Extranets - A New Computing Paradigm


Author: Don Hunter


This document pertains to the current state of extranet technology and applications. Click here for related websites.


This paper analyzes what types of extranets are currently being deployed by U.S. corporations. It also offers a very brief examination of who the software and hardware providers are, and what the products and services are that they offer. The definition of "extranet" is broad and varied. Previously, they were known as Virtual Private Networks (VPN's) and were promoted by firewall and router vendors; however, they encountered logistical and security problems (14). Early examples of companies linking up with their external contacts included combinations of private and point-to-point networks, electronic bulletin boards, and advanced client- server groupware. However, these systems often brought as many problems as solutions, since they were difficult to use, costly to implement, and users were often reluctant to share knowledge (11). At present, I think that the most useful definition of an extranet is as follows: an external network that reaches out to people who may physically work outside the firewall but who are an important part of the business strategy, product-delivery system, or customer-support apparatus. For additional ways that extranets have been defined in the literature, see Exhibit 1 . However one defines them, extranets represent an important trend. Zona Research reports that companies will spend $41.9 billion on Internet and intranet hardware, software, services, and connectivity in 1999, which represents a nearly four-fold increase from 1996 spending (3). John Englund, vice president of the Information Technology Association of America (ITAA),located in Arlington, VA, says that in 1997 we should "[l]ook for more companies to increase connections with their partners' intranets to improve communications" (1). However, the date 2000 problem, with the resultant need to modify existing applications, is one factor that is slowing down intranet/extranet investments by corporations(3). One of the most important organizational design issues managers will face during the next decade is that of using extranets and software to augment or reduce the need for enterprise intermediaries (17). A major question remains: do IS executives have the business and political savvy to become effective players in this new value-creation paradigm (17)? As to cost or revenue benefits of extranets, I did not get a precise, quantitative sense of how companies were benefiting from this technology. They were positive about what their extranets allowed them to do, in terms of reducing product delivery times and improving coordination among their external contacts. However, they were reluctant to disclose specific details regarding actual revenue increases or cost savings. It seems to me that they were holding back because they viewed the advantages of these extranets as proprietary competitive information. For a general list of the benefits provided by extranets, see Exhibit 2. Although in the past it has been unusual for such technologies to provide immediate payoffs, extranets appear to be an exception to the rule (11).

First, I will describe specific examples of what companies are doing with extranet technology. These applications can be used to solve problems and streamline processes in areas such as marketing, human resources, sales and distribution, finance, engineering, and customer service (6). CoreStates Bank is currently designing an online bank customer services system; it has engaged World Star Holdings, Ltd. to implement its VPAGE (tm) technology to provide client-level security for this system. This represents a part of the bank's general plan to provide online access to a wide array of value-added services to its business and individual customers. This system will be capable of identifying, authenticating, and distinguishing between different types of customers. This will allow them to safely access user-specific content provided by the bank and thereby take advantage of secure, customized, fully-transactional services adapted to their unique requirements (2).

Netscape is an example of a company that practices what it preaches. Because Netscape's product is easily distributed over the Internet, it can market, sell, distribute, and collect for its products within the same medium. By putting its software on the Internet, and letting customers download it and provide feedback, Netscape is able to debug and improve its products (5).

By June, Ford Motor Company will deploy its FocalPt extranet network, a system that supports the sales and servicing of automobiles. This network will provide the more than 15,000 Ford dealers worldwide with promotional, inventory, and financial information to facilitate closing a deal. In the past, this kind of information has only resided in printed form, and has thus not been readily accessible. This new system uses Web browsers to present sales and promotional literature, including video clips to help prospective customers obtain financing. Dealers will also be able to keep track of repair records and customer preferences. Ford does not require that dealers purchase this technology, which they can buy from any of three systems integrators. One concern that I have regarding this approach is that if a dealer is already profitable and satisfied with his/her profit margins, there may be little motivation for him/her to invest in such a system. As far as the specific technology used by the FocalPt network, each dealership will receive a system designed by SoftAd, Inc. in Mill Valley, CA. This will include a PC server running windows NT, Microsoft Corp.'s Internet Information Server, and as many multimedia desktop PCs as they need. These desktops will run Microsoft's Internet Explorer browser. Communication between the dealers and Ford will be through FordStar, a satellite-based TCP/IP network that already exists for transmitting business information between Ford and its dealers. Information is distributed using Internet middleware from Way-farer Communications, Inc. in Mountain View, CA (18).

GMAC Commercial Mortgage and its sister company, GMAC Mortgage Corp., needed to update their network because the old system, an aging 16M bit/s shared Token Ring LAN, could not support the required load. Recently, GMAC set up Investor Query, a service which will allow investors to log-on to GMAC's intranet through a World Wide Web page. The entire package was leased from 3Com Corp.; it consists of a 100M bit/s Fast Ethernet backbone connected to 25 Fast Ethernet hubs that deliver dedicated 100M bit/s service to users' desktops. This extranet will enable investors to use the Internet to obtain loan-level detail on all the loans that GMAC services for them, plus occupancy rates, inspections, and pictures of the properties. By filling out an electronic form, which will be routed to GMAC's inspection contractors, investors will be able to request a property inspection over the Web. After the inspection, the contractors will log-in to GMAC's intranet and report their findings, as well as upload digital photos. This process is expected to reduce the time to file an inspection to investors from a week to two days or less. Another advantage of this system is that employees will gain access to videotaped training and television broadcasts, which will be transmitted across the network by Star-light Networks, Inc.'s StarWorks media server (12).

