Magnetic Thin Films
Project Staff:
C.A. Ross, E. Friend, in collaboration with R.C. O'Handley
Sponsors:
National Science Foundation
Previous researchers have investigated the magnetic properties of
multilayer thin-film sandwiches of copper/nickel/ copper epitaxially
grown on silicon. In this system, the magnetic properties of the nickel
layer change drastically as the thickness (and therefore the amount
of strain) of the nickel layer varies, and it does so over a thickness
range that is uniquely broad. This effect is due to both the large
magnetoelastic energy and to the surface magnetocrystalline anisotropy
energy of the nickel film. Our research focuses on understanding the
effects of patterning these Cu/Ni/Cu films into nanoscale lines. Once
patterned, the strained films can relax at the edges, with the strain
relief being a function of line width and thickness. The ultimate
aims are to elucidate the relationship between stress and magnetic
properties in nanoscale features, to understand and control the effects
of stress on magnetic nanostructures, and to exploit this effect to
achieve desired magnetic properties. This understanding is a key part
of the development of future magnetic recording technologies such
as patterned recording media and read/write heads.
Magnetic characterization of Cu/Ni/Cu nanolines has shown that, contrary
to the expectations from shape anisotropy, the preferred magnetization
direction is transverse to the line direction in the sample plane.
This is due to strain relief in the nanoline across its width. Simulations
of strain in these structures have shed further light on the relation
between the nanoline cross-section aspect ratio and strain relief,
showing that strain is relaxed at the edges of the lines over a distance
of about 1.5 times the film thickness. Therefore narrower lines show
a greater magnetic anisotropy parallel to their width. Strain relief
is even greater in the case of overetch into the copper substrate.
Magnetic anisotropy data is being analyzed to understand how the net
anisotropy of the nanolines agrees with theoretical models.

Fig. 1. Electron micrograph of an array of 200 nm wide lines patterned
into a Cu 200 nm /Ni 6.9nm/Cu 5nm film deposited epitaxially on
a Si (100) substrate. The easy axis is in plane, perpendicular to
the lines, due to strain relaxation caused by patterning.

|