| Joint Publication (Pub) 1 refers to [these
principles] as “those aspects of warfare that
are universally true and relevant.” The
principles of war:
…apply equally to all of the US armed forces.
…are guidelines that
commanders can use to form and select a course of action.
…are no substitute
for sound, professional judgment—but to ignore
them totally is equally risky.
…should not be considered
individually without due consideration of the others.
… when combined with
the additional fundamentals of air and space power,
provide the basis for a sound and enduring doctrine
for the air and space forces of America’s joint
force.
Unity of Command
… ensures the
concentration of effort for every objective under one
responsible commander. This principle emphasizes that
all efforts should be directed and coordinated toward
a common objective.
Air and space power’s
theater wide perspective calls for unity of command
to gain the most efficient application. Coordination
may be achieved by cooperation; it is, however, best
achieved by vesting a single commander with the authority
to direct all force employment in pursuit of a common
objective.
Objective
… is concerned
with directing military operations toward a defined
and attainable objective that contributes to strategic,
operational, or tactical aims. In application, this
principle refers to unity of effort. … [P]olitical
and military goals should be complementary and clearly
articulated.
Unlike surface forces,
modern … air and space forces can pursue tactical,
operational, or strategic objectives, in any combination,
or all three simultaneously. From an airman’s
perspective, then, the principle of the objective shapes
priorities to allow air and space forces to concentrate
on theater or campaign priorities. …
Offensive
… is to act rather
than react and dictates the time, place, purpose, scope,
intensity, and pace of operations. The initiative must
be seized as soon as possible.
The principle of the
offensive holds that offensive action, or initiative,
provides the means for joint forces to dictate battle-space
operations. Air and space forces are best used
as an offensive weapon. … Airpower’s
ability to mass and maneuver and its ability to operate
at the tactical, operational, or strategic levels of
warfare—or to simultaneously operate at all levels—provide
JFCs a resource with global presence to directly and
almost immediately seize the initiative.
Mass
… calls for concentrating
combat power at a decisive time and place. At the operational
level, this principle suggests that superior, concentrated
combat power is used to achieve decisive results.
Mass is an effect that
air and space forces achieve through efficiency of attack.
Today’s air and space forces have altered the
concept of massed forces. Today, a single precision
weapon that is targeted using superior battlespace awareness
can often cause the destructive effect that in the past
took hundreds of bombs.
Maneuver
… calls for action
to place the enemy in a position of disadvantage through
the flexible application of combat power. Like
the offensive, maneuver forces the enemy to react, allows
the exploitation of successful friendly operations,
and reduces our vulnerabilities.
The ability to integrate
a force quickly and to strike directly at an adversary’s
strategic or operational center of gravity (COG) is
a key theme of air and space power’s maneuver
advantage. … [T]he versatility and responsiveness
of airpower allow the simultaneous application of mass
and maneuver. Air and space maneuver is uniquely
able to achieve mass while moving with unmatched agility.
Economy of Force
… calls for the
rational use of force by selecting the best mix of combat
power. At the operational level, this requires
minimum effort be made towards secondary objectives
that do not support the larger operational or strategic
objectives.
While this principle
was well developed before the advent of air-power, it
responds precisely to the greatest vulnerability of
air and space power employment: the misuse or misdirection
of air and space power, which can reduce its contribution
even more than enemy action. Ill-defined objectives
can result in the piecemeal application of air and space
forces with the resultant loss of decisive effects.
Security
… requires that
friendly forces and their operations be protected from
enemy action that could provide the enemy with unexpected
advantage.
[Base security] must
be a particular focus of operations during peace support
or crisis situations when forces operate from austere
and unimproved locations, in small units, or in crowded
urban settings and face threats to security from individuals
and groups as well as possible military or paramilitary
units.
Critical to security
is the understanding that air and space power is no
longer just aircraft, missiles, and satellites but information
warfare tools as well. Thus security embraces not only
physical security, but also security of the information
medium.
Surprise
… leverages the
security principle by attacking at a time, place, or
in a manner for which the enemy is not prepared.
The speed and range
of air and space forces, coupled with their flexibility
and versatility, allow air forces to achieve surprise
more readily than surface forces. When combined
with stealth and information technologies, air and space
forces today can provide shock and surprise without
unnecessarily exposing massed friendly forces. Surprise
is one of air and space power’s strongest advantages.
Simplicity
… calls for avoiding
unnecessary complexity in organizing, preparing, planning,
and conducting military operations. [G]uidance,
plans, and orders are as simple and direct as the objective
will allow.
Simple guidance allows
subordinate commanders the freedom to creatively operate
within their battlespace. … [S]traightforward
plans and unambiguous organizational and command relationships
are central to reducing [complexity]. The premise that
airmen work for airmen and that the senior airman (the
commander of Air Force forces) works for the JFC is
central to simplicity. |