1777.jpg

Figure 1:  Location of Kenmore Square on a 1777 Map of Boston
2

            The city of Boston was founded in 1630 on a peninsula which jutted out into a harbor.  The shape of the land and its proximity to water made the region seem defendable and therefore an ideal location for settlement.  The original contour and topography of Boston, however, was the direct result of seismic activity millions of years ago and glacial movements thousands of years ago.  The major earthquakes that shook the area in prehistoric times created a basin which was eventually flooded by the nearby Atlantic Ocean, forming bays.1   By the seventeenth century, the Kenmore Square region of Boston was still under water at the intersection of the Muddy and Charles Rivers, as shown in the map from 1777 above. 2   Sandwiched between salt meadows on the northwest and southeast, Kenmore Square was not actually filled until the end of the nineteenth century.  Throughout its history, the growth of the site has been continually linked to ongoing natural and environmental processes coupled with the alteration of the land by human beings.  Kenmore Square has most notably been influenced by distinctive patterns of sunlight and pollution.  Although the locations of maximum and minimum light and the diversity of pollutants that permeate the site have changed considerably in the last 150 years, they continue to trigger the development of microclimates and to directly control the propagation of plant and animal populations.

            In Boston, the early nineteenth century was characterized by a significant population expansion.  This increase strained the natural resources of the city and the public began looking for new water sources and new ways to get power for mills.  In 1821, the Mill Dam was built, enclosing the section of the Charles River that is now the Back Bay and setting the seeds for the development of Kenmore Square which began approximately seventy years later.   The pool of stagnant water between the dam and the river was the first form of pollution that influenced the development of Kenmore Square.  The extent of this contamination is evident in the following quotation from Anne Whiston Spirn’s The Granite Garden :
The water contamination predicted by the Mill Dam’s opponents was rapidly realized.  Both the Muddy River and the Stony Brook emptied into the Back Bay Basin; so did all the sewers of Roxbury.  Tidal action was impeded not only by the dam, but also by the two railroad causeways that crisscrossed it.3
In 1849, the Boston Health Department ordered that the region which is now the Back Bay and the southeastern corner of Kenmore Square be filled in.  By the 1880s, the prominent landscape architect Frederick Law Olmsted “proposed a plan for the remainder of the Back Bay that addressed both sanitation and flooding [whose] central feature was a park called the Fens”4   which borders what is now Kenmore Square.  The two railroads continued to pass through the site transporting passengers into and out of Boston.  Kenmore Square remained a transportation hub even after the railroads declined in the early twentieth century and Beacon Street and Commonwealth Avenue both became major thoroughfares for automobiles.



Figure 2:  Aerial Photograph of Kenmore Square with Shadows and Street Names 5


            Light is among the most significant driving forces behind the natural and environmental processes which shape Kenmore Square.  The map above is an aerial view of Kenmore Square.5   Notice the teal areas along the sidewalks of Commonwealth Avenue and the western portion of Bay State Road.  A similar shade of blue-green is seen west of the Citgo sign on top of the Boston University Bookstore.  From careful observation, it is evident that these teal regions represent the shadows cast by the buildings in Kenmore Square.  Since the location of the sun in the sky does not remain stationary, the pattern, position, and extent of the shadows change slightly throughout the day and from season to season.  Nevertheless, the intensity of sunlight in this photograph is obviously strong and there is no snow on the ground or on the buildings.  As a result, it can be inferred that the picture was taken during the summer months of the year in the early afternoon.  After visiting the site during mid-March just before sunset, the locations of maximum shadows seemed similar to those in the photograph.  For example, the sidewalk along the south side of Commonwealth Avenue was markedly darker than the sidewalk on the north side of the street.  Thus, it is likely that the slight shifts in the shadow patterns on the site are negligible and that some sections of Kenmore Square receive considerably less sunlight annually than others.

            Pollution has also impacted the development of Kenmore Square.  When the first buildings on the site were being constructed at the turn of the twentieth century, two railroad lines passed through Kenmore Square.  Most likely powered by steam, these trains transported dirt and soot in addition to passengers.  The combustion of coal and wood in order to heat the water to drive the engines also resulted in the production of an excess of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide in the air.  The same pollution continued to contaminate Kenmore Square as the site was transformed from a center of railroad transportation to a major intersection for automobile traffic.    According to Spirn,
Poisonous gasses hang in the air above the street and toxic dust coats the roadway and sidewalk.  Cars, buses, and trucks congest the streets, accelerating and braking, emitting streams of carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and bits of lead and unburned fuel.6
Thus, the gasoline engines in the modern cars also emitted a great deal of toxic exhaust, especially during periods of heavy traffic which is a defining feature of Kenmore Square.  The combination of these excess gases with the dirt, soot, and remnants of fuel critically influenced the variety of flora and fauna that would be able to survive and prosper on the site.

            The first major effect of the distribution of sunlight and shadows coupled with the pollution created by automobiles is the development of microclimates within the confines of the site.  It is obvious from walking through Kenmore Square in March that there are some sections which are significantly warmer than others.  Observe the component of the park between both sides of Commonwealth Avenue in the photo on the left below.


fig3.jpg

Figure 3:  Photograph of the Remaining Snow in the Park

fig4.jpg

Figure 4:  Photograph of the Remaining Snow on the South Side of Commonwealth Avenue

Most of the surfaces appear dry and the only snow that remains from the previous week’s storm is a three square foot patch in the center.  Examine the picture on the right.  Snow and ice are abundant and the outer edge of the sidewalk is still quite slippery.  Yet this sidewalk is located just a few yards across the street from the dry park. Now compare the amount of light in both pictures, which were taken at approximately the same time.  It is clear that there is a considerably different climate in two sections of the site that are relatively close together.  These differing microclimates are due to the fact that the five story buildings along Commonwealth Avenue and Bay State Road block some of the sunlight and cast shadows on the roadways creating sidewalks that are cooler than those in the center of the Square.  In addition, the carbon dioxide gas expelled by the vehicles in the square is a “greenhouse gas,” and the elevated level of such gases in the air due to automobiles and buses is responsible for a part of the local increase in temperature in Kenmore Square and Boston as a whole.

