2.744
Concept Refinement Reviews
Home > Assignments > Concept refinement results > Reviews for Claire Robinson

Claire Robinson
team ark

 FunctionForm
Average Rating
 
Client 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Reviewer 4:
Reviewer 5:
1-marginal     2-ok    3-good     4-very good    5-outstanding

Comments on function-related aspects

Client 1:

This is a really smart test to do at scale. Good thinking. Your results are very interesting, and it will be interesting to see how they compare to full-scale test results.

return to top of page


Reviewer 3:

N/A

return to top of page


Reviewer 5:

The user experience has been defined with adequate detail to help me appreciate the depth to which the tests were conducted. The student has clearly outlined the design requirements (given by the client) and then compared to their test statistics. In addition to this, they have described the reason for the gaps, if any, should exist between the two.

return to top of page



Comments on form-related aspects

Client 1:

return to top of page


Reviewer 3:

N/A

return to top of page


Reviewer 4:

Great job doing user testing. Comments on spacing wider rather than tall are great learnings from this.

Will the hand holds read jelly bean though? Typical rock wall are more amorphous / organic than a typical jelly bean. Just keep that in mind as you go through building out the wall. Perhaps pick a shape that most closely resembles the bean without hurting holding ability.

return to top of page


Reviewer 5:

I could see realize by reading that there was adequate attention to detail with regard to the implementation. The write-up suggested that you used some mock-ups to test the success rate and the user experience. However, it would have been better to include the pictures of these tests here. It could have helped me clearly understand the techniques used and suggest modifications if required.

return to top of page