Masonic Symbols: Their Use and Abuse
Article: 10517 of alt.freemasonry
Subject: MASONIC SYMBOLS THEIR USE AND ABUSE
Date: 18 Nov 1995 20:38:08 GMT
Organization: Onramp Network Services Inc.
X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.)
This file is copyright (c) 1995 The Philalethes Society and all
rights including any redistribution rights are reserved by the copyright
holder. Permission to quote from, redistribute or to otherwise use these
materials must be obtained from the copyright holder directly by
contacting The Philalethes, Nelson King, FPS, Editor, 2 Knockbolt
Crescent, Agincourt Ontario Canada, M1S 2P6. Tel: 416-293-8071 Fax:
416-293-8634 or firstname.lastname@example.org
Masonic Symbols: Their Use and Abuse
(Delivered at the Annual Banquet of the Allied Masonic Degrees,
25 February 1995)
by Wallace McLeod, F.P.S.
Let's ponder the meaning of Masonic symbolism. We approach the topic
with diffidence, because a few years ago Allen Roberts wrote a superb
book called The Craft and its Symbols, that should be in the hands of
every Mason. So I shall steal some ideas from him, and borrow a few
words from myself, and see where it takes us.
Freemasonry is said to be "a beautiful system of morality, veiled in
allegory and illustrated by symbols." Allegory and symbol certainly
play a large role in it, but they are not restricted to it. If you have
a clear notion of how they work, you may find a deeper understanding of
Masonry and its meaning.
A symbol, according to the dictionary, is "something that stands for,
represents, or denotes something else (not by exact resemblance, but by
vague suggestion, or by some accidental or conventional relation)."
Some symbols occur so frequently in daily life that we have stopped
thinking of them as symbols.
The most familiar ones are the letters of the alphabet. There is no
reason why one kind of curling line should stand for a hissing noise, or
why something that looks like a couple of bee-hives side by side should
make a humming sound; but we all accept them without thinking. Other
symbols in common use include the numerals (1, 2, 3), mathematical and
monetary signs (plus, square root, dollar), and musical notation (treble
clef, flat, semiquaver). Such symbols are indispensable for almost any
kind of communication.
Another type of symbol is found in the arts, both graphic and verbal.
It represents something abstract by something that we can perceive with
our senses, above all by sight. So white stands for purity, the dove
and olive-branch for peace, the skull and crossbones for poison, and the
eagle for the United States.
In literature the symbol often occurs in combination with one of the
traditional figures of speech, simile, or metaphor. Robbie Burns tells
us that his sweetheart is beautiful to see and to hear, and he tells us
this by comparing her to other things.
O, my luve is like a red, red rose,
That's newly sprung in June.
O, my luve is like the melodie,
That's sweetly play'd in tune.
Shakespeare tells us that the problems of life are like the missiles
hurled by an attacking enemy, and that difficulties roll in upon us like
the waves of the ocean. That's the imagery behind the familiar
To be or not to be that is the question;
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them?
In a little poem by Walter Savage Landor, life is compared to and
symbolized by a warm fire.
I strove with none, for none was worth my strife.
Nature I loved, and after Nature, Art.
I warmed both hands before the fire of life.
It sinks, and I am ready to depart.
A symbol's associations go far beyond its simple pictorial meaning.
It can be used, not merely to facilitate thought, but even to shape it.
Who can be afraid of death if it is symbolized by putting out to sea, as
in Tennyson's familiar words?
Sunset and evening star,
And one clear call for me!
And may there be no moaning of the bar
When I put out to sea.
Who can be afraid of death if it is symbolized by falling asleep, as
in Bryant's Thanatopsis?
So live, that when thy summons comes to join
The innumerable caravan which moves
To that mysterious realm, where each shall take
His chamber in the silent halls of death,
Thou go not like the galley-slave at night,
Scourged to his dungeon, but sustained and soothed
By an unfaltering trust, approach thy grave
Like one who wraps the drapery of his couch
About him, and lies down to pleasant dreams.
For the Freemason, every character, figure, and emblem has a moral
tendency, and serves to inculcate the practice of virtue in all its
genuine professors. The principal rounds of Jacob's ladder are faith,
hope, and charity. Chalk, charcoal, and clay stand for freedom,
fervency, and zeal. The square represents morality, the level equality,
and the plumb rule justness and uprightness of life and conduct. The
three pillars are wisdom, strength, and beauty. An ear of corn near a
stream of water is plenty. The four tassels are temperance, fortitude,
prudence, and justice. The five steps are the five noble orders of
architecture, and also the five senses. The seven steps represent the
seven liberal arts and sciences. All these symbols are explicitly
defined in the ritual, and I suppose we are obliged to accept these
definitions, and are not at liberty to disagree.
