Method of Measure?
From: "Dan Tice" <email@example.com>
Subject: One day classes
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 02:49:05 +0000
I am a FC at Unity #48 in Geneva, IL, surfing the net to avoid
studying my catechism...
I was made an EA on August 24, 2006, and passed to the degree of
Fellowcraft on August 1, 2007. I probably actually exemplify the
"too-busy" and "stretched" demographic to which the "one-day classes"
are aimed. After about 6 months, I was actually approached by a couple
of officers about attending such a class. I refused this offer, saying
that I understood that these rituals, through the process of experience,
would help make me a better person for going through them. Since I
always see room for self-improvement, why would I want to skip that?
Fortunately, our lodge normally meets on the first degree (some sort
of dispensation, which I do not know the details of...), so I've been a
very regular attender, even if a slow learner!
Others in my lodge have attended such classes, and they seem happy
with them. My (admittedly poorly informed) view is that the worth of
such a one-day class is based on what the candidate wants from
freemasonry: I am very interested in the ritual and moral lessons of
freemasonry, so I think I would have been unhappy with the one-day
class. Others seem more interested in getting involved and the social
aspects of freemasonry, and they might be happier with the one-day
It might seem that my email is an attempt to say yes to both side of
this debate, but it is not meant to. It is actually an attempt to
address the question of the method of measure. I wrote because I wanted
to give my answer to why I chose the path I did -- that is, I
articulated why I am more interested in the traditional method, and that
was due to a belief in the power of a ritual to make a difference. That
belief makes me something of an anachronism in this day and age, so I
don't think I can safely apply that to all masons. When the set of
officers in my lodge told me about the one-day class, they mentioned
that they had found that masons who went through that class were just as
likely to remain members and be active in masonry as masons who had
followed the traditional method. That was their method of measure. I
think it would help clarify the question and make clearer what we mean
by "better" if we answered the question, "What are the methods of
measure by which we determing the worth of one-day classes vs. the
Thank you for your time and consideration!
Up to "One-Day Class" main page
All the way UP to A Page About Freemasonry main
A Page About Freemasonry is http://web.mit.edu/dryfoo/Masonry/