|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
||
| Home |
||
|
||
We study small RNAs that regulate gene expression. Our main focus is on microRNAs (miRNAs), which are ~22-nt RNAs that specify gene repression by base-pairing to messages of protein-coding genes. Our lab is uncovering both the widespread influence of miRNAs on metazoan gene expression and the roles that miRNAs play during growth and development of plants and animals. For example, our work indicates that more than half of human protein-coding genes are conserved regulatory targets of miRNAs and that the miRNA regulation of one of these genes is important for preventing human cancers.
Genomics of MicroRNAs. Our lab was among those that discovered the abundance of miRNAs. These tiny endogenous RNAs are encoded by unusual genes whose primary transcripts form distinctive hairpin structures from which the miRNAs are processed. Each hairpin is processed to generate the mature ~22-nt miRNA, which is then incorporated into a silencing complex, where it can specify post-transcriptional gene repression by base-pairing to messages of protein-coding genes.
We previously developed cloning and computational
strategies for miRNA gene discovery in animals and plants and found, for example,
that humans have hundreds of miRNA genes. We have also shown that many miRNAs
are present at levels of more than 1,000 molecules per cell, with some exceeding
50,000 molecules per cell, indicating that the miRNAs, together with their
associated proteins, are among the more abundant ribonucleoprotein complexes
found in animal cells. Furthermore, many of the miRNAs from nematodes, insects,
and mammals are related to each other, suggesting important functions since
the common ancestor of these diverse animal lineages.
To explore more thoroughly the genomics and evolution of miRNAs and other
endogenous silencing RNAs, we are using high-throughput sequencing to obtain
millions of sequencing reads representing small RNAs from diverse plants and
animals. For example, we find both miRNAs and another class of small regulatory
RNAs known as piRNAs (described below) in the most deeply branching animals,
implying that these two classes of regulatory miRNAs have been available to
shape gene expression since the beginning of multicellular animal life. Recent
analyses of more nematode, fly, and mammalian sequences have revealed additional
miRNAs, including some that had been missed earlier because their initial
processing involves splicing rather than the specialized machinery that generates
canonical miRNAs.
Other Small Regulatory RNAs. In addition to new miRNAs, our sequencing of small RNAs has also revealed previously unknown types of RNAs, including heterochromatic siRNAs (small interfering RNAs) and other types of endogenous siRNAs. Particularly intriguing have been the 21U-RNAs found in nematodes. Precisely 21 nucleotides long, they begin with a uridine but are diverse in their remaining 20 nucleotides. 21U-RNAs originate from >15,000 genomic loci dispersed in two broad regions of one chromosome—primarily between protein-coding genes or within their introns. These loci share a large upstream motif that is conserved in other nematodes, presumably because of its importance for producing this class of small RNAs. In a collaboration with Craig Mello’s lab, we recently found that 21U-RNAs are expressed specifically in the germline and are associated with a Piwi-related protein, which is needed for normal germ-line development and fertility. In flies and mammals, Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) are also found in the germline, where they direct transposon silencing and can have other roles in gamete production. Although the 21U-RNAs differ from the piRNAs found in other animals with respect to their size and biogenesis, the 21U-RNAs appear to function as the piRNAs of nematodes.
Regulatory Targets of MicroRNAs. The discovery of hundreds
of miRNA genes raised the question of what all these tiny RNAs are doing.
To address this question, we have developed methods of predicting miRNA targets
without bringing in too many false-positive predictions. In plants, the miRNAs
have extensive pairing to their targets, and the evolutionarily conserved
targets are mostly genes that play important roles during development. In
animals, the miRNAs usually recognize shorter sites (typically 7 or 8 nucleotides
in length) that match a short region of the miRNA containing the "seed" sequence. Animal miRNAs
have a great abundance and diversity of targets. In collaboration with Christopher
Burge, we recently showed that most human protein-coding genes have
been under selective pressure to maintain pairing to miRNAs. When nonconserved
targeting is considered, the fraction of human genes regulated by miRNAs
grows even higher.