But the symbols are not always explained for us. If you have a flair
for interpreting them, there is ample scope to indulge your talents.
There's no harm in that. It may help you in your personal development.
But how far can we go? Let's look at a few examples of how the
symbols have been read by others. There's a book by Foster Bailey,
called The Spirit of Masonry. He tells us that the three degrees can
foretell the future: having passed through the Entered Apprentice or
physical age, and the Fellow Craft or intellectual age, we now stand at
the threshold of the Master Mason or spiritual age; a new revelation
will soon restore to us the true lost word. Moreover, we learn, the two
great pillars represent the constellation Gemini; so the Craft began in
the Age of Gemini, more than 6500 years ago.
Or there's another book, by Arthur Ward, entitled Masonic Symbolism
and the Mystic Way. There we learn about the Working Tools of the
Entered Apprentice: the chisel stands for intellect, the common gavel
for will, and the twenty-four inch gauge for vital feeling. This is not
what the English ritual says; it says that they stand for accuracy,
labor, and perseverance. When we push on to the Second Degree, Ward
tells us that the Working Tools "are essentially the same powers, but in
the intense and spiritual form possessed by the higher Self within; they
are reached and shared by the personal man in the practice of
meditation." So the plumb rule turns out to be spiritual insight, the
square is spiritual intuition, and the level is spiritual inspiration.
Again, that's not what the ritual says.
A few years ago W. Kirk MacNulty wrote Freemasonry: A Journey through
Ritual and Symbol. He says that the three Craft degrees recapitulate
the development of the individual person, and encourage further
development. The Entered Apprentice Degree (or the Ground Floor of the
Temple) represents the physical or material being, Jung's "individual
consciousness." The Fellow Craft (or Middle Chamber) represents the
soul or psyche, Jung's "personal unsconscious." The Master Mason (or
Holy of Holies) is the spiritual being, Jung's "collective
unsconscious," one step closer to the Divine.
And non-Masons can shed light on our symbolism. A fascinating study
by Katharine Thomson, called The Masonic Thread in Mozart, tells us that
"the number three has a special significance in Freemasonry. Most of
the songs are in three-part harmony.... Many songs are in triple time;
threefold repetitions are frequent, and major triads are of particular
importance.... In Mozart's music certain keys are specifically
associated with Freemasonry, notably Eb major ... [with] the key
signature of three flats."
Other Mozart specialists argue that The Magic Flute is clearly a
Masonic opera. They note the three chords repeated three times, the
three attendants of the Queen of the Night, the three boys, the three
doors, the three trials, and so on.
Besides these familiar published sources, you will find that
sometimes an older and respected Mason has his own interpretation of
some of the symbols, arising out of his knowledge and experience. More
than one mature brother has disclosed to me that, no matter what we say,
Freemasonry is fundamentally Christian, because the equilateral triangle
is an emblem of divinity, and it can refer only to the Christian
It may well be so. These examples are all personal interpretations.
Can we take them as correct?
Arthur Ward says, "If you find a key which translates a cypher
message into sense, you know for certain that you have the key of the
cypher; similarly, if you find an explanation which makes sense of a
series of symbols you have their true meaning." This is the problem.
If we accept subjective interpretations by Masons, how can we exclude
subjective interpretations by non-Masons?
In the Masonic ritual, God is called "the Great Architect of the
Universe." For me, this is a simple metaphor; the universe is like an
immense mansion or temple, and the Creator of the universe is compared
to the builder. Nothing secret or disrespectful about that! But in
1986 a Canadian religious magazine called The Presbyterian Record
published an attack on Freemasonry, saying that the Great Architect of
the Universe was the name of the false god "that the Masons worship at
their altar." And two years ago, Dr James Larry Holly, the man who
orchestrated the Southern Baptist campaign against the Masons, said that
to call God a Great Architect "is derogatory to the True God's creative
omnipotence. An architect only puts together from the materials already
at hand. God creates from nothing."
Actually a bit of research discloses that the term "Great Architect"
was introduced into Freemasonry in 1723 by the Presbyterian minister,
James Anderson, and that he got it from the works of John Calvin, one of
the founders of Presbyterianism. The modern dogmatists are attacking an
expression that was used by one of the great theologians of all
We all know that the square and compasses form a symbol that stands
for Masonry. But there's more to it than that. The fundamentalist
Pastor Ron Carlson, who has spoken about Freemasonry in evangelical
churches in many parts of America, says that the square represents the
earth, the compasses represent the sky, and the square and compasses
when united represent the sky impregnating the earth with its showers;
that is, they represent sexual intercourse.
