Greg Fischer's Personal Web Site

Academics

Welcome to nerd paradise!
How could you not love it here?

 

 

 

 

Link to my MIT home page here.

Here's a summary of my active research (Click here for MIT page that is updated more frequently)

“Contract Structure, Risk Sharing and Investment Choice," Job Market Paper [pdf]
Abstract:
Few microfinance-funded businesses grow beyond subsistence entrepreneurship. Most remain at a very small scale, with little capital and no employees. This paper considers one possible explanation: the structure of existing microfinance contracts may discourage risky but high-expected return investments. To explore this possibility, I develop a theory that unifies models of investment choice, informal insurance with limited commitment, and formal financial contracts. I then test the predictions of this theory with clients of a large microfinance institution in India using a series of experiments that allowed precise variation of both financial contracts and information. The experiments confirm the theoretical predictions that joint liability creates two inefficiencies. First, in the absence of effective mechanisms for peer monitoring, borrowers free-ride on their partners, making risky investments without compensating partners for this risk. Second, the addition of peer monitoring through project approval overcompensates, leading to sharp reductions in risk-taking and profitability. The theoretical prediction that group lending will crowd out informal insurance is not borne out by experimental evidence. While observed levels of informal insurance fall well short of the constrained Pareto frontier under both individual and joint liability, joint liability increases observed insurance transfers. Equity-like financing, in which partners share both the benefits and risks of more profitable projects, overcomes both of these inefficiencies and merits further testing in the field.


“Efficiency and Rent Seeking in Local Government,” with Esther Duflo and Raghabendra Chattopadhyay
Abstract
: The decentralized provision of local public goods involves a tradeoff between the local government’s ability to elicit and serve the preferences of the citizens (efficiency) and the risk of elite capture (rent seeking). This paper proposes and implements a test of local government efficiency by using a policy in India that set aside leadership positions in local governments to members of disadvantaged minority groups. The set-asides, or “reservations,” are randomly assigned to villages, allowing unbiased estimates of their effects on the quantity and the types of public goods provided. If local governments are efficient, even if they discriminate against minority groups by supplying fewer public goods, they should still supply the public goods that minority groups value most. With homothetic preferences, when reservations increase the bargaining power of minorities, expenditures across all types of public goods should increase proportionately. We find that when leadership positions are reserved for disadvantaged minorities, hamlets in which these minorities live receive a greater allocation of public goods. Moreover, we can reject that this increase in public goods in minority hamlets is proportional to the distribution of goods when the leadership position is unreserved, suggesting local governments are not efficient.


“Financial Literacy & Firm Growth,” with Antoinette Schoar and Alejandro Drexler, Work in Progress
Abstract:
A growing number of policymakers and microfinance institutions are providing basic business skills training to micro-entrepreneurs in order to encourage growth beyond the subsistence level. Yet the broad-based nature of most training programs makes it difficult to evaluate the mechanisms though which they operate. We conduct a randomized evaluation of a training program for micro-entrepreneurs in the Dominican Republic that allows us to identify the effects of cash management, investment planning, and accounting skills. By varying the treatment intensity, we can distinguish between the effects of receiving training, learning the material, and actually implementing the trained skills. This “proof of concept” approach will allow better targeting of human capital development programs.


“Commitment, Paternalism, and Mental Accounting: The Effects of Programmed Savings and Remittance Products on Recipients and Senders,” with Antoinette Schoar, Work in Progress
Abstract:
Remittances have become an important source of income for poor families in developing countries. Working with a large microfinance institution in the Dominican Republic, we designed a range of remittance-linked financial products: commitment savings accounts that restrict access to funds until certain savings targets are met; and programmed accounts that restrict the use of funds to certain items such as education, housing, or business investment. Using a randomized encouragement design, we can identify the welfare implications of remittances on recipients and test the hypothesis that recipients treat remittances differently than other sources of income while still providing all clients access to the remittance products. We test the effect of these accounts on the spending and investment behavior of recipients, distinguishing between the effects of commitment and mental accounting. We also evaluate the role of downstream commitment products on the remittance behavior of senders.

My Miscellaneous Econometrics Notes

  1. Clustering DRAFT
  2. Some interesting things from 385 DRAFT
  3. Introduction to Matlab, Part 1

Development General

  1. Reading Notes (pdf 0.5M) (doc 0.8M)

Handouts from 14.382 (Spring 2004). Note these will be supplemented with typeset versions as available

  1. Matrix Algebra (0.5M)
  2. Distribution Theory (0.2M)
  3. Newey's Distribution Theory Handout (0.5M)
  4. Statistical Inference (0.5M)
  5. OLS Small Sample (0.4M)
  6. Additional Information on R-Squared (1.1M)
  7. TTesting in an OLS world (0.4M)
  8. OLS Large Sample (0.3M)
  9. Non-spherical disturbance and GLS (1.0M)
  10. Non-orthogonality and IV (1.0M)
  11. Non-linear, a basic introduction focusing on discrete choice models (0.7M)
  12. Panel Data (0.5M)

Handouts from 14.383 (Fall 2004). Note these will be supplemented with typeset versions as available

  1. Math Review and Simultaneous Equation Basics (0.4M)
  2. OLS on Structural and Reduced Form; Identification (0.4M)
  3. Limited and Full Information; Testing (0.5M)
  4. SUR and 3SLS (0.3M)
  5. FIML (0.3M)
  6. FIML Part 2 (O.2M)
  7. Testing; GMM; NLIV (0.2M)
  8. Finite Sample 2SLS (0.3M)
  9. Newey's GMM Handout (0.1M)
  10. Review (0.3M)

Economic History

  1. "Summary of All Knowledge" (pdf 0.2M) (doc 0.3M)

Printing from your personal machine to an Athena Printer

All the fun of printing from the lab, none of the pesky print quotas.
(1) Install kerberos for windows and klp utilities (order matters) http://web.mit.edu/software/win.html.
(2) Add printer following these instructions for Windows XP or for Windows 2000. Note that even though Picus and Lotis are not HP 8150 Series PS printers, you should set them up as such.
(3) Go ahead and run a test page. It won't work, but you'll feel better trying.
(4) When you actually print, you'll be asked for your kerberos id and password (this is your Athena password).
(5) Don't worry about the error messages that you'll receive. Think of them as scarecrows. Be the bigger bird.
(6) You should also be able to activate double-sided printing (but there seem to some problems with this that tech support is still working on)

| ©2004 Ichthyolithics