Draft: Version 2.0
July 27, 2003
R.A.Brown
Introduction
In November 2002 the MIT Council on Family and Work reported to the faculty on the results from the Quality of Life Survey that pertained to the faculty. This survey found that faculty believe that the pace and pressure of being a faculty member at MIT have increased substantially over the last decades and that the workload at MIT is greater than at other leading research universities. The survey also found that there are gender and generational gaps in faculty members' perceptions of pace and pressure, with women and younger male faculty disproportionately reporting an overly intense work environment.
The Council on Family and Work recommended that the Provost appoint an Ad Hoc committee to delve further into the issues surround faculty pace and pressure and to recommend changes in MIT faculty policies and initiatives that will provide the best possible environment for sustainable faculty achievement and the best, sustainable academic community for our faculty, staff and students. Simultaneously, MIT has fostered a community of scholars where achievement and entrepreneurship flourishes at every level of the academic endeavor. These foundations of our culture have been highly valued and have been carefully fostered.
Charge to Committee
The Committee should undertake serious deliberations of the findings, suggestions and recommendations from the report of the Quality of Life Survey by the MIT Council on Family and Work. Specifically, the Committee should establish the magnitude of the perceived increased work load on the faculty and the institutional consequences of it . The committee should:
Using this understanding as a foundation, the committee make recommendations that would improve the quality of life for the faculty. These recommendations may include:
I realize the large effort entailed in a deliberation of the issues which are integrated into the issue of faculty quality of life. In many ways the root causes and potential changes required are embedded into the fabric of MIT's culture. Even so, this fabric needs to be reexamined in light of the issues that face our faculty, both at home and at MIT. Institutional change is complex, especially of the type that may be required to fully address the issues surrounding a sustainable pace and pressure for our faculty. The deliberations of this committee will be the focal point for this debate and the findings will be critical to MIT faculty for decades to come.