PHIL 285 - Special Topics: A Vagueness Primer
Spring 2005
Agustín
Rayo
Starred texts are especially encouraged.
* Russell, B. `Vagueness' (in Keefe and Smith)
Williamson, T. `The ideal of precision' (Chapter 2 of
Vagueness)
* Machina, K. `Truth, belief and vagueness' (in Keefe and Smith)
* Sainsbury, R. M. `Concepts without boundaries' (in Keefe
and Smith)
Williamson, T. `Many-valued logic and degrees of
truth' (chapter 4 of Vagueness)
* Fine, K. `Vagueness, truth and logic' (in Keefe and
Smith) - no need to feel guilty if you end up skipping section 5
Williamson, T. `Supervaluations' (chapter 5 of Vagueness)
* McGee, V. and McLaughlin, B. `Distinctions without a
difference', Southern Journal of Philosophy (Supplement) 33, 1995,
pp. 203-51.
Williamson, T. `Supervaluations' (chapter 5 of Vagueness)
* Lewis, D. `Many, but Almost One' in
Bacon, J. et al.
(eds.) Ontology, Causality and Mind: Essays in Honour of D M
Armstrong, Cambridge University Press, 1993; reprinted in Lewis, D. Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
McGee, Vann and Brian McLaughlin (2000) ěThe Lessons of the Manyî Philosophical Topics 28: 129-51.
* Evans, G. `Can there be vague objects?' (in Keefe and
Smith)
* Lewis, D. `Vague identity: Evans misunderstood?' (in Keefe
and Smith)
Hawley, K. `Vagueness and Existence', Proceedings of the
Aristotelian Society, CII.2 (2002), pp 125-140.
* Williamson, T. `Vagueness as Ignorance' (chapter 7 of
Vagueness)
* Williamson, T. `Inexact Knowledge' (chapter 8 of
Vagueness)
* Graff, D. `Shifting Sands: An Interest-Relative Theory of
Vagueness', Philosophical Topics 28, 2000, pp. 45-81.
Raffman, D. `Vagueness Without Paradox', Philosophical Review 103,
1994, pp. 41-74.
* Wright, C. `Language Mastery and the Sorites Paradox' (in
Keefe and Smith)
Williamson, T. `Nihilism' (chapter 6 of Vagueness)
|
If you're taking the course for credit, I'll ask you to turn in a paper by the end of the term. Please don't hesitate to come see me if you'd like to think about your paper out loud, or if you'd like to run an argument by me. I'd also be happy to look at early drafts of your papers.