Twenty Years of Market-based Instruments for Environmental Protection:

Has the Promise Been Realized?

 

Workshop

August 23-24, 2003

Donald Bren School of Environmental Science & Management

University of California, Santa Barbara

(Participation is by invitation only)

 

Organized by

 

Professor Jody Freeman

Professor of Law, School of Law, UCLA and

Associate Dean for Law and Policy, Bren School

 

&

 

Professor Charles Kolstad

Donald Bren Professor of Environmental Economics & Policy, Bren School

 

 

 

With financial support from

Environmental Economics & Policy Program, Bren School, UCSB

Environmental Law & Policy Program, Bren School, UCSB

Ralph and Goldy Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies, UCLA

Resources for the Future

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

 

 

 Efforts to comply with new federal environmental requirements during the decade of the 1980s yielded experimentation with market-based instruments (MBI) for pollution control, particularly in the U.S.  Then, in the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, a major program for trading sulfur emissions was introduced.  Additional trading programs for better managing natural resources followed, particularly as applied to fisheries.  Overall, the 1990s saw a tremendous expansion of MBI programs.

In 2002, the European Union decided to introduce the biggest trading program in the world: trading greenhouse gas reduction obligations.  These programs have generated a great deal of optimism and widespread acceptance of the superiority of MBI over command-and-control regulations for managing natural environments.  But what do the data from these programs tell us?

This workshop will examine our overall experience with MBI.  While there have been successes with MBI, there have also been failures.  Participants will explore the extent to which MBI programs have really delivered on their promise to produce environmental protection or abatement more efficiently than command-and-control regulation.   We will take a critical look at the empirical work done in the last two decades and see if the initial optimism about these mechanisms is still warranted.   Economists and legal scholars from around the world will participate, and the proceedings will be published in an edited volume.

 

AGENDA

 

SATURDAY, AUGUST 23, 2003

 

8:30-8:40 A.M.        Welcome

 

8:40-10:40 A.M.      SESSION I             

 

Robert N. Stavins (Harvard University) [Discussant: Dan Farber, Minnesota]

"Market-Based Environmental Policies:  "What Can We Learn from U.S. Experience and Related Research?"

 

Winston Harrington (Resources for the Future) [Disussant: David Driesen, Syracuse]

“International Experience with Competing Approaches to Environmental Policy:  Results From Six Paired Cases”

 

Thomas Tietenberg (Colby College) [Discussant: Jim Salzman, American University]

“The Tradable Permits Approach to Protecting the Commons: What Have we Learned?”

 

                   

10:40-11:00 A.M.    Coffee Break

 

11:00-1:00 P.M.      SESSION II            

                   

Nathaniel Keohane (Yale) [Discussant: Maureen Cropper, World Bank and Maryland]

"Environmental Impacts of Policy-Directed Technique Choice: The 1990 Clean Air Act and

the Distribution of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions"

 

Richard G. Newell (Resources for the Future)  [Discussant: Denny Ellerman, MIT]

"The U.S. Experience with the Market-based Phasedown of Lead in Gasoline"

 

Jim Salzman (American University) [Discussant: Jason Johnston]

“ “Net Loss” -- Instrument Choice in Wetlands Protection”

                   

1:00-1:45 P.M.        Lunch

 

1:45-3:45 P.M.        SESSION III           

 

Juan Pable Montero  (Universidad of Chile) [Discussant: JR DeShazo, UCLA]

“Tradeable Permits with Incomplete Monitoring: Theory and Evidence"

                   

David M. Driesen (Syracuse University College of Law) [Discussant: Magali Delmas, UCSB]

“Design, Trading, and Innovation”

 

Catherine Kling (Iowa State) [Discussant: Kathy Segerson, Connecticut]

"Command and Control vs Market Based Instruments in Agriculture"

 

 

3:45-4:00 P.M         Coffee Break

 

4:00-6:00 P.M.        SESSION IV                    

         

Denny Ellerman (MIT) [ Discussant: Nat Keohane, Yale]

“Are Tradeable Permits More Environmentally Effective than Command-and-Control?"

 

Peter Menell (UC Berkeley School of Law) [Discussant: Michael Gerrard, Arnold & Porter]                 

"The Municipal Solid Waste 'Crisis' in Retrospect: A Success Story for Market-Based Mechanisms."

 

Kathleen Segerson (University of Connecticut) [Discussant: Winston Harrington, RFF]

“An Assessment of Voluntary Approaches to Environmental Protection:  Evidence from the Clean Charles 2005 Project”

 

 

SUNDAY, AUGUST 24

 

 

9:00-11:00 P.M.      SESSION V

 

Jason Johnston (University of PA Law School) [Discussant: Richard Newell, RFF]

"Marketable Environmental Use Rights and the Location of Economic Activity: Trading, Tipping, and the New Economic Geography"

                                       

Daniel Farber (University of Minnesota) [Discussant: Peter Menell, UCB]

"Legal Constraints on Environmental Trading Systems"

 

Michael Gerrard (Arnold & Porter) [Discussant: Tom Tietenberg, Colby]

"The Pervasive and Sometimes Perverse Effects of Implicit Economic Incentives: A Practitioner's Perspective"

 

11:00—12:00          Wrap Up [Freeman and Kolstad]

 

 

Informational contact:  Theresa Benevento (theresa@mit.edu)

 

 

 

Last updated: Aug 12, 2003