Although a 7mer site matching a miRNA often mediates some repression, it is
not always sufficient, indicating that other characteristics help specify
targeting. Using both computational and experimental approaches, we uncovered
five general features of site context that boost site efficacy. Combining
these features, we constructed a model of target recognition that successfully
predicts site performance, thereby providing an important resource for choosing
which of the many miRNA-target relationships are most promising for experimental
follow-up. Because our approach distinguishes effective from ineffective sites
without recourse to evolutionary conservation, it also identifies effective
nonconserved sites and siRNA off-targets. Our target predictions for mammals,
flies and nematodes can be viewed at TargetScan.org,
with ranking of mammalian predictions available according to their predicted
efficacy or their preferential conservation.
To complement our ongoing studies of the influence of metazoan miRNAs on mRNA
abundance and evolution, we have been collaborating with Steven
Gygi’s
lab to use quantitative mass spectrometry to examine the impact of introducing
or deleting individual miRNAs on the output of thousands of proteins. The
identities of the responsive proteins and the extent of their response correspond
well with our previous predictions. For most targets, mRNA destabilization
explains more of the repression than does translational repression. Hundreds
of genes are directly repressed by individual microRNAs, albeit each to
a modest degree, indicating that for most interactions, microRNAs act as
rheostats to make fine-scale adjustments to protein output.
Biological Functions of MicroRNAs. By disrupting the regulation of particular targets, several groups, including ours, have demonstrated the importance of miRNA-directed regulation during each stage of plant development. Our efforts, often in collaboration with Bonnie Bartel's lab, have focused on the repression of the messages of NAC-domain transcription factors, auxin-response transcription factors, HD-Zip transcription factors, and ARGONAUTE1, a protein crucial for plant miRNA function. With regard to miRNA function in mammals, we showed that miR-196 directs the cleavage of HoxB8 mRNA during mouse embryonic development and also appears to repress paralogous Hox genes. More recently, we worked with Michael Hemann to show that disrupting the miRNA regulation of the Hmga2 oncogene enhances oncogenic transformation. Because many human tumors possess defective Hmga2 genes that lack the miRNA complementary sites, our work indicates that losing miRNA regulation of this oncogene contributes to human cancers.
Bartel, D.P. MicroRNAs: Target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 136: 215-233 (2009).
Friedman, R.C., Farh, K.K., Burge, C.B., and Bartel, D.P. Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. Genome Res. 19: 92-105 (2009).
Grimson, A., Srivastava, M., Fahey, B., Woodcroft, B.J., Chiang, H.R., King, N., Degnan, B.M., Rokhsar, D.S., and Bartel, D.P. Early origins and evolution of microRNAs and piRNAs in animals. Nature 455: 1193-1197 (2008).
Baek, D., Villen, J., Shin, C., Camargo, F.D., Gygi, S.P., and Bartel, D.P. The impact of microRNAs on protein output. Nature 455: 64-71 (2008).
Mayr, C., Hemann, M.T., and Bartel, D.P. Disrupting the pairing between let-7 and Hmga2 enhances oncogenic transformation. Science 16: 1576-1579 (2007).
Ruby, J.G., Jan, C.H., and Bartel, D.P. Intronic microRNA precursors that bypass Drosha processing. Nature 448: 83-86 (2007).
Grimson, A., Farh, K.K., Johnston, W.K., Garrett-Engele, P., Lim, L.P., and Bartel, D.P. MicroRNA targeting specificity in mammals: determinants beyond seed pairing. Mol. Cell 27: 91-105 (2007).
Ruby, J.G., Jan, C., Player, C., Axtell, M.J., Lee, W., Nusbaum, C., Ge, H., and Bartel, D.P. Large-scale sequencing reveals 21U-RNAs and additional microRNAs and endogenous siRNAs in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell 127: 1193-1207 (2006).
Axtell, M.J., Jan, C., Rajagopalan, R., and Bartel, D.P. A conserved trigger for siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell 127: 565-577 (2006).
Rajagopalan, R., Vaucheret, H., Trejo, J., and Bartel, D.P. A diverse and evolutionarily fluid set of microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes Dev., 20: 3407-3425 (2006).
Search PubMed for Bartel Lab publications.
photo credit: Justin Allardyce Knight