In this fresh, literate, and biting critique of current thinking on some of today's most important and controversial topics, leading anthropologists take on some of America's top pundits.

This absorbing collection of essays subjects such popular commentators as Thomas Friedman, Samuel Huntington, Robert Kaplan, and Dinesh D'Souza to cold, hard scrutiny and finds that their writing is often misleadingly simplistic, culturally ill-informed, and politically dangerous. Mixing critical reflection with insights from their own fieldwork, twelve distinguished anthropologists respond by offering fresh perspectives on globalization, ethnic violence, social justice, and the biological roots of behavior. They take on such topics as the collapse of Yugoslavia, the consumer practices of the American poor, American foreign policy in the Balkans, and contemporary debates over race, welfare, and violence against women. In the clear, vigorous prose of the pundits themselves, these contributors reveal the hollowness of what often passes as prevailing wisdom and passionately demonstrate the need for a humanistically complex and democratic understanding of the contemporary world.

More about Why America's Top Pundits Are Wrong

Table of Contents and Introduction.

Editors and Contributors.

Critical commentary and reviews of Why America's Top Pundits are Wrong.

Resources for Teaching with Why America's Top Pundits are Wrong

Discussion Forums

Nominate a pundit for critique

General discussion of America's Top Pundits

• Samuel Huntington
• Thomas Friedman
• Dinesh D'Souza
• Robert D. Kaplan
• Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray
• Randy Thornhill and Craig Palmer