MIT: Independent Activities Period: IAP

IAP 2017 Activities by Sponsor - Alan Natapoff



Why the Electoral College, which has succeeded so well, including in 1888 and 2000, failed in 2016.

Alan Natapoff, Research Scientist

Jan/18 Wed 04:00PM-05:30PM 37-252

Enrollment: Limited: First come, first served (no advance sign-up)
Prereq: none

A democratic voting system must deliver unanimous consent, of both majority and minority, to its outcome. It achieves it by assuring each voter large fair voting power.  Simple majority voting (SMV) can deliver that large power in a small, but not in any large realistic election.  The Constitutional majority-of-majorities (MoM) Electoral College system has succeeded for 180 years at large scale, despite its imperfections.  In 1888 and 2000 it elected the candidate with fewer popular votes which was, as baseball's season-scoring system is, consistent with its large goal.  It did the same in 2016, but without achieving unanimous consent.  The cure is to give all voters more power (especially in poorly-contested states) than they have now.   This can be done by drawing districts that are smaller and better-contested than states, and giving them national weight equal to the total number of votes actually cast in them.  We  survey, briefly, the debate over presidential voting systems and the mathematics of voting power.

Contact: Alan Natapoff, 37-147, 617 253-7757, NATAPOFF@MIT.EDU