Overall rating from peers, based upon 3
reviews: 
| 1-marginal
2-ok
3-good
4-very good
5-outstanding |
Reviewer 1: There are a number of concepts and ideas in ...
Reviewer 2: I enjoyed the attack of the sea monster in ...
Reviewer 3: The constructed physical models are depicted ...
Reviewer 1:  |
There are a number of concepts and ideas in these storyboard (pages 3 and 4). Many of these can be complete projects in themselves if they are to be done well. I think the team should focus at this point on one concept. Of the concepts modeled, my vote would be (in order of preference) for: 1. door gear puzzle 2. dented room 3. charging capacitor + firing
return to top of page |
| Reviewer 2: |
I enjoyed the attack of the sea monster in your storyboard, particularly the wall, door, and the "shocker." However, I thought that the first part of the storyboard relating to the specimen collection was a little confusing, and I am not too sure what to think of it. Also, Page 4 of your storyboard is cut off at the bottom. On page 5, are the people going to be both in the pod and on the sub? Do they have to rely on memory for the electricity? Maybe relying on memory is the fast fix, and doing something else is the slower electricity puzzle. If they complete the fast fix, then they will experience an additional challenge. Also, what are the specimens on page 5 that they are rearranging?
return to top of page |
| Reviewer 3: |
The constructed physical models are depicted in the storyline; in scene one of The Scientist Challenge: Saving the Specimens plot, the team has used a direct metaphor of a hat to introduce a challenge, which contributes to the user s experience. There is a typo error in scene 2 of plot 3 adn. By comparing scene 1 and 2 in plot 9, the team cleverly illustrates the darkness in the room due to power failure. The storyline is clear and there is a smooth transition from one scene to the other. The storyboard has been refined from last time I reviewed it!
return to top of page |