Enhanced Product Realization (EPR), is a joint undertaking between Denver, Colorado-based InfoTest International, an alliance of high-tech companies and organizations, and the U.S. government (16). This project will set up a real-world system for "virtual product design and supply chain management" that will allow manufacturers, suppliers, and customers to work together on-line anywhere in the world; the project will also study the costs and benefits of such a system (4). InfoTest International is a private consortium devoted to developing practical internet testing applications. The InfoTest members who are participating in the EPR project include: 3M; Bay Networks; Caterpillar; Digital Equipment Corp.; Global Commerce Link LLC; Hewlett-Packard Co.; Hughes Electronics; IBM Corp.; the Institute for Defense Analyses; Sprint; Texas Instruments; the US General Services Administration; and Lawrence Livermore, Oak Ridge and Sandia National Laboratories (16). The EPR extranet is expected to give American manufacturers an enormous competitive advantage in the global marketplace (4, 16). This system will let participating companies collaborate confidentially on manufacturing matters such as customer requests for product enhancements. The goal is to distribute decision-making while using technologies that are more interoperable and less costly than those employed on traditional private networks. The nationwide trial will involve Internet technologies such as the World Wide Web, as well as computer-assisted design and manufacturing, product data management, electronic data interchange, videoconferencing and other more traditional technologies. EPR is expected to prove that the Internet can greatly shrink product time to market and customer response times. Furthermore, virtual private networks over the Internet will cost about 30% less than using telephone company leased lines. EPR will use the Distributed Computing Environment security standards and router-based Internet Protocol encryption from Bay Networks, Inc. This reservation protocol will allow Internet Service providers to offer users guaranteed bandwidth (4).

Finally, Turner Broadcasting Sales Inc. (TBSI), the advertising arm of Turner Broadcasting Systems Inc., has deployed a business-to-business intranet (i.e. an extranet) that solves the age-old problem in the advertising community of how to give ad executives the information they need to make buying decisions for their clients, without flooding them with useless data. With this new technology, ad agencies no longer have to plow through mountains of paper dealing with programming, demographics, ratings, and promotional opportunities to find a fit. "The advantage is that it saves unnecessary phone calls and really will save time," says Mike Mulieri, vice president and group supervisor of the broadcasting, buying, and programming group at Young and Rubicam Inc., a New York agency where Turner Mania is being beta-tested. Because there is no proprietary information on the Turner Mania Web site, and since Turner wishes to make this site as accessible as possible, there is no firewall and the network employs only basic password security. Both large and small companies will have the same timely information and opportunity to best serve their clients, since all will be given access to this extranet. The set-up of Turner Mania will allow ad executives to obtain the specific information they need, as well as encourage them to think of other ways they could advertise their clients' products. Furthermore, Turner plans to gather information about these ad executives themselves; it will track basic hit rates to assess the frequency with which pages are accessed, as well as who is accessing them. This information will allow TBSI to improve its services. Lastly, TBSI realized the missing piece was a clearinghouse mechanism that would give ad agencies access to the information they actually needed, not just what their internal contacts thought they might require. The TBSI group selected a third-party developer, Information and Imagination Inc. (i3). During the initial implementation of this project, i3 will continue to house the stand-alone Digital Equipment Corporation Prioris HX 590DP dual-Pentium server with 96 Mbytes of RAM, on which the site now resides (7).

Now that I have discussed examples of how U.S. corporations are employing extranet technology, I will consider the technology providers who make these systems possible. According to Earl Galleher, vice president and general manager of Internet Server Products with Digex, an Internet carrier and Web site management company in Beltsville, MD, extranet hosting could be a very profitable business for integrators and ISP's (9). Microsoft Corp. and Netscape Communications Corp. are both attempting to get as many ISP's and integrators as possible using their respective technologies. These companies are refining their messages as they battle for mind and market share for business-to-business communications over the Internet. This past February, Netscape unveiled a Virtual Intranet demonstration on its Web site, which allows users to browse selected data at a fictitious site called Airius Aircraft (9). In addition, in order to facilitate enterprise application development, Netscape is providing more than 20 different reusable intranet applications, with source code, in the AppFoundry section of its Web site (6). According to an integrator source, Netscape is decoupling its Transaction server from its Merchant Server so that the former may be released as a separate product. This is an example of Netscape's increasing focus on EDI and transaction services (9). Moreover, by the third quarter Netscape, in partnership with Actra/General Electric, will add an EDI component to its Transaction Server, as well as release additional gateways to its LivePayment server (9). Netscape also recently announced a partnership with Deutsche Telekom AG, a German distributor, under which Telekom will help deliver extranet technologies to customers (9).

