2.744
Concept Refinement Reviews
Home > Assignments > Concept refinement results > Reviews for Pearl Willmer-Shiles

Pearl Willmer-Shiles
team mango

 FunctionForm
Average Rating
 
Client 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Reviewer 4:
1-marginal     2-ok    3-good     4-very good    5-outstanding

Comments on function-related aspects

Reviewer 2:

Great drawing showing how this works. Reminds me of a pinball machine or a pool table. I would just confirm there aren't any places the ball can get stuck. Either on webbing or corners/top face. Probably more plasticky balls rather than rubbery would avoid sticking, esp in the return tube. Probably ball-pit style balls would be good.

How will you measure which cell the ball goes thru?

return to top of page


Reviewer 3:

The details of the dimensions are important and suggest the design has been quantified and optimized to some degree to work well for the user.

return to top of page


Reviewer 4:

The layout is concise. Ii like the layout.

return to top of page



Comments on form-related aspects

Client 1:

I have some concerns about this drawing. It doesn't match up with your teammates' concepts in a couple of key ways:

- Other pages talk about only allowing one ball at a time through to the players, but you're showing two

- The return tube is very high on the hit detection board in comparison to what is shown on the hit detection concept page

- The ball regulation mechanism is missing

I guess my takeaway from this is that I'm confused about its purpose. For a layout diagram, it is missing some key components. For a form diagram, I think you could have done some work in a 3D rendering program instead of using a pencil sketch.

return to top of page


Reviewer 3:

The rendering looks to be hand-drawn which although more time consuming has been executed to great effect with excellent perspective and good form and structure.

return to top of page


Reviewer 4:

I like the combination of sound and display effects

return to top of page