotting on Wednesday evening.

Be prepared to let the reviewers use your prototype. During the evening, your team will also be asked to give a 5 minute demonstration to be recorded for the website. Your team should plan and practice this demonstration in advance of the review as the video will be used for reference when instructors and mentors write feedback for your team. Use the video as an opportunity to explain and demonstrate your product. The video will be what reviewers what when writing feedback for your team.

Work on the machine shop side of the lab will cease at 4:45 PM, but you will have shop access through to 7 PM. Dinner will be available in the lab at 6 PM.

The review
The review will be in the Pappalardo lab from 7-9:35 PM on the date indicated in the course schedule.

Instructors and guest reviewers will divide into 4 groups and be assigned to different teams of ~7 people. Every 15 minutes the review groups will switch to a different project team, according to the schedule below. The rotation is structured so that you will have 15 minutes on, then 15 minutes off. In total, you will have four 15 minute review sessions.

Prepare your presentation area so reviewers have space to use the prototypes. Also be sure team members are prepared to present to demonstrate/answer questions and others are recording notes during the review.

A 5 minute video of you demonstrating your prototype will be taken during one of your breaks.

 

  7:00-
7:15
7:20-
7:35
7:40-
7:55
8:00-
8:15
8:20-
8:35
8:40-
8:55
9:00-
9:15
9:20-
9:35

red:
(blink controlled smart products)

(1)
*wallace
sutherland
choe
hardt
seering
berezin
albaugh
miller

 

braunstein
saulnier
zabel
tardiff
ramos
kokernak
schoenstein ayers

 

hung
boswell
dave
evans
wiesman
sonin
trice
banuazizi

 

duplessie
artiles
rose
loomis
nielsen
tsai
carleton
banzaert

video

Pappalardo, south conference room

blue:
(voice modulation for hearing impaired)


wallace
sutherland
choe
hardt
seering
berezin
albaugh
miller

 

braunstein
saulnier
zabel
tardiff
ramos
kokernak
schoenstein ayers

 

hung
boswell
dave
evans
wiesman
sonin
trice
banuazizi

video

duplessie
artiles
rose
loomis
nielsen
tsai
carleton
banzaert

classroom, room 3-370

yellow:
search and rescue system

(2)
*duplessie
artiles
rose
loomis
nielsen
tsai
carleton
banzaert

video

wallace
sutherland
choe
hardt
seering
berezin
albaugh
miller

 

braunstein
saulnier
zabel
tardiff
ramos
kokernak
schoenstein ayers

 

hung
boswell
dave
evans
wiesman
sonin
trice
banuazizi

 

Kresge oval, student centre side

purple:
tremor mitigation device


duplessie
artiles
rose
loomis
nielsen
tsai
carleton
banzaert

video

wallace
sutherland
choe
hardt
seering
berezin
albaugh
miller

 

braunstein
saulnier
zabel
tardiff
ramos
kokernak
schoenstein ayers

 

hung
boswell
dave
evans
wiesman
sonin
trice
banuazizi

Pappalardo south conference room

orange:
brick mortar removal device for repointing

(3)
*hung
boswell
dave
evans
wiesman
sonin
trice
banuazizi

 

duplessie
artiles
rose
loomis
nielsen
tsai
carleton
banzaert

video

wallace
sutherland
choe
hardt
seering
berezin
albaugh
miller

 

braunstein
saulnier
zabel
tardiff
ramos
kokernak
schoenstein ayers

 

Pappalardo parking lot, south end

green:
haptic game for the visually impaired


hung
boswell
dave
evans
wiesman
sonin
trice
banuazizi

 

duplessie
artiles
rose
loomis
nielsen
tsai
carleton
banzaert

video

wallace
sutherland
choe
hardt
seering
berezin
albaugh
miller

 

braunstein
saulnier
zabel
tardiff
ramos
kokernak
schoenstein ayers

team area

pink:
music page turner

(4)
*braunstein
saulnier
zabel
tardiff
ramos
kokernak
schoenstein ayers

 

hung
boswell
dave
evans
wiesman
sonin
trice
banuazizi

 

duplessie
artiles
rose
loomis
nielsen
tsai
carleton
banzaert

video

wallace
sutherland
choe
hardt
seering
berezin
albaugh
miller

 

piano, room 4-158

silver:
firefighter device to detect fires behind doors

video

braunstein
saulnier
zabel
tardiff
ramos
kokernak
schoenstein ayers

 

hung
boswell
dave
evans
wiesman
sonin
trice
banuazizi

 

duplessie
artiles
rose
loomis
nielsen
tsai
carleton
banzaert

 

wallace
sutherland
choe
hardt
seering
berezin
albaugh
miller

Pappalardo parking lot, north end

 

After the review
Notes recorded during the review should be disseminated to the team for consideration when prioritizing improvements before the final presentation. If you showed any videos of other materials during the review, please email them to the course instructor (drwallac) by midnight Thursday night. Also, please be sure to email your up-to-date product contract by midnight.

Preliminary feedback will be provided Friday morning on the course website. Additionally, your review materials and video will be posted, and you will receive written feedback from at least 3 course staff either before 5 PM Saturday. After you have received written feedback via email from instructors, complete your milestone reflection in your design notebook.

Please arrange a meeting with Professor Wallace for Tuesday next week to discuss your final presentation setup and have a brief design review, and remember that the 30 minute design reviews are on Monday afternoon.