But there is more to come. There's a man called Ed Decker, who has
written a book called What you need to Know About ... Masons. And in it
he tells us that the evil square and compasses are permanently enshrined
in the plan of this city. I quote: "Take any good street map of
downtown Washington D.C. and find the Capitol Building.... The left leg
[of the compasses] is represented by Pennsylvania Avenue and the right
leg by Maryland Avenue. The Square is found ... with the intersection
of Canal Street and Louisiana Avenue. The left leg of the Compass
stands on the White House and the right leg stands on the Jefferson
Memorial.... On top of the White House is an inverted five-pointed
star.... The point rests squarely on the White House.... The center of
the pentagram is 16th Street where, 13 blocks due north of the very
center of the White House, the Masonic House of the Temple sits at the
top." This must show that the Masons have been running the country
since the beginning!
The same writer tells us that, when the new Mason says he wants
"Light," and it is given to him at the command of the Worshipful Master,
this is wrong, because Light is salvation, and comes only through Jesus.
See John 8:12: "I am the light of the world; he that followeth me shall
not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life." And again, Dr
Holly, whom we just mentioned, speaks about Masonic light: "This is
blasphemous," he says. "Jesus Christ is the Light of the World. No
other light is revealed in the Word of God." Pretty strong
Pat Robertson, in his book The New World Order, says that the Masonic
All-Seeing Eye is found in the Great Seal of the United States on the
back of the dollar bill. This, he tells us, is "the eye of an ancient
Egyptian deity, Osiris, who is revered in ... the sacred rites of the
Masonic Order." It follows that Masonry still preserves the pagan
mysteries, and is incompatible with Christianity or Judaism, because the
All-Seeing Eye belongs to an Egyptian god.
And you will be aware that a number of these people are convinced
that the truncated pyramid, likewise found on the reverse of the dollar,
in fact points to the International Masonic conspiracy to take over the
world, because it corresponds to a symbol that was used by the
Illuminati of Bavaria in the 1770s.
These interpretations are every bit as plausible as the others, but
they are all contrary to the spirit of Masonry as it is reflected in the
symbols that are explained in the ritual, and they are all
There is a real problem here. If a symbol in one part of the world
resembles another in a different part of the world, does that mean they
are related, or that they mean the same thing? If we look at an ancient
Greek statue, and see that its pose resembles a modern Masonic gesture,
does that mean that it portrays a Mason? If we find that the Egyptian
pharaoh Tutankhamen was buried wearing an apron, does that mean he was a
Mason? I could refer you to written texts that say he was. To me, this
is obviously preposterous, and I decline to discuss it further.
But in the very same way, the anti-Masons confuse similarity with
identity, and accept only one interpretation for any symbol. We noted
that Pat Robertson objects to the All-Seeing Eye, because it is pagan.
I can't help wondering if his Bible includes the words, "The eyes of the
Lord are in every place, beholding the evil and the good" (Proverbs
15:3), or "The eyes of the Lord run to and fro throughout the whole
earth" (2 Chronicles 16:9). This sounds to me as if the God of the
Bible also has an all-seeing eye!
We noted that several of these people object to the new Mason asking
for "Light," because light can only be the salvation of Jesus Christ.
But the Bible itself uses light in various senses. It can stand for
life: "Wherefore is light given to him that is in misery, and life unto
the bitter in soul?" (Job 3:20). It can represent joy and prosperity:
"Light is sown for the righteous, and gladness for the upright in heart"
(Psalm 97:11). It can mean moral excellence: "The path of the just is
as the shining light.... The way of the wicked is as darkness"
And of course in literature light means many things, and its precise
application is derived from the immediate context. In a poem by Arthur
Hugh Clough, light clearly means hope, in time of despair, that the
future will be brighter:
And not by eastern windows only,
When daylight comes, comes in the light.
In front the sun climbs slow, how slowly,
But westward, look, the land is bright.
In general, warmth, light, fire, and day regularly stand for "life."
But at one point in Paradise Lost Milton calls upon Light to help him.
This is appropriate in a literal sense, because his story is moving from
the gloomy realm of Satan to the ethereal brightness of Heaven. We are
also reminded that Milton, because of his blindness, could not see the
light like other men. But finally we learn that here the light is
symbolic, and represents poetic insight.
Shine inward, and the mind through all her parts
Irradiate; there plant eyes, all mist from thence
Purge and dispose, that I may see and tell
Of things invisible to mortal sight.
