CRITIQUE ARCHIVE

HOME   SYLLABUS

http://www.seniorworld.com/

SeniorWorld Online
By Max Van Kleek

Are today's Seniors only interested in topics related to issues of aging, recounting old stories, medicine and health, money management, and world travel? That is the impression one will get when visiting SeniorWorld Online. The SeniorWorld Online web site offers some useful information - but limits itself to topics one typically associates with STEREOTYPES of seniors.

It seems that the SeniorWorld site focuses too narrowly on topics people who are not themselves Seniors would too readily attribute as issues that seniors would find interesting. For example, in Health and Medicine, topics include Parkinson's Disease, Alzheimers, Health Care, and "Longevity", instead of perhaps more useful general links to in-depth professional online health resources. Under the News section, we are somewhat puzzled to find the section called "Senior Stories", where seniors can submit stories of their life experiences for perusal, presumably for their peers. This seems that it can hardly be considered

News to me. Even the Art and Entertainment section seems limited to turn-of-the-20th century silent films, banjo and Big Band music, which is entirely off-the-mark for what music most seniors would listen to. It became especially clear that SeniorWorld was missing its target audience upon perusal of the Life, Leisure and Sports section. Under this umbrella category, which seems to cover everything from Automotive Repair,
Computer tutorials, to Religion, lies the category "Relationships". Although this claims to be a section devoted to "the relationships that our lives revolve around and how to make the most of them", this link does not have a single resource devoted to senior dating, matchmaking, or marriage. By the statistics that Chris Weaver cited in lecture on March 16, we know that a very significant percentage of seniors above 60 are still actively dating; a fact that is surprising to most.

It is also disappointing that the SeniorWorld website does not design its pages to take into account seniors' possibly declining eyesight, motor coordination, and other disabilities. The web sites have a pastel color scheme, which, would be fine if they had focused on better layout and readability. The site neglects the readability of its articles, using standard-sized, non-antialiased fonts. Titles of sections are inconsistently aligned in a hodgepodge manner that might be confusing. Even more annoying are the box-banner ads that crowd the content and create visual noise on the entire right column of every page. Perhaps worst of all, most pages are far too long to fit on a single page, which means that they need to be scrolled (which is known to be abysmally bad, due to spatial- perception issues, for most seniors). The tightly-packed, crowded microfont "navigation bar" that at the very bottom of every page on the web site seems it would be challenging for even the slightly vision impaired, and entirely useless for most seniors visiting the site.

Buildling resources based upon stereotypes is a dangerous thing to do, particularly when aiming at large segments of the human population. Ann Wrixon from SeniorNET described having witnessed every Senior-related stereotype she had ever heard be shattered within her first couple months as CEO of SeniorNet, as she joined large groups of SeniorNET members on trips kayaking, dancing, and observed Seniors enthusiastically adopting computer technology, accessing the Internet, and teaching others how to do the same. Recognizing Seniors' real interests and issues has helped her company become the one of the most successful senior sites on the web; it seems that SeniorWorld needs to learn lessons from SeniorNet.