Authentic Personal message at 01:52:14 on Fri Jan 11 2002
From: Well, you have two choices, and one of them is wrong. <shadow@ANDREW.CMU.EDU> on SCULLY.TRAFFORD.DEMENTIA.ORG
To: kolya@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
lost, but this time we see:
01:48:58.589965 128.2.100.230.7001 > 128.2.10.26.7000: [udp sum ok]  rx data cid f0eb9b58 call# 2857 seq 1 ser 3095 <client-init>,<last-pckt> fs call fetch-status fid 1970877065/10966/43140 (44) (DF) (ttl 64, id 0, len 72)
01:48:58.683388 128.2.10.26.7000 > 128.2.100.230.7001: [udp sum ok]  rx data cid f0eb9b58 call# 2857 seq 1 ser 3110 <last-pckt> fs reply fetch-status (148) (DF) [tos 0x68]  (ttl 251, id 30900, len 176)
01:48:58.683716 128.2.100.230.7001 > 128.2.10.26.7000: [udp sum ok]  rx data cid f0eb9b58 call# 2858 seq 1 ser 3096 <client-init>,<last-pckt> fs call fetch-status fid 1970877065/10968/43141 (44) (DF) (ttl 64, id 0, len 72)
01:48:59.025397 128.2.10.26.7000 > 128.2.100.230.7001: [udp sum ok]  rx data cid f0eb9b58 call# 2858 seq 1 ser 3111 <last-pckt> fs reply fetch-status (148) (DF) [tos 0x68]  (ttl 251, id 30901, len 176)
01:48:59.025774 128.2.100.230.7001 > 128.2.10.26.7000: [udp sum ok]  rx data cid f0eb9b58 call# 2859 seq 1 ser 3097 <client-init>,<last-pckt> fs call fetch-status fid 1970877065/18582/48102 (44) (DF) (ttl 64, id 0, len 72)
01:48:59.906945 128.2.10.26.7000 > 128.2.100.230.7001: [udp sum ok]  rx data cid f0eb9b58 call# 2858 seq 1 ser 3112 <req-ack>,<last-pckt> fs reply fetch-status (148) (DF) [tos 0x68]  (ttl 251, id 30902, len 176)
interestingly we then get serials 3113-3118 from the server also for call 2858