|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
||
| Home |
||
|
||
Overview
The proteins of a cell are the primary determinants of cellular form and function.
Regulation of the proteome is therefore the ultimate goal of signaling pathways
that connect cell physiology to internal and external environmental cues.
We study the molecular mechanisms and physiological functions of translational
control of gene expression using genome-wide translation state profiling,
molecular genetics, and biochemistry.
Research Summary
What are the mechanisms and functions of cap-independent translation?
The primary pathway for eukaryotic translation initiation requires the concerted
action of numerous protein factors that are specifically recruited to mRNAs possessing
a 5’ m7G cap. In response to a variety of environmental perturbations,
cells down-regulate cap-dependent translation while favoring expression of a
select group of genes via alternative initiation mechanisms including direct
recruitment of the translation machinery to internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs).
We discovered a novel sequence-specific molecular mechanism that coordinately
controls IRES-dependent translation of several yeast genes required for differentiation
during starvation by using genetic and biochemical manipulations of both mRNA
substrates and the translation machinery. We have now identified many new cellular
IRESs (> 3 dozen and counting), and are currently working to determine their
physiological roles and molecular architectures.
How does UTR diversity contribute to regulation of gene expression?
5’ untranslated regions (UTRs) influence translational efficiency of
mRNAs through diverse mechanisms: long and/or structured 5’UTRs are
more difficult to scan, yet may afford resistance to 5’ to 3’ exonucleases;
specific sequence or structure elements provide internal recruitment sites
for translation factors or regulatory proteins; and upstream open reading
frames (uORFs) modulate translation initiation site choice and efficiency.
Alternative 5’UTR production is ubiquitous in eukaryotes and has enormous
regulatory potential, perhaps comparable to that afforded by alternative splicing
(which may also serve to increase 5’UTR diversity). We are combining
high-throughput 5’end sequencing with translation-state profiling to
obtain comprehensive knowledge of 5’UTR utilization under various growth
states. We will use this rich dataset to propose and then test the ‘rules’ that
govern translational efficiency in vivo.
Are ribosomes specialized?
Ribosomes are magnificent and versatile molecular machines. Although gorgeous
high-resolution structures tempt us to regard ribosomes as unchanging homogeneous
entities, many opportunities for molecular specialization exist, including
alternative ribosomal protein isoforms, ribosome accessory proteins, post-translational
modification of ribosomal proteins, and post-transcriptional modification
of ribosomal RNAs. We are taking a proteomics approach, in collaboration
with Steve Carr’s group at the Broad Institute, to investigate the
changes in ribosome composition that are associated with cellular adaptive
responses. We are exploring the functional consequences of ribosome specialization
through translation-state profiling and biochemical characterization of
mutant (forcibly unspecialized) ribosomes.
Selected Publications
Gilbert, W. V., Zhou, K., Butler, T. K. and Doudna,
J. A. Cap-independent translation is required for starvation-induced differentiation
in yeast. Science,
2007, 317(5842):1224-7.
Gilbert, W. V. and Guthrie, C. The Glc7p nuclear phosphatase promotes mRNA export by facilitating association of Mex67p with mRNA. Mol Cell, 2004, 13(2):201-212.
Gilbert, W. V., Siebel, C. W., and Guthrie, C. Phosphorylation by Sky1p promotes Npl3p shuttling and mRNA dissociation. RNA, 2001, 7:302-313.Search PubMed for Gilbert lab publications.
Also see Google Scholar search for more publications.