A supernova represents the sudden brightening, within a matter of hours, of a star by as much as 21 magnitudes. We know that for a few days or weeks a supernova is likely to outshine all the other stars in its parent galaxy combined. And we know that for every bit of knowledge we gain by observation and modeling, we encounter another set of perplexing questions which require more observations and better models to answer.
The two major types of supernovae are, quite simply, Type I and Type
II. The difference between the two is simply the presence or absence
of the Balmer Hydrogen lines in the spectrum of the supernova. If,
<
Within Type I, supernovae lacking any hydrogen lines in their maximum
light spectra, there is a further subdivision into Type Ia, Ib, and
Ic. Those designated Type Ia show a strong feature at 6150 Angstroms
which is caused by singly-ionized Silicon (Si II). Type I SNe lacking
this Si II feature are classified as Type Ib if they show substantial
evidence of neutral Helium, especially the neutral Helium (He I) line
at 5876 Angstroms. If the neutral Helium features are weak or
missing entirely then the supernova is classified as Type Ic.
Supernovae of Type II are subdivided not by variations in spectra but
by the way their luminosity changes over time, a property often called
the light curve. In many cases SN II will reach maximum brightness,
dim slightly, and then stay at almost the same brightness for many
days. These SN II are known as Type IIP SNe, with the P meaning
plateau. They eventually begin to dim again, with the decrease being
monotonic and linear. Other SN II quickly reach maximum brightness
and then dim regularly in a linear fashion. These are classified as
Type IIL supernovae. Some SN II exhibit stranger behavior, dimming
and brightening again, as in the case of the recent SN1993J.
Current models of supernovae suggest that all types of SNe <
In the nuclear furnace of the stellar core where iron fusion is being
driven by the star's inexorable gravity, the iron fusion draws heat
out of the surrounding super-dense hot plasma. With the rapid
decrease in free energy the core collapses while at the same time a
vast number of high energy photons, or gamma rays, are released by the
iron fusion. These gammas have sufficiently high energy that they
are able to destroy most of the more complex atoms. When the gamma
penetrates the nucleus it's energy is absorbed by the nucleus, and
this energy is greater than the nuclear binding energy. This process
is known as photodissociation.
In short order the collapsing core is convered from nickel and iron
nuclei to mostly alpha particles, or helium nuclei. Still, the
process doesn't stop here. As the core collapsed the mass of the star
remained above it, held in place briefly by inertia. But deprived of
support from the core, the overlying mass of the star falls freely. As
this mass impacts onto the now largely Helium core it is further
compressed and heated. The Helium is then dissociated into the
fundamental subatomic particles - protons, neutrons, and electrons;
and for a brief time the electrostatic force of the electrons resists
the pressure of the star's overlying weight. But this resistance,
known as electron degeneracy pressure, is not enough to resist the
force of gravity given the tremendous mass of the star. As electron
degeneracy pressure is overcome by gravity, a strange reaction known
as <
Now, the neutron core, compressed still by the force of the infalling
stellar matter, rebounds from its maximum compression. The shock wave
of the rebound travels outward through the star - tearing it apart and
triggering a number of complex nuclear reactions in the process which
produce elements spanning the periodic table.
The current understanding of this process is far from complete.
Nobody has any more than the vaguest idea of how to formulate the
equations of state given the incredible temperatures and pressures
involved. Even careful study of the most powerful nuclear bombs
tested on Earth do not approach the conditions involved in these
supernovae. The most fruitful studies involve powerful computer
models attempting to replicate the observed properties of real SNe.
While some of these models have finally achieved behaviors
representative of real SNe in the last several years, the theoreticians admit they lack accuracy.
The explanation for how this basic model can produce the various
spectral types observed, such as SN Ib, Ic, IIP and IIL, is that by
the time a large star reaches the iron fusion stage its outer layers
are mostly out of touch with the core. In the cases where no Hydrogen
is observed (SNe Ib and Ic) the accepted explanation is that a strong
stellar wind or a nearby binary companion has swept away the star's
outer layer of Hydrogen prior to the core collapse. In the case of SN
Ic the Helium layer beneath the Hydrogen layer has been largely
depleted as well. Conversely, SN II have retained a large portion of
their Hydrogen envelopes, and we see this Hydrogen in the spectrum of
the supernova.
The Type IIL supernovae show a linear decline in their light curves,
similar to the light curves of SNe I. SNe IIP, the plateau
supernovae, are thought to have this property because the exploding
star is expanding just fast enough for the increase in radius to
compensate for decreasing surface temperature. (Stars emit light
proportional to the square of their radii and the fourth power of
temperature.) The few SN that have been observed to dim and then
re-brighten before entering the plateau phase are postulated to have
experienced an accelerated expansion after the initial brightening
began to decrease.
This leaves supernovae of Type Ia. These are special in several ways,
perhaps most importantly because they are the brightest in absolute
terms. There is strong evidence to suggest that all Type Ia SNe have
the same absolute maximum brightness, and if this is true they provide
an excellent "standard candle" for measuring the distances to distant
galaxies.
But Type Ia supernovae can not be caused by the deaths of massive
stars. First, no compact neutron stars are found in the remnants of
type Ia SNe. Second, no physical process, no matter how violent, can
produce the luminosity observed from SNe Ia by core collapse of even
a supergiant star 100 times the mass of the Sun. The outer layers of
a giant star would absorb too much of the energy. Rather, it is
necessary that a mass of something more than the Sun's mass be
completely destroyed while unshielded by overlaying material for
anything as bright as a Type Ia SN to be possible.
So what is left, what can they be?
White Dwarf stars, those dense hot corpses of stars slowly cooling to
cinders, have the curious property that the more massive White Dwarves
are smaller in radius. While this is completely against all common
sense it is nonetheless true. The WD stars are only supported against
gravity by electron degeneracy pressure, and as more mass produces
more gravity, the electrons are squeezed together more tightly - thus
decreasing radius with increasing mass.
But obviously there must be some limit to this. At what point will
the mass of a White Dwarf become so much that it is compressed into a
point mass of zero radius? And what happens then?
S. Chandrasekhar (University of Chicago) has shown that the limit at
which a star supported only by electron degeneracy compresses to a
point is 1.44 solar masses. Other considerations related to the
internal physics of real stars can be shown to reduce the upper limit
for the mass of a White Dwarf star to ~1.2 solar masses.
So imagine a White Dwarf star of greater than the Sun's mass, bound to
a binary companion. If that companion swells enough for its outer
layers to be pulled across the space to the White Dwarf, then the WD
star could gain sufficient mass to go beyond Chandrasekhar's limit.
Stan Woosley of the University of California, Santa Cruz; and Kenichi
Nomoto and co-workers in Japan, have shown conclusively that a
carbon-oxygen White Dwarf with a mass of 1.2 solar masses can be torn
apart by a <
White Dwarves have been suspected as the progenitors of SNe Ia for
many years. Recent improvements in the capabilities of high speed
computers have made possible the detailed modeling necessary to
confirm them as the prime candidates. But many questions still
remain, awaiting future observations of supernovae with more sensitive
instrumentation to confirm or refute the work of the current
generation of theorists.
But beyond this, supernovae inspire and awe us. They are perhaps the
single most energetic events in the universe, representing the violent
destruction of a star and the concurrent creation and release into the
interstellar medium of all those elements heavier than Helium which
otherwise would not exist. The carbon which is the building block of
our flesh, and the iron in our blood, were forged in the fire of a
supernova long ago, along with the silicon which makes the sand of our
beaches and the rocks of our mountains; and the oxygen and nitrogen we
breathe.