The city of Boston was founded in 1630 on a peninsula which jutted out
into a harbor. The shape of the land and its proximity to water made
the region seem defendable and therefore an ideal location for settlement.
The original contour and topography of Boston, however, was the direct
result of seismic activity millions of years ago and glacial movements
thousands of years ago. The major earthquakes that shook the area
in prehistoric times created a basin which was eventually flooded by the
nearby Atlantic Ocean, forming bays.
1 By the seventeenth
century, the Kenmore Square region of Boston was still under water at the
intersection of the Muddy and Charles Rivers, as shown in the map from 1777
above.
2 Sandwiched between salt meadows on the northwest
and southeast, Kenmore Square was not actually filled until the end of the
nineteenth century. Throughout its history, the growth of the site
has been continually linked to ongoing natural and environmental processes
coupled with the alteration of the land by human beings. Kenmore Square
has most notably been influenced by distinctive patterns of sunlight and
pollution. Although the locations of maximum and minimum light
and the diversity of pollutants that permeate the site have changed considerably
in the last 150 years, they continue to trigger the development of microclimates
and to directly control the propagation of plant and animal populations.
In Boston,
the early nineteenth century was characterized by a significant population
expansion. This increase strained the natural resources of the
city and the public began looking for new water sources and new ways to
get power for mills. In 1821, the Mill Dam was built, enclosing the
section of the Charles River that is now the Back Bay and setting the seeds
for the development of Kenmore Square which began approximately seventy
years later. The pool of stagnant water between the dam and
the river was the first form of pollution that influenced the development
of Kenmore Square. The extent of this contamination is evident in
the following quotation from Anne Whiston Spirn’s
The Granite Garden
:
The water contamination predicted by the Mill Dam’s opponents
was rapidly realized. Both the Muddy River and the Stony Brook emptied
into the Back Bay Basin; so did all the sewers of Roxbury. Tidal
action was impeded not only by the dam, but also by the two railroad causeways
that crisscrossed it.3
In 1849, the Boston Health Department ordered that the region which is
now the Back Bay and the southeastern corner of Kenmore Square be filled
in. By the 1880s, the prominent landscape architect Frederick Law
Olmsted “proposed a plan for the remainder of the Back Bay that addressed
both sanitation and flooding [whose] central feature was a park called the
Fens”
4 which borders what is now Kenmore Square.
The two railroads continued to pass through the site transporting passengers
into and out of Boston. Kenmore Square remained a transportation hub
even after the railroads declined in the early twentieth century and Beacon
Street and Commonwealth Avenue both became major thoroughfares for automobiles.
Figure 2: Aerial Photograph of
Kenmore Square with Shadows and Street Names 5
Light is
among the most significant driving forces behind the natural and environmental
processes which shape Kenmore Square. The map above is an aerial
view of Kenmore Square.
5 Notice the teal areas along
the sidewalks of Commonwealth Avenue and the western portion of Bay State
Road. A similar shade of blue-green is seen west of the Citgo sign
on top of the Boston University Bookstore. From careful observation,
it is evident that these teal regions represent the shadows cast by the
buildings in Kenmore Square. Since the location of the sun in the
sky does not remain stationary, the pattern, position, and extent of the
shadows change slightly throughout the day and from season to season.
Nevertheless, the intensity of sunlight in this photograph is obviously
strong and there is no snow on the ground or on the buildings. As
a result, it can be inferred that the picture was taken during the summer
months of the year in the early afternoon. After visiting the site
during mid-March just before sunset, the locations of maximum shadows seemed
similar to those in the photograph. For example, the sidewalk along
the south side of Commonwealth Avenue was markedly darker than the sidewalk
on the north side of the street. Thus, it is likely that the slight
shifts in the shadow patterns on the site are negligible and that some sections
of Kenmore Square receive considerably less sunlight annually than others.
Pollution
has also impacted the development of Kenmore Square. When the first
buildings on the site were being constructed at the turn of the twentieth
century, two railroad lines passed through Kenmore Square. Most likely
powered by steam, these trains transported dirt and soot in addition to
passengers. The combustion of coal and wood in order to heat the
water to drive the engines also resulted in the production of an excess
of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide in the air. The same pollution
continued to contaminate Kenmore Square as the site was transformed from
a center of railroad transportation to a major intersection for automobile
traffic. According to Spirn,
Poisonous gasses hang in the air above the street and
toxic dust coats the roadway and sidewalk. Cars, buses, and trucks
congest the streets, accelerating and braking, emitting streams of carbon
monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and bits of lead and unburned fuel.6
Thus, the gasoline engines in the modern cars also emitted a great deal
of toxic exhaust, especially during periods of heavy traffic which is a
defining feature of Kenmore Square. The combination of these excess
gases with the dirt, soot, and remnants of fuel critically influenced the
variety of flora and fauna that would be able to survive and prosper on
the site.
The first
major effect of the distribution of sunlight and shadows coupled with
the pollution created by automobiles is the development of microclimates
within the confines of the site. It is obvious from walking through
Kenmore Square in March that there are some sections which are significantly
warmer than others. Observe the component of the park between both
sides of Commonwealth Avenue in the photo on the left below.
Figure 3: Photograph of the Remaining Snow in the Park
|
Figure 4: Photograph of the Remaining Snow
on the South Side of Commonwealth Avenue
|
Most of the surfaces appear dry and the only
snow that remains from the previous week’s storm is a three square foot
patch in the center. Examine the picture on the right. Snow
and ice are abundant and the outer edge of the sidewalk is still quite slippery.