As far as Microsoft is concerned, it will soon roll out a new version of its Commercial Internet System, code-named Normandy, that will be thoroughly integrated with Exchange, Microsoft Transaction Server, and the rest of the BackOffice suite. According to Russ Stockdale, group product manager with Microsoft's Personal and Business System group, the "Internet Information Server and Transaction Server will become the new foundation for Merchant," Microsoft's electronic-commerce server that is part of its Commercial Internet System (9).

Internet Service Providers (ISP's) market extranets as services, instead of hardware or software. The ISP's install and lease the necessary equipment, saving the customer hardware costs as well as the costs related to leased lines or frame-relay circuits. These extranets employ encryption and authentication for security; the vendors offer guaranteed availability as well as integration with existing networks (14) For example, UUNET Technologies, Inc. provides the hardware and software for other companies to implement their extranets. This ISP recently introduced a service which allows companies to make their intranets accessible to suppliers, customers and remote employees. A central component of the service is a combination firewall and router, which UUNET will install at customer sites to provide security and let customers prioritize intranet traffic. Chris Stevens, an analyst at Aberdeen Group, Inc. in Boston, points out that prioritizing access to its extranet could be an important business tool for a company trying to provide key business partners with special attention. Alan Taffel, vice president of marketing and business development at UUNET says that "extranet services will provide the user with the economies of the Internet, quality of service, end-to-end security, and remote access support that has not been available before." UUNET is the first ISP to roll out an extranet service; judging by customer demand, others will likely follow (15).

Now that I have considered examples of companies who are deploying extranets, as well as those who are providing the extranet technology, I will move on to consider the lessons I have learned from this analysis. See Exhibit 3 for a list of general considerations when developing an extranet. One valuable source of information that I uncovered while sifting through the literature was Mainspring Communications . Mainspring's interactive service provides decision-essential information on key topics such as security, development tools, electronic commerce, outsourcing, and managing upgrades. It also includes referral directories of solutions providers, plus an electronic community for peer-to-peer communication. Individual members can subscribe to the service for $495 a year, whereas corporations will receive volume discounts. This puts Mainspring among the pioneers of subscription-based business-to-business services on the Web (3).

Another lesson I learned was that since it is not possible to predict to whom a company might wish to give access to its extranet in the future, it is vital that these applications be built for the broadest possible connectivity (i.e., the Internet). Important questions to ask when developing an extranet include: "What if partners, customers, or prospects outside the firewall could tap into this?" or "What if employees outside the original department that built this system had access to this?" (5). As for security, the best approach is to place firewalls on your network among groups or segments, whichever makes sense. Then, starting with a firewall configuration that lets nothing through, begin enabling specific protocols and connections. This is an improvement upon the method of whittling down connections after first allowing the broadest possible connectivity, since it lessens the chance that one would inadvertently miss something (10).

In addition to security, there are cultural obstacles to overcome when setting up an extranet (13). Each company that has agents and intermediaries doing sales and support will have to grapple with the issue of what role IS will play in either disintermediating the middlemen or adding value to them. There is an increasing trend within IS departments towards the design of information structures that reduce either the power or the value of various enterprise intermediaries. Instead, IS departments are designing information structures that directly add value to customers (17). However, as digital technologies diffuse throughout multiple marketplaces, it is important to consider who are the appropriate customers for IS. Internal clients? Or the real customers? Companies will have to decide whether it makes more sense to give software to their insurance agents or their insurance agents' customers, their brokers or their brokers' clients, their tech support people or the people they support (4).

Lastly, process was a major consideration cited in several of the examples. I feel that this point is very important, because technology does not miraculously solve business problems. Companies are still required to seriously contemplate the changes that must first be made in their business processes, before they can take full advantage of this new technology (4, 9).

In conclusion, it seems that I should consider whether extranets represent new technology, or are actually just a marketing twist on the Internet concept. According to Mark Gibbs, the term "extranet" was coined by Netscape's Marc Andreesen, who appeared on "The Charlie Rose Show" on Oct. 16, 1996. The term is meant to denote a Web server that handles confidential intranet content and communications that will be made accessible to business partners and customers via the Internet. This author says that an extranet is the same as a Web server with secure content. Gibbs also asserts that "concocting yet another term for a completely normal function of an intranet or any other system confuses end-user organizations. We don't need a special name for every variation and attribute of IT systems." I somewhat agree with Gibbs, but I think it is important to think of extranets and intranets as separate entities. Although the author suggests that these companies are just trying to put a marketing spin on Internet applications, the extranet represents a set of different product offerings and services, and is thus more than just a marketing term. I also believe the term "extranet" is helpful conversationally when considering giving external parties access to enterprise systems. The term should engender a deeper level of consideration and concern regarding maintaining security and managing external relationships. Perhaps Gibbs does not see the value of creating a term to describe this specific phenomenon, since he is a reporter and not a businessman or technologist (10). Finally, extranet technology seems to be the wave of the future. This new paradigm will help companies to achieve new levels of flatness, flexibility, networking, global reach, and diversity.