On the origin of Creoles:
A Cartesian critique of Neo-Darwinian linguistics
Linguistic Typology 2001, vol. 5, nos. 2/3, pp. 213--310
Michel DeGraff
degraff@MIT.EDU
Table of contents
- 1. Neo-Darwinian Creolistics:
Whence and whereto? A sketch --- p.213
- 1.1 Historiography and Epistemology:
From Schleicher to Popper --- p.214
- 1.1.1 (Pre-)Darwinian linguistics:
Schleicher (1863) on the `Tree of Language' --- p.214
- 1.1.2 Neo-Darwinian creolistics:
Saint-Quentin (1872) and Adam
(1883) on simple(st) languages --- p.215
- 1.1.3 On Cartesian-Uniformitarian linguistics:
The Neogrammarians --- p.216
- 1.1.4 Foucault (1972)
on "chimera and reverie" in linguistics --- p.217
- 1.1.5 Popper (1965)
on (criticisms of) myths as science --- p.217
- 1.2 Schleicherian roots of Language and route to progress:
From
isolating to agglutinative to inflectional/fusional --- p.217
- 1.3 A foundational myth:
Creoles as contemporary Ursprachen --- p.220
- 1.4 Toward Cartesian-Uniformitarian creolistics --- p.220
- 1.5 Back to
Schleicher(ian creolistics)'s Ursprachen --- p.223
- 1.6 Toward Cartesian creolistics (redux):
A guide for
"learning by debunking" --- p.224
- 2. Defining "Creole" --- p.227
- 2.1 Haitian Creole:
An anti-prototype Prototypical Creole --- p.228
- 2.2 The Creole Prototype is
an anti-Saussurean artificial language --- p.232
- 2.3 Empirical and methodological considerations --- p.234
- 3. Creoles, how "old" are you? --- p.234
- 3.1 Creoles as "born again" languages? --- p.234
- 3.2 Why/How do we "age" languages? --- p.235
- 3.3 Creoles as
multi-millenarian morphosyntactically-wrinkled
neonates --- p.238
- 4. On "pidgins", "simplification" and "basic communication" --- p.242
- 4.1 Epistemological issues:
Vagueness, circularity,
falsifiability, etc. --- p.242
- 4.2 On the making of "pidgins" --- p.244
- 4.3 Are pidgins designed ab ovo
from "ground zero" complexity? --- p.250
- 4.4 "Simplification":
Terminus a quo and terminus ad quem --- p.256
- 4.5 "Basic communication":
What are the basics? --- p.259
- 5. A most simplistic "complexity" metric --- p.265
- 5.1 Defining complexity via description length
(= number of information bits) --- p.265
- 5.2 Not all "bits" of grammar have theoretical bite --- p.266
- 5.3 How many "rules"?
The looks of languages vs. the essence of grammar --- p.268
- 5.4 Complexity is no simple matter --- p.273
- 6. "Learning by Debunking":
The empirical (non-)basis of age-complexity correlations --- p.274
- 6.1 Age before complexity? Complexity before age?
Schleicherian circularity --- p.274
- 6.2 Cycles of complexity in diachrony --- p.278
- 6.3 Historical linguists' "endless cycles"
vs. pro-prototype
creolists' "ground zero" --- p.280
- 6.4 The empirical test:
To be "old" and "born again"? --- p.281
- 7. Envoi: The descent of the Creole speaker --- p.289
- Appendix I:
Were Haitian affixes "borrowed late"? --- p.291
- Appendix II:
On the "afrogenesis" of Haitian (and
Mauritian) Creole --- p.294
- Correspondence address --- p.300
- Acknowledgements --- p.300
- Abbreviations --- p.300
-
References --- p.300
degraff@MIT.EDU