Constrained control problems are ubiquitous. Since we cannot escape them, the only
alternative is to develop "sound" methodologies for dealing with them. That is,
we must provide methods that have specific guarantees as dictated by the problem,
otherwise we cannot say with certainty that our control decision will result in a
stable or safe system.
In particular, two different, but related, constrained control areas are
investigated. The first is the problem of Linear Time Invariant systems subject to
nonlinear actuators. That is, actuators that have symmetric or asymmetric position
constraints and possibly rate constraints. The second problem is the detection and
resolution of aircraft conflicts. Both problems are very pressing in their own
distinct ways.
For the first problem a nonlinear state feedback methodology is
developed that has guaranteed constraint satisfaction and global asymptotic stability.
This is brought about by scheduling the gain to avoid saturation at all times, and
is accomplished through a set of nested invariant ellipsoids that for each gain approximate
the maximal invariant set. A comparison to sub-controllable sets and an application
to the F/A-18 are given.
The second problem is approached through a two phase method. Firstly,
aircraft conflicts are detected by performing a worst case analysis of the situation
through Linear Matrix Inequality feasibility problems. Once
this is completed the resolution problem is approached by formulation as a convex
optimization problem. The resulting strategy is highly combinatorial in its complexity. A
possible solution to this problem is attempted by formulation of a lower bound obtained
by convex optimization techniques. The figure below is taken from an example of a
spring mass system.