2.744
Human-use Analysis Reviews
Home > Assignments > Human-use analysis results > Reviews for Michael Arnold

Michael Arnold
moss piglets
[review]

 Analysis RatingsPresentation Ratings
Average Rating
 
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
1-marginal     2-ok    3-good     4-very good    5-outstanding

Quality and thoroughness of human-use analysis and improvement suggestions

Reviewer 1:

These are very nice, but I think they are storyboards not the user-experience anaylses

return to top of page


Reviewer 2:

While the personal anecdotes are meant to strengthen the case, I feel having a page solely dedicated to them doesn't add too much to the overall analysis. This could have also been condensed into a subsection perhaps within the introduction itself. There is background information given about other machine meant to act as comparisons to the chosen Jura Impressa C60 but don't feel entirely necessary in the analysis since they aren't as emphasized as the mentioned machine.

return to top of page


Reviewer 3:

This analysis was comical in its use of testimonials (and fun to read) and felt fairly thorough regarding the actual use of the machine. The pictures breaking down each step in the coffee machine's use were extremely helpful for non-coffee drinkers like myself to visualize. The critique and accompanying pictures were also nice. The recommendations felt a little bit rushed, mostly because it seemed like there was so much more to be improved. Perhaps showing a potential drawing of a redesign would have been helpful. I also felt like some of the content prior to the Jura machine analysis was extraneous, as the coffee machine choice is irrelevant to your reader and the Jura machine is the focus of your analysis.

return to top of page



Clarity and presentation of human-use experience analysis

Reviewer 1:

These are very nice, but I think they are storyboards not the user-experience anaylses

return to top of page


Reviewer 2:

You may want to find a different way to present your table of contents. While I understand wanting to work with the flow, having to go all the way to the bottom of the page disrupts browsing through the site. Also the way that it is currently set up seems a bit cluttered. It makes it harder to switch between sections. I would suggest having a sidebar which has the different sections with shorter yet still descriptive titles.

return to top of page


Reviewer 3:

The website was very clean and aesthetically pleasing. The setup really helped emphasize the content on the page (the borders around the photos were a particularly neat touch). It feels odd to have all of the shortcuts at the bottom of the page, but that's minor. Overall the site was very nice.

return to top of page