            Moreover, the varying intensity of light throughout the Square greatly affects the ability for trees in certain locations to grow successfully.  The trees along the western part of Bay State Road outside of the boat shaped Myles Standish Hall are much smaller and appear much less healthy than those across the street near the brownstone residences.  This can be seen in the picture below. 

fig5.jpg

Figure 5:  Varying Tree Size Along Bay State Road



fig6.jpg

Figure 6:  Tree on Bay State Road Breaking the Sidewalk


The photograph of the snow lined Commonwealth Avenue above also indicates the same effect.  The trees in this shady portion of the square are obviously less developed.  The trees further down Bay State Road along both sides of the street seem to be more uniform in size, with the roots of several of them breaking apart the sidewalks.  Even so, it is always possible that there are other reasons why the trees in some portions of the square are larger and more developed than others.  For example, those outside of Myles Standish Hall may actually be younger than the rest of the trees in the square.  It is possible that Boston University may cut down the trees when they start to damage the sidewalks in order to prevent dangerous conditions from developing which could lead to liability.  Additionally, the growth of the trees alongside Commonwealth Avenue may also be stunted due to nutrient-drained, compacted soil underneath the nearby roadway which is much more heavily trafficked than the residential Bay State Road.

            Patterns of light and shadows also significantly influence the form of the trees in the square. The photograph on the left below shows a tree in the park at the center of Commonwealth Avenue.  The incline of the branches on the left side of the tree is much sharper than the slope of the branches on the right, and the majority of the volume of the tree seems to be to the right of the trunk.  The second graphic below shows another slender tree on Beacon Street.  It is actually growing on a slant with most of its branches spanning over the street. 

fig7.jpg

Figure 7:  Tree in the Park at the Center of Commonwealth Avenue

fig8.jpg

Figure 8:  Slender Tree on Beacon Street


This occurs because plants need light to produce food through photosynthesis, and they are extremely proficient at adapting to their environment in order to maximize the surface area that is exposed to the sun.  In direct sunlight, most plants mature symmetrically.  When there is a region near a tree with a greater amount of light, the organism will experience a positive phototropism and will respond to that stimulus by growing towards the light.  This model of tree growth is prevalent in Kenmore Square.  As a result, along Beacon Street, Commonwealth Avenue, and Bay State Road, the tree branches spread out over the street and up towards the sun, pointing away from the individual buildings.

            Finally, the dense human population present in the site, in conjunction with the pollution from automobiles and the location of shadows, has created an urban ecosystem which is unfavorable to many of the animals that originally inhabited the region.  This change can be observed in the following excerpt:
Pigeons, starlings, and house sparrows replace songbirds; hosts of rats infest buildings and sewers.  …  Most of the wildlife that does survive are not natives, but immigrants like rats, roaches, and scavenging birds, who adapted long ago to a landscape dominated by humans. 7
The photograph below shows a group of pigeons standing in the park at the center of Kenmore Square.

fig9.jpg

Figure 9:  Pigeons in the Park

They are rummaging for food particles left by humans which symbolize the species’ innate ability to utilize human garbage for survival.  Often described as “rats with wings,” 8   pigeons are characteristic of the birds that continue to live in the Square.  The shady back alley behind Beacon Street and Bay State Road is home to a series of dumpsters which has, in turn, provided shelter and sustenance for an extremely successful rat population.

            In conclusion, since Boston’s founding in 1630, the environment of the Kenmore Square site has been transformed from a subterranean section of the Charles River between salt meadows into a typical urban neighborhood.  Its development has been closely linked to the growth of the city of Boston as a whole, and the changes in the natural processes occurring on the site due to filling during the nineteenth century and the influx of automobiles during the twentieth century clearly resemble the environmental transformations taking place in other parts of the city such as the adjacent Back Bay.  Moreover, Kenmore Square is a microcosm of the natural processes that are characteristic of the urban environment in general.  Light dictates the location of successful and unsuccessful trees while greatly influencing the shape and symmetry of plants in nearly every setting.  Furthermore, the impact of pollution on a city is a challenge that has continually faced urban planners.  Frederick Law Olmsted attempted to combat the pollution and contamination in New York with Central Park and nearby Kenmore Square with the “Emerald Necklace” of parks.  Most importantly, Kenmore Square truly exemplifies the relationship between humans and nature within a city and the way in which plant and animal populations are capable of adapting to an urban environment.

                                                                                           

                  1 Anne Whiston Spirn,  The Granite Garden (Cambridge:  Basic Books, 1984) 14.

                    2 Henry Pelham, “A Plan of Boston in New England with its Environs, 1777.”  Map.  David Rumsey Map Collection.  6 Mar. 2003 <http://www.davidrumsey.com>.

                    3 Spirn 22.
               
                    4 Spirn 22.

                    5 “Mass GIS/MHD 2001 Color Ortho Imagery Viewer.”  Map.  Massachusetts Geographic Information System.  18 Mar. 2003 < http://maps.massgis.state.ma.us/MassGISColorOrthos/viewer.htm>.

                    6 Spirn 56.

                    7 Spirn 207.

                    8 BBC News, “In Defence of Pigeons” 19 Jan. 2001, 20 Mar. 2003 <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1125708.stm>.


All photographs were taken by the author, Matthew Herman.