 |
      |
|
|
|
 |
Joshua Moskowitz Chemical
Engineering Grad Student
B.S. in
Materials Science and
Engineering, Cornell University '07
Hometown: Nashua, NH |
Controlled Release of Gentamicin
from Polyelectrolyte Multilayers to Treat Implant-Related Infection
Most implanted devices are associated with
orthopedics as over 800,000 joint replacements are performed in North
America each year—reflecting a 200% increase between 1999 and 2002 alone
[1, 2]. Primary joint replacements (also known as arthroplasties) are
typically performed on patients with arthritis or major injury to
alleviate pain and restore motion to the joint. These operations add up
to an annual expenditure of $1.4 billion in the United States for total
hip arthroplasty and $2.59 billion for total knees with 2/3 of these
costs being offset by Medicare [3]. As expected, the number of revision
surgeries is also on the rise at 17.5% for hips and 8.2% for knees [1].
Since revision surgeries require extended use of hospital resources and
surgeon time, subtracting 1% from each of these values would have saved
$112.6 million and $100 million for hips and knees respectively [1, 4].
In order to promote implant success, there has been
rising interest in the design and implementation of combination devices.
According to the United States Food and Drug Administration, a
combination device is an apparatus that includes two or more regulated
components (i.e. drugs, devices, or biologics) that are combined and
produced as a single entity [5]. Drug-device combination products have
garnered increasing attention from both pharmaceutical and medical
device companies as a general strategy to address persisting
complications in clinical practice. Coordinated design of such devices
has the potential to greatly improve both device performance as well as
the associated quality of life for the recipient. Since efficacy of a
drug-device combination is generally not a linear combination of adding
existing technologies together, these products can offer synergistic
advantages over the case of administering both the drug and device
separately in their conventional forms.
This thesis focuses on the incorporation of the
small, hydrophilic antibiotic gentamicin into polyelectrolyted
multilayered (PEM) surface coatings for tunable, local, and sustained
delivery from implants based on Layer-by-Layer (LbL) assembly. These
robust films are specifically designed to treat an existing
implant-related infection. The critical advantage that places LbL on the
cutting edge of existing technologies is its potential to release
multiple therapeutics, simultaneously or sequentially, and thus allow
for smart design of local therapeutic delivery from drug-device
combinations for optimized treatment. For the stated case of orthopedic
implants, the pertinent set of complications that could be addressed are
pain, inflammation, infection, and long term loosening of the implant.
The work presented in this thesis was conducted under a financial
support parcel whose overarching aim was to develop a thin film solution
to address this precise set of complications. Nevertheless, the end goal
of a multi-therapeutic product necessitates design and optimization of
individual therapeutic systems and this thesis specifically addresses
the antibiotic delivery component for the treatment of infection.
Polyelectrolyte multilayered (PEM) coatings were
fabricated to incorporate and release the small, hydrophilic antibiotic
gentamicin from implant surfaces for infection control. The use of a
cationic hydrolytically cleavable poly(β-amino ester) rendered these
films biodegradable and thus yielded both diffusion-based and
surface-erosion based release of this therapeutic. The Layer-by-Layer (LbL)
assembly platform was used to create conformal, micron scale reservoirs
for controlled release. Film release profiles were tuned through film
architecture design and post-processing crosslinking techniques. Release
of gentamicin was sustained for weeks, which is a significant
improvement from previous gentamicin-releasing LbL systems. To gain
better insight on the mechanisms of release, a theoretical treatment of
the physical system was performed and yielded both an analytical
mathematical model that describes the release of drug per area of film
as a function of time as well as a computational model that simulates
the time-dependent concentration profiles in these systems, thus laying
a foundation for rational film design.
These erodible, antibiotic coatings were demonstrated
to be bactericidal against Staphylococcus aureus, an infectious
microorganism that is highly relevant to implant-related infections, and
film degradation products were generally nontoxic towards MC3T3-E1
osteoprogenitor cells. A reproducible in vivo rabbit bone infection
model was developed to test the PEM coatings against sterile, uncoated
placebos; subsequent in vivo experimental efforts demonstrated the
proof-of-principle that an antibiotic-eluting LbL film can efficaciously
treat a pre-existing implant-related infection.
One further application was studied which combined
the release-based efficacy of these erodible films with a permanent,
contact-killing LbL film. This combination work yielded the treatment
benefit of an initial burst release, while preventing both biofilm
formation and reducing the possibility of development of antibiotic
resistance that could have formed due to the presence of
prolonged, sublethal concentrations of gentamicin.

Titanium rods coated with [Poly 1/PAA/GS/PAA]200
ž [Poly 1/PAA/GS]1 produced a baseline zone of inhibition of 25.6 mm
(measured perpendicular to the long axis of the rod) against S. aureus
after overnight incubation at 37oC. As a control, the sample is
referenced to a commercially available BD Sensi-Disc. The lighter color
at the rod surface is a result of the ruptured agar and not the presence
of bacteria. The scale bar is in centimeters [6].
1. Kurtz S,
Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M. Prevalence of primary and
revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990
through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87(7):1487-1497.
2. Moss AJ,
Hamburger S, Moore RM, Jr., Jeng LL, Howie LJ. Use of selected medical
device implants in the United States, 1988. Adv Data 1991;
26(191):1-24.
3. Parvizi J,
Antoci V, Hickok NJ, Shapiro IM. Selfprotective smart orthopedic
implants. Expert Review of Medical Devices 2007; 4(1):55-64.
4. Ong KL,
Mowat FS, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern MT, Kurtz SM. Economic burden of
revision hip and knee arthroplasty in Medicare enrollees. Clin Orthop
Relat Res 2006; 446:22-28.
5. Wu P, Grainger DW.
Drug/device combinations for local drug therapies and infection
prophylaxis. Biomaterials 2006; 27(11):2450-2467.
6. Moskowitz JS, Blaisse MR,
Samuel RE, Hsu H.-P., Harris MB, Martin SD, Lee JC, Spector M, Hammond
PT, The effectiveness of the controlled release of gentamicin from
polyelectrolyte multilayers in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus
infection in a rabbit bone model. Biomaterials 2010;
31(23):6019-6030.
|
 |