Skip to content Accesskey=4Skip to sub-navigation Accesskey=3View our Accessibility Options MIT Information Services and Technology Home About IS&T Contact IS&T Site Map Search Advanced Search
Getting StartedGetting Services by Topic or Alphabetically Getting Help

On This Page

Practice Definition

Highly Recommended Practices

Other Recommended Practices

Related Links

Guide for Creating Teams

 


Guide for Creating Teams:

Meeting Practices of Successful Teams

Note: IS&T uses the terms Project Team and Standing Team to differentiate between temporary teams tackling a one time effort (Project) versus a Standing Team which provides an ongoing service.

Practice Definition

Successful teams (these that get through the development stages in a positive way) have a set of agreed to meeting practices.

Practice definition: An actionable, observable, and repeatable activity agreed to by the team; is meant to become a routine way of doing business.

Practices become the way to make 'Working as a Team' the way the group does business.

Based on the experiences across many IS&T teams, as well as external research, the following practices are highly recommended for all IS&T teams.


Highly Recommended Practices

Establish Agendas in Advance of Meeting

  • Establish start and end times for meetings
  • Estimated time for each agenda item
  • Assess meeting flow to ensure sufficient time

Set Roles to Support the Task Work

  • Team Leader can focus on content
  • Facilitator may serve as discussion leader using process tools and techniques to help the group accomplish their work
  • Scribe acts as a recorder who writes what is being said on a wallboard or surface to help the group stay focused
  • Note taker captures action items

Develop Ground Rules at Outset

  • Make explicit what behaviors are needed to be effective
  • Address the need for active listening, respecting other people's ideas, how decisions will be made, how work will be shared, ways the group will deal with conflict and other such areas

Use Process Techniques and Tools

  • Structure agenda items so you select the right tools for the tasks
  • The least efficient process technique is throwing the topic open for discussion.

Capturing Action Items -- WHAT/WHO/WHEN

  • Agreeing on what will be done by whom is a simple but very helpful practice -- leaving out who or the due date means the action may not be followed through on and thus may undermine the good work leading up to the action phase. Getting the action items out within 24 hours keeps the process on track
  • Checking back and holding people accountable will move everything forward. (See Action Register Example)

Use a Visible Means to Display and Track What's Being Said

  • Writing on a board or chart in front of people helps groups stay focused
  • This also helps the group build on the prior points
  • This makes it easier for a facilitator or group member to prompt the group to converge or summarize

Planning and Delegating Make a Huge Difference

  • The better the preparation for the meeting, the more likely you can maximize the time spent at the session. For example sending out any background material prior to the meeting encourages people to do their homework. If you clarify what you want to accomplish when reading the material or when taking up agenda items, this will help people focus better.
  • Recognizing what needs to be done by the full team and what can be done by an individual or a subset of the team will be more efficient and make better use of the group's time. This practice also tends to expedite the group's work so there is greater progress.

[Back to top]


Other Recommended Practices

Use Process Checks or Parking Lots to Keep People on the Subject

  • Group members will inevitably digress from the issue at hand. Ask for a "Process Check -- are we still on the issue?
  • Sometimes people bring up related issues that need to be discussed, yet if this conversation continues, the initial topic is lost. Suggest placing the issue in the "parking lot" which makes it a future agenda item.

Meeting Critiques
Groups that improve make it a practice to conduct self-assessments ("plus-deltas"). Spending five minutes at the end of the meeting will allow the group to comment on what helped the meeting and what hindered the meeting. This allows the group to use real time feedback as a way to catch things that didn't work well while enhancing the group's effectiveness.

[Back to top]

 

MIT Home | Getting Started | Getting Services | Getting Help | About IS&T | Accessibility
Ask a technology question or send a comment about this web page.