An International Conference
October 8-10, 1999
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
The Metaphors We Live By
Moderator: Hugh Gusterson
Global
Brain, Global Metropolis, and Role of Communications Technologies in the
Evolution of Social Networks
Alexander
Campbell Halavais, University of Washington
While the dominant metaphors
for computer networking seem to be dying out, both physiological and urban
metaphors retain a small but growing following. These metaphors are in
no way unique to the most recent "new media." They are appealing because
of their capacity to describe and perhaps model the increasingly complex
patterns associated with communications networks in a parsimonious way. |
The
Mythography of the "New Frontier"
Virginia Eubanks, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
The Mythography of the 'New
Frontier' explores the political and social consequences of conceptualizing
cyberspace as a frontier--a metaphorization than implies a very particular
set of symbols and icons centering on notions of conquest, flexibility,
individualism, democracy, and profit. My goal in this paper is to make
the hidden assumptions of this metaphor apparent by unearthing both historical
and present-day conditions of our mythic and geographic frontiers. |
What
is Information?
The Flow of Bits
and the Control of Chaos
David Sholle, Miami University
[The complete text of David Sholle's paper is available.]
The argument of this paper
is that both academic and political/economic discourses on the information
society are tied to the instrumental projects of developing a technological
infrastructure and instituting economic practices for controlling the exchange
of informational products. As such, they operate with a conception of information
that brackets its meaning, while allowing "information as meaning" to remain
as an unspoken background that seeps into its discourse. An analysis of
information science and economics will show that "information" is defined
as nonsemantic discrete bits flowing across space and then directed and
stored. This substantiates information as the object of control. |
|