Sigma AF-Zoom 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO Macro
This is Sigma's consumer grade telephoto zoom which was introduced early 1995. I
think is only a slight modification, mainly for the D-compatibility, of an earlier version:
75-300/4-5.6 APO. Note that there is different (cheaper) version without the APO
designation. APO stands for apochromatic correction to reduce the color infringement
at image corners. I keep this lens as a compact and light-weight 300mm lens, while
praying for Nikon's 300/4 or 400/5.6 to become affordable.
The specifications include:
- Two-touch design, with rotating front element
- Focal length: 70 to 300mm, with 70, 135 200 and 300mm marked on the barrel.
- Aperture values: f/4 to f/22 in the short end (marked); clicks stops for every half
stop; f/5.6 to f/32 in the long end.
- Minimum focusing distance: 1.5m, 0.95m in macro range.
- Filter thread: 58mm
- Lens hood: bayonet type, included
- Length: 4.7in when fully retrieved; 8in when fully extended;
Mechanical construction is quite awful, with every movable part
wobbles quite a bit. Its plastic feels cheap, although the rubberized finish (called "Zen
finish") feel good and yet sometimes sticky. The macro switch is fiddly, and often
needs several trials to set or unset it. When fully zoomed out, the lens doubles its
length. But the extending part is light-weighted part, so the balance is kept quite well,
just looks plain ugly: for a telephoto lens the front end is smaller than the rear end!
The zoom ring is well frictioned but sometimes too rigid. Manual focusing feel OK
albeit loose. AF is noisy and quite slow (due to its long throw). So far I don't have any
electronic compatibility problem with either N90s or N6006 camera.
I found that the optical quality of this lens is very decent in most of its
optical aspects. APO has indeed has achieved what it claims. And, one neat feature is
its macros capability at the 300mm end, which can achieve a 1:2 magnification, and
continuously AF-able. But I haven't yet utilized this feature since most of time I prefer
to bring the Nikkor with me.
I did a test comparing this lens with Nikkor AF-Zoom
ED 80-200. My observations are: Color is slightly cooler (slightly toward
greenish) than the Nikkor. Contrast is also slightly lower, but not very noticeable.
Color saturation is excellent. Center sharpness is well comparable, except at the short
end, to the Nikkor and is very even through out apertures. Corners are soft, and
improves only when well stopped down, such as f/16 marked. Almost unnoticeable
light fall-off at wide open. Almost unnoticeable pincushion type distortion.
This lens does not perform well with TCs as the corners becomes
unacceptable. Also, the lens wobbles quite a bit when fully zoomed, which is OK when
used by itself, but becomes a serious alignment problem when used with TC. I've
observed that one of the corners, not the center, has the sharpest image.
My conclusion: a decent cheap lens with fine optics. Also quite a neat 300
f/5.6 poor man' long macro lens. Well worth the money, but needs a good care.
Back to my Photo Gear page
Last updated: July 18, 1997.