An International Conference
October 8-10, 1999
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
The Public Sphere
Moderator: Stephen Ansolabehere
New
Media and the Prospect for Democratic Communication
Jon
Bekken, Suffolk University
Mass media were once viewed
as dialogic, as open for engaging readers and political leaders in a common
discussion, in sharp contrast to the "refeudalization of the public sphere"
Habermas has written of, in which politics becomes a spectacle wholly outside
the daily lives of citizens who have little possibility of entering into
or shaping that discourse.
While such an outcome is
far from certain, new media forms have the potential to facilitate democratic
communications. The obstacles to expanding upon these models are not technological,
rather they are political and economic. If we are to reinvigorate the public
sphere, we must ultimately revive the intermediate publics through which
people were once brought into political discourse and action. |
Unaided
Virtues: The (Neo-)Liberalization
of the Domestic Sphere
James
Hay, University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana
This paper is interested
in how "media" operated as technologies instrumental to the emergence of
"neo-liberal" modes of governing in the U.S. during the 1980s. The paper
is particularly concerned with how the convergence of media and other technologies
during the 1980s contributed to the formation of a new social arrangement
that depended upon a particular model of domesticity. My focus on the domestic
sphere as a space of "self-governing" is, in part, intended to amplify
the spatial problematic that is central to Foucaultian critiques of neo-liberalism,
i.e., how the domestic sphere was integral to a broader social arrangement
and for governing at a distance. The paper also considers how media, in
their relation to other household technologies (particularly "programmable
appliances"), came to support and to rely upon a particular model of the
domestic sphere during the 1980s--one that I refer to as a "(neo-) liberalized"
domestic sphere. Although this is a model that had been taking shape for
some time, it became crucial to neo-liberal forms of governing over the
80s. Its endurance and strengthening over the 90s affirms that neo-liberalism
has less to do with political philosophy than with the emergence of new
social spheres and new techniques of managing them in the last part of
the twentieth century. |
Communication
Theory in Transition:
Parameters of the
New Global Public Sphere
Ingrid
Volkmer, University of Augsburg, Germany
Globalization is creating
a new kind of 'public sphere' which challenges traditional definitions
and conceptions. This paper will map the parameters of this emerging worldwide
political community and the new (satellite- and cyber-) media environments
that enable it. |
|