In the educational world, the lamp of learning clearly represents
knowledge. And so too in Masonry, in the First Degree the darkness is
the darkness of ignorance and the light is the light of knowledge; in
the Third, it is the darkness of death. It is stupid and dishonest of
the Fundamentalists to say that "light," wherever it occurs, must be the
salvation of Jesus Christ.
In Masonry, the symbols need not be consistent, but they can stand
for different things. The twenty-four-inch gauge can represent the
twenty-four-hour day, and also accuracy. The square stands for
morality, but also for the Worshipful Master.
Should we go on and worry about numerical symbolism? Obviously the
Masons are not the sole owners of certain numerals. Is the number three
Masonic? Consider: Three Little Pigs, Three Blind Mice, Goldilocks and
the Three Bears, Three Men in a Boat, Three Musketeers, Three Stooges,
Three Coins in a Fountain, Three-penny Opera, Three strikes and you're
out. Are these all Masonic?
Or again, what about five? We hear of a Five-act play, the Five
Books of Moses, Five Nations of the Iroquois Confederacy, the Fifth
Amendment, the five-sided building known as the Pentagon, the five
athletic contests of the Pentathlon, five o'clock shadow, five Great
Lakes. Are these all Masonic?
Or shall we worry about seven? Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs,
Seven League Boots, Seven Pillars of Wisdom, Dance of the Seven Veils,
Seven Brides for Seven Brothers, Seven-Percent Solution, Seven Wonders
of the World, Seven Hills of Rome, Seven Years War, and the Seven Seas.
Are these all Masonic?
Or should we brood about music? We mentioned a few minutes ago that
the key-signature of Eb was particularly Masonic, because it has three
flats. So I looked through the hymn-book, and discovered that, not only
"Abide with me," but also "Be Thou my vision," and "O happy is the man
who hears" are Masonic. Or, when we turn to an old song book, so are
"Believe me if all those endearing young charms," "Drink to me only with
thine eyes," and "Shenandoah." Do we believe that?
I am prepared to say that every Mason may interpret the symbols as he
wishes, provided that they are not explicitly explained in the ritual in
some other fashion. It can help the individual Mason in his spiritual
growth or moral evolution. But I do not believe that he should attempt
to impose his own interpretations on other Masons as if they were gospel
truth, and cannot be denied. In my more intolerant moments I apply the
name "mystical nuts" to such people. And there are a lot of them. I
think of Foster Bailey, and Albert Churchward, and Manly P. Hall, and A.
E. Waite, and Arthur Ward. My advice would be to avoid them like the
Do you see the nature of the problem? I'm prepared to agree with
Foster Bailey that one of the functions of Freemasonry is "the erection
of our spiritual temple." Indeed, we are told in one part of the
ceremonies, "From the foundation laid this evening, may you raise a
superstructure perfect in its parts and honorable to the builder." But
the precise way in which this is to be done is not, in my opinion,
specifically taught in Freemasonry. The brotherhood is explicitly
intended to be a group of men of high ideals and moral purpose, who
believe in the omniscience, omnipotence, and omnipresence of a Supreme
Being, who have shared certain deeply moving experiences, and who are
striving, each in his own way, to improve himself, and to make the world
a better place in which to live. Because of these common beliefs and
experiences, Freemasonry is in effect an affinity group, a group of men
who enjoy each other's company.
Interpret the symbols how you wish, by all means. But, unless the
interpretation is confirmed in the ritual, be very careful about what
you tell others. And don't let the Anti-Masons shove a false
interpretation down your throat.
- Foster Bailey, The Spirit of Masonry (Tunbridge Wells, 1957).
- Ed Decker, What you need to Know About ... Masons (Eugene, Oregon,
- James L. Holly, The Southern Baptist Convention and Freemasonry
(Beaumont, Texas, 1992; vol. 2, 1993).
- W. Kirk MacNulty, Freemasonry: A Journey through Ritual and Symbol
- W. McLeod, ed., Beyond the Pillars (Hamilton, Ont., 1973).
- W. McLeod, The Grand Design (Highland Springs, Va., 1991).
- Allen Roberts, The Craft and its Symbols (Richmond, 1974).
- Pat Robertson, The New World Order (Dallas, 1991).
- Katharine Thomson, The Masonic Thread in Mozart (London, 1977).
- Arthur Ward, Masonic Symbolism and the Mystic Way (London,
# Nelson King, FPS
# The Philalethes
# The International Masonic Research Society
Up to A Page About
Freemasonry main page.
A Page About Freemasonry is http://web.mit.edu/dryfoo/Masonry/