| |
1. Deficient |
2. Fair |
3. Good |
4. Excellent |
| Organization of Presentation |
-- Disorganized, appears unpracticed
-- Does not utilize graphic elements
-- Material is uneven and confusing: little use of technical terms
-- Unable to answer relevant questions
-- Only one presenter (if team)
on
|
- Organized presentation, but relies heavily on notes
- Inefective use of graphics
- Key part of the study not presented
- Unprepared for most questions
- redundant information presented by team members
on
|
+ Clear, well organized presentation
+ Effective use of graphics
+ Key part of study presented; proper use of techincal terms,
defined when appropriate
+ Prepared for all questions
+ Each team members shares responsability of presentation
on
|
++ Higly organized, well practiced and endgaging presentation
++ Poster/overheads are well designed and integral to presentation
++ Key study parts emphasized; technical terms defined and explained
++ Team members entertain questions and give thoughtful responses
++ team menbers transition flawlessly and show master of materials, enthusiasm and correctness
on
|
| Use of Technology |
-- No attempt to use technology appropriate to topic (e.g. PowerPoint, overheads, etc)
-- No references to relevant website, simulations, etc
on
|
- Some use of technology appropriate to the topic (PowerPoint, overheads, etc)
- Few references to relevant websites, videos, simulations, etc
- Fumbles with technology; not practiced
on
|
+ Demonstrates some competence and ease in using technology to illustrate points or present examples (e.g. PowerPoint, overheads, etc)
+ Provides some refrences to relevant websites and videos
on
|
++ Manages technology competently, appropriately, and effectively to illustrate points, provide simulations, animation, demonstrations, and/or vignettes to aid in understanding
++Provides a
variety of ADDITIONAL REFERENCES to relevant websites, videos,
simulations, and live video streaming sites to aid student interest and
understanding of the topic
on
|
| Aesthetics |
-- Contains many errors; Lack of proofreading evident
-- Visual elements too similar
-- Lack of appropriate graphics
-- Oversized, flimsy formats used
on
|
- Edited with some errors in grammar and spelling
- Inconsistent layout; materials appear to have been rushed or thrown together
- Confusing graphics
- Lacks discretion in inclusion of elements
on
|
+ Well edited, clear and easy to read
+ Use of graphics (tables, graphs, drawing) where appropriate
+ Consistent layout
+ Adequate text for independent display
+ Good use of color, attractive
on
|
++ Visual and supplementary materials are provided that heighten understanding of material
++ Incorporates graphics that are relevant and effective
++ Excellent balance between text and graphics
++ Use of creative, novel, or personal touches that aid understanding
++ Makes good use of color and space
on
|
| Use of Sources |
-- Lacks appropriate references
-- Lacks evidence of a relevant literature review
-- No reference resources list provided for students
on
|
- Unable to place theories within context of existing literature
- Incomplete review of relevant literature
- References provided only from required reading
on
|
+ Frequent, reliable citations to support theories, procedures, and conclusions
+ Incorporation of required readings where appropriate
+ Use of some outside sources including articles, books and Internet sites, and courses
on
|
++ Evidence of an informed, thorough and relevant literature review
++ Integrates resources from other related sources and courses
++ Uses a variety of appropriate sources, articles, books, Internet sites, etc
on
|