Yet this sidewalk is located just a few yards across the street from the
dry park. Now compare the amount of light in both pictures, which were
taken at approximately the same time. It is clear that there is a
considerably different climate in two sections of the site that are relatively
close together. These differing microclimates are due to the fact
that the five story buildings along Commonwealth Avenue and Bay State Road
block some of the sunlight and cast shadows on the roadways creating sidewalks
that are cooler than those in the center of the Square. In addition,
the carbon dioxide gas expelled by the vehicles in the square is a “greenhouse
gas,” and the elevated level of such gases in the air due to automobiles
and buses is responsible for a part of the local increase in temperature
in Kenmore Square and Boston as a whole.
Moreover,
the varying intensity of light throughout the Square greatly affects the
ability for trees in certain locations to grow successfully. The
trees along the western part of Bay State Road outside of the boat shaped
Myles Standish Hall are much smaller and appear much less healthy than
those across the street near the brownstone residences. This can be
seen in the picture below.
Figure 5: Varying Tree Size Along Bay State Road
|
Figure 6: Tree on Bay State Road Breaking the Sidewalk
|
The photograph of the snow lined Commonwealth
Avenue above also indicates the same effect. The trees in this
shady portion of the square are obviously less developed. The trees
further down Bay State Road along both sides of the street seem to be
more uniform in size, with the roots of several of them breaking apart
the sidewalks. Even so, it is always possible that there are other
reasons why the trees in some portions of the square are larger and more
developed than others. For example, those outside of Myles Standish
Hall may actually be younger than the rest of the trees in the square.
It is possible that Boston University may cut down the trees when they
start to damage the sidewalks in order to prevent dangerous conditions
from developing which could lead to liability. Additionally, the
growth of the trees alongside Commonwealth Avenue may also be stunted
due to nutrient-drained, compacted soil underneath the nearby roadway which
is much more heavily trafficked than the residential Bay State Road.
Patterns
of light and shadows also significantly influence the form of the trees
in the square. The photograph on the left below shows a tree in the park
at the center of Commonwealth Avenue. The incline of the branches
on the left side of the tree is much sharper than the slope of the branches
on the right, and the majority of the volume of the tree seems to be to
the right of the trunk. The second graphic below shows another slender
tree on Beacon Street. It is actually growing on a slant with most
of its branches spanning over the street.
Figure 7: Tree in the Park at the Center of Commonwealth Avenue
|
Figure 8: Slender Tree on Beacon Street
|
This occurs because plants need light to
produce food through photosynthesis, and they are extremely proficient
at adapting to their environment in order to maximize the surface area
that is exposed to the sun. In direct sunlight, most plants mature
symmetrically. When there is a region near a tree with a greater amount
of light, the organism will experience a positive phototropism and will respond
to that stimulus by growing towards the light. This model of tree
growth is prevalent in Kenmore Square. As a result, along Beacon Street,
Commonwealth Avenue, and Bay State Road, the tree branches spread out over
the street and up towards the sun, pointing away from the individual buildings.
Finally,
the dense human population present in the site, in conjunction with the
pollution from automobiles and the location of shadows, has created an
urban ecosystem which is unfavorable to many of the animals that originally
inhabited the region. This change can be observed in the following
excerpt:
Pigeons, starlings, and house sparrows replace songbirds;
hosts of rats infest buildings and sewers. … Most of the wildlife
that does survive are not natives, but immigrants like rats, roaches,
and scavenging birds, who adapted long ago to a landscape dominated by
humans. 7
The photograph below shows a group of pigeons standing in the park at
the center of Kenmore Square.
Figure 9: Pigeons in the Park
They are rummaging for food particles left
by humans which symbolize the species’ innate ability to utilize human
garbage for survival. Often described as “rats with wings,”
8 pigeons are characteristic of the birds that continue
to live in the Square. The shady back alley behind Beacon Street
and Bay State Road is home to a series of dumpsters which has, in turn,
provided shelter and sustenance for an extremely successful rat population.
In conclusion,
since Boston’s founding in 1630, the environment of the Kenmore Square
site has been transformed from a subterranean section of the Charles River
between salt meadows into a typical urban neighborhood. Its development
has been closely linked to the growth of the city of Boston as a whole,
and the changes in the natural processes occurring on the site due to filling
during the nineteenth century and the influx of automobiles during the
twentieth century clearly resemble the environmental transformations taking
place in other parts of the city such as the adjacent Back Bay. Moreover,
Kenmore Square is a microcosm of the natural processes that are characteristic
of the urban environment in general. Light dictates the location
of successful and unsuccessful trees while greatly influencing the shape
and symmetry of plants in nearly every setting. Furthermore, the impact
of pollution on a city is a challenge that has continually faced urban
planners. Frederick Law Olmsted attempted to combat the pollution
and contamination in New York with Central Park and nearby Kenmore Square
with the “Emerald Necklace” of parks. Most importantly, Kenmore
Square truly exemplifies the relationship between humans and nature within
a city and the way in which plant and animal populations are capable of
adapting to an urban environment.
1 Anne Whiston Spirn, The Granite Garden
(Cambridge: Basic Books, 1984) 14.
2 Henry Pelham, “A Plan of Boston in New
England with its Environs, 1777.” Map. David Rumsey Map Collection.
6 Mar. 2003 <http://www.davidrumsey.com>.
3 Spirn 22.
4 Spirn 22.
5 “Mass GIS/MHD 2001 Color Ortho Imagery
Viewer.” Map. Massachusetts Geographic Information System.
18 Mar. 2003 < http://maps.massgis.state.ma.us/MassGISColorOrthos/viewer.htm>.
6 Spirn 56.
7 Spirn 207.
8 BBC News, “In Defence of Pigeons” 19 Jan.
2001, 20 Mar. 2003 <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1125708.stm>.
All photographs were taken by the author, Matthew Herman.