CRITIQUE ARCHIVE

HOME   SYLLABUS

http://www.fool.com

By Karen Feigenbaum
[***½ out of *****]

Fool.com's purpose is not exactly clear when you first arrive at the site. There are links referencing IRAs and stocks, so one begins to suspect they have something to do with personal investment. After calming down from mentally overloading in reaction to the hyperlink-heavy homepage, it's somewhat easy to find the link asking the question that everyone who visits www.fool.com must be thinking: What's The Motley Fool?

According to the web-site, The Motley Fool's name "derives from Elizabethan drama, where only the court Jester (the "Fool") could tell the King the truth without getting his head lopped off." They continue by saying that they're "dedicated to educating, amusing, and enriching individuals in search of the truth." This site sounds great…but what the hell do they do? After the grand and auspicious opening, the web-site finally goes on to explain that they are dedicated to making the complexity of personal finances simple for the layperson, boasting that "this stuff isn't rocket science."

Demystifying the financial investment world is certainly a tempting offer. After all, investors often seem to be a fraternity comprised of people (typically white males, just like a fraternity) who have passed some kind of elite hazing ritual. Most of the world is still left on the outside looking in with fear, scorn, or envy, but with a definite sense of "otherness." Stocks and bonds and mutual funds, oh my! It's all so confusing.

Browsing through some of the site's more interesting-sounding links, it becomes obvious that The Motley Fool has taken a lesson from the "----- for Dummies" series of literature. They speak to the reader about complicated topic-matter in a manner that is neither over the heads of the uninformed nor condescending in a patronizing tone of voice. Sadly, the attempts at humor fall a touch short of the desired mark and ring a bit hokey and unprofessional. But, the site atones for such transgressions with useful, educational, and interesting content, such as something they have dubbed "Fool's School," which is a breakdown of investment basics must-know-how. They also allow for an easy entrance into the world of actual investing, including stock tip discussion groups, securities' historical data, and links to brokers.

While the web-site's purpose is admirable and quite practical for a large portion of the population, as a visitor, I'm left wondering about the its visibility. The name is esoteric, and it required a few moments worth of searching to determine The Motley Fool's actual intent. In a content-saturated universe, this site can (and may very well be) easily overlooked. But the concept around which it's built is sound, the aim is noble, and it's conceivable that the business plan is equally as solid (my guess is that they probably derive revenue from their recommended brokers). Unfortunately, if the site produces low click-through to these brokers, due to Fool's own potentially low traffic volume, their revenue stream can and probably will easily dry up.

My main suggestions would be to streamline the homepage such that the site's objective is clearly stated up front and also not obscured by an abundance of content hyperlinks.