Quality of Teaching 2.9/5.0

Difficulty 3.0/5.0

Time Spent 40.0/40 hrs

Response Rate: 20/171

Results by Category

• Quality of Teaching
• Text and Other Readings
• Exams
• Problem Sets
• Subject Overall

Quality of Teaching

	Alyssa P. Hacker	Ben Bitdiddle	Felix Mendelssohn	J.S. Bach	Robert Schumann
Relevant presentations	3.1	2.6	3.2	2.9	3.0
Explains clearly	3.1	3.2	3.4	2.6	3.1
Uses blackboard well	2.8	3.3	2.9	2.7	2.7
Speaks clearly	3.0	3.2	3.0	2.8	2.9
Arouses interest in subject	3.2	3.1	3.0	2.8	3.1
Available outside class	3.3	2.6	2.5	3.0	2.8
Overall rating	2.6	3.2	3.2	3.0	2.9

	Alyssa P. Hacker	J.S. Bach	John Doe
Relevant presentations	2.8	3.3	3.3
Explains clearly	3.4	2.8	3.0
Uses blackboard well	2.8	2.7	2.9
Speaks clearly	2.4	2.5	2.5
Arouses interest in subject	2.6	3.6	2.4
Available outside class	3.0	3.5	3.1
Overall rating	3.0	2.9	2.8

Text and Other Readings

Useful

Yes	61 (31.0%)
No	67 (34.0%)
N/A	69 (35.0%)

Too easy/difficult (1=too easy, 5=too difficult)

Average: 3.1	1	52 (16.6%)
	2	60 (19.2%)
	3	47 (15.0%)
	4	68 (21.7%)
	5	60 (19.2%)
	N/A	26 (8.3%)

Exams

Relevant

Yes	26 (22.4%)
No	52 (44.8%)
N/A	38 (32.8%)

Too few/many (1=too few, 5=too many)

Average: 2.8	1	48 (19.8%)
	2	65 (26.7%)
	3	28 (11.5%)
	4	40 (16.5%)
	5	34 (14.0%)
	N/A	28 (11.5%)

Too easy/difficult (1=too easy, 5=too difficult)

Average: 3.0	1	56 (17.3%)
	2	67 (20.7%)
	3	35 (10.8%)
	4	54 (16.7%)
	5	65 (20.1%)
	N/A	47 (14.5%)

Problem Sets

Relevant

Yes	76 (30.9%)
No	99 (40.2%)
N/A	71 (28.9%)

Too few/many (1=too few, 5=too many)

Average: 3.2	1	24 (7.9%)
	2	73 (23.9%)
	3	46 (15.1%)
	4	45 (14.8%)
	5	61 (20.0%)
	N/A	56 (18.4%)

Too easy/difficult (1=too easy, 5=too difficult)

Average: 2.9	1	80 (22.4%)
	2	56 (15.7%)
	3	42 (11.8%)
	4	55 (15.4%)
	5	64 (17.9%)
	N/A	60 (16.8%)

Subject Overall

Pace too slow/fast (1=too slow, 5=too fast)

Average: 2.8	1	70 (26.9%)
	2	40 (15.4%)
	3	61 (23.5%)
	4	38 (14.6%)
	5	51 (19.6%)

Hours in class per week

Average: 14.0

Hours in lab per week

Average: 15.2

Hours on homework per week

Average: 9.7

Overall rating poor/excellent (1=very poor, 5=excellent)

Average: 2.9	1	70 (29.7%)
	2	23 (9.7%)
	3	59 (25.0%)
	4	30 (12.7%)
	5	54 (22.9%)

Graded fairly

Yes	59 (54.1%)
No	50 (45.9%)

Organized

Yes	52 (47.7%)
No	57 (52.3%)

Appropriate technology

Yes	69 (76.7%)
No	21 (23.3%)

Copyright © 1999 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Document created: Sun Jan 10 23:00:41 EST 1999 Comments to jgrucza@mit.edu