>>> Item number 26238 from WRITERS LOG9402C --- (45 records) ----- <<< Date: Tue, 22 Feb 1994 10:24:41 JST Reply-To: WRITERS Sender: WRITERS From: Mike Barker Subject: TECH: Another Slice at Art (Since I'm getting newt's responses to Roger's crits that I don't see until later and other strange anachronisms in the flow from writers, I assume there may be some comments on my "definition" out there... but I'm going to add this comment on my own before I get your comments, just for anachronistic completeness...) Empathy tends to be valued for being the ability or faculty of "bypassing" the normal communication channels and "reading" the other person - to some extent despite what they may be saying. The person who listens to someone order coffee and says, "I see you're upset. Trouble with your S.O.?" and proceeds to ask, comment, and in time help with the hidden fears and problems that others never notice - that's the person with empathy. I see art as the complement to this. Instead of "reading" the other person, the artist is the one who "writes" (or draws, composes, etc.) onto our lives. The words, the techniques, are the same ones that other people use, but somehow there is more there than the basics. This is the person who in doing their art illuminates parts of our lives that we may never even have seen before. So, I suppose, I see art as something that comes from the heart and speaks directly to other lives - whether the words are clear and smooth or rough and chosen ill, the artist makes them do more work than one would think possible. Admittedly, I think the artist can improve their work by study and careful use of the technique - but in some ways that isn't really important for them. (did everyone disappear on a break or something? hiding behind the couch again? you just got back from Christmas/New Year's - how can you have another break so fast? that's okay - you leave the list open, and I'll have fun shadowboxing with myself for a while... just don't turn out the lights on your way out, please?) I sure am glad I don't have an aesthetic theory to protect - while I like what I'm saying, and believe it, I think it would be an absolute horror to pin down in a philosophical rigorous way... tink