1999 2.972 Class Evaluation
Please fill print out, fill out,
then return to or leave for:
Maureen Lynch
Room 35-014
A. If you can not print it, there will be
copies posted outside of 35-008
B. I plan to write an article about the class, if you would be interested in
providing more information, please e-mail your interest to mculpepp@mit.edu
PERSONAL INFORMATION:
Year:
Session (1 or 2):
THE CLASS IN GENERAL:
| Please rate how this class has
helped your understanding/skill level with respect to the following. 1 = very little help; 5 = a lot of help |
|
| Recognize the limiting and dominant physics behind many machines | |
| My ability to figure out how unfamiliar machines work | |
| Develop physical understanding for magnitudes (i.e torque, power, size, ...) | |
| The ability to visualize things in 3D | |
| Skill in using spreadsheets | |
| Skill in the use of Solid Modeling | |
| Learning Solid Modeling helped me to think/visualize in 3D | |
| Understanding of Functional Requirements and Design Parameters | |
| Your ability to explain things to others with simple sketches | |
| With respect to my expectations this class: | 1 = Was below expectations 5 = Exceeded my expectations |
| The class was fun | 1 = No fun 5 = A lot of fun |
INSTRUCTOR
| Please fill out the following with
respect to your instructors ability. 1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree |
|
| Amount of feedback on papers and lab reports was appropriate | |
| Amount of guidance on final paper was appropriate | |
| Instructor was approachable | |
| Instructor was knowledgeable | |
| Instructor was able to explain things so I could understand them | |
| Instructors overall teaching ability | |
| Compare instructor's overall ability to those
of other MIT professors you have had. Consider your idea of an average MIT
professor as a mark of 3. |
1 = Much Worse 5 = Much Better |
FINAL REPORT
| Please indicate your feelings about the following statements as applied to the final reports. | |
| Difficulty level was appropriate | 1 = Too easy 5 = Too hard |
| Do you feel that you learned something by doing the report? | 1 = Learned little 5 = Learned a lot |
| The reports were meant to
require 1 to 2 days worth of time, but most students spent 3-4 days or more. How
much did the following affect the amount of time and effort you put into your final
report? 1 = very little effect; 5 = a lot of effect |
|
| You would be published on web | |
| Impact on grade | |
| Just the way I do things | |
| Depth of your interest in report topic was high | |
| Time to make graphics/sketches | |
| Inability to find resources/books on topic | |
| Inability of resources/books to explain topic | |
| Other (please specify)
|
|
LABS
| Please rate
the the following with respect to the labs/take apart sessions. 1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree |
|
| Time spent in lab was fun.. | |
| I was satisfied with the variety and amount of machines to take apart. | |
| I liked the lab format (2 days then switch) | |
| I liked the atmosphere in lab | |
| Explaining things to others (on lab switch day) helped me learn to explain things? | |
| Explaining things to others (on lab switch day) help me realize my level of comprehension of the class material? | |
| Difficulty level of the lab write-ups was | 1 = Too easy 5 = Too hard |
EXTERNAL GEAR PUMP PROJECT:
| Please rate the following with respect to the
external gear pump project. 1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree |
|
| Project helped you link the affects of tolerance/small sizes on performance | |
| Demonstrated the capability and usefulness of Solid Modeling | |
| Helped you learn Solid Modeling | |
| Difficulty level of the project was appropriate | 1 = Too easy 5 = Too difficult |
LECTURE/WORK SHOPS
| Please rate the the
following with respect to the lectures given 35-125A. 1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree |
|
| Material presented was easy to understand | |
| Material was relevant to becoming a good engineer | |
| Material prepared you for labs, project, and final report | |
| Amount of technical/theoretical content was appropriate | 1 = To little 5 = To much |
| Level of technical/theoretical content was appropriate | 1 = Too low 5 = Too advanced |
| Lectures were appropriate long (in time) | 1 = Too short 5 = Too long |
FIELD TRIPS
| Please rate the field trips. Mark N/A if you did not participate. | ||
| Interesting Content | Increased your understanding of presented materials/machines |
|
| 1 = very little; 5 = a lot | 1 = very little; 5 = a lot | |
| Aero-E Department Tour & Wind Tunnel | ||
| Physical Plant | ||
| MIT MEMS Tour | ||
| Car Wash | ||
CAREER OR EDUCATION GOALS:
| Please indicate how seriously you have
considered the following options for your future. 1 = not considering; 5 = strongly considering |
||
| Before 2.972 | After 2.972 | |
| Graduate School | ||
| Industry/Engineering Job | ||
| Consulting | ||
| Field Other than Engineering | ||
| Has taking this class
helped point you toward one of the areas above? If so, please explain what/how.
|
||
MIT CURRICULUM IN GENERAL
| Your responses will help us understand how a class like 2.972 could help the course 2 curriculum. Please comment on the following MIT classes: | |||
| Mark N/A if you have not taken the class! | |||
| How much did you learn? | Your confidence in your ability to use/apply what you learned | Would this class benefit by devoting some time to a "take apart" week(s)? | |
| 1 = very little; 5 = a lot | 1 = very little; 5 = a lot | 1 = very little; 5 = a lot | |
| 2.972 Understanding How Things Work |
N/A | ||
| 8.01 Physics I |
|||
| 2.001 & 2.002 Mechanics and Materials I & II |
|||
| 2.005 & 2.006 Thermal-Fluids Engineering I & II |
|||
| 2.007 Design and Manufacturing I |
|||
| 2.009 The Product Engineering Process |
|||
| 2.72 Elements of Mechanical Design |
|||
OTHER COMMENTS (CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM IS WELCOME):