Published by the MIT News Office at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
MIT STUDY International Links Crucial to Society MIT's broad and open links with the international science and technology community are crucial to its ability to serve American society, an MIT study has concluded. The study recommends that MIT continue these diverse links while strengthening and expanding its research and educational programs in support of American industry. "MIT's responsibility to the nation in which it was founded and nurtured is served first and foremost by maintenance of its position as a premier institution in education and research in science and technology," the report concludes. "The commitment to maintain preeminence requires that MIT be thoroughly engaged in international activities in science and technology and that its faculty, students, and research staff be able to interact fully and openly with, and stay abreast of, research wherever it is carried out." MIT's responsibility to the nation also "mandates a strong interest in America's economic health, calling for programs that go beyond the Institute's basic contribution through education and research." America's professional engineers and engineering deans both ranked MIT as the nation's top engineering school, according to a recent survey conducted by US News and World Report. Charles M. Vest, who was inaugurated as MIT's fifteenth president on May 10, said that "MIT must stand fast in its commitment to excellence, especially in these times when our nation faces unprecedented economic challenges. This requires that we reaffirm our responsibilities to American society at the same time as we continue to participate fully in the evolving international research community." "MIT's contributions to our society have arisen in large part from its dedication to the free and open exchange of ideas," said Political Science Professor Eugene Skolnikoff, chairman of the study group and former Director of the MIT Center for International Studies. "With the current trends toward the globalization of business and research, this willingness to share ideas and especially to learn from others is more important than ever to MIT--and to the nation," Professor Skolnikoff said. The study was commissioned in 1990 by the MIT administration in recognition of the changing international scene in which competence in science and technology has grown throughout the world, along with intensifying economic competition among nations. The review was in part prompted by public criticism by some members of Congress concerning MIT's links to foreign nations, which go back more than a century. The report, titled "The International Relationships of MIT in a Technologically Competitive World," acknowledges that MIT's national and international roles may occasionally clash. "In the resolution of such conflicts, we believe the administration, with the advice of the faculty, should give primary weight to the general responsibility to the nation," the report says. The study group's report ranged widely over a broad spectrum of international activities and issues. Specific conclusions and recommendations include: Research Sponsorship--In 1990, foreign-based companies sponsored approximately three percent of on-campus research at MIT. This support, which helps fund research in the US and keep American scientists abreast of research interests of foreign enterprises, is acceptable as long as it is conducted with the same conditions as US-sponsored research: it advances the research and education missions of MIT, fulfills the research goals of the faculty, provides an accessible and enriching experience for students, and can be freely and openly published and discussed. MIT faculty should continue to give emphasis to identifying research and education opportunities that are responsive to the needs of American industry, and to provide American companies with an early chance to get involved in promising research ideas. Visiting Scientists--Scientists from universities, government, and industry are invited to spend a semester or more at MIT to share their special skills and knowledge in ongoing research, and to learn from the research underway. Openness in the exchange of knowledge is a critical condition for the success of these visits. With genuine sharing, foreign visitors invited at faculty discretion to participate in research are as appropriate as domestic visitors. American industry, however, has sent relatively few visitors for these valuable extended visits. MIT should join with American companies to explore ways to increase the flow. Faculty Contacts with Industry--Contacts between faculty and industry in many fields are an important part of professional development, helping faculty stay abreast of needs, interests, and advances in their fields. These contacts also further MIT's commitment to the transfer of knowledge to the community. A recent survey has shown that faculty contacts of all kinds with American firms are three times as numerous as with either European or Japanese companies. Commercialization of Research--American firms in many industries are trailing their foreign counterparts in converting new ideas and information into products. In cooperation with industry, MIT has developed several major programs designed to address various facets of the problem. The president of MIT should consult with industrial leaders to make further progress in this critical area. The essential openness of university research must be maintained. Foreign Gifts--About 30 of 215 endowed chairs at MIT have been funded by foreign-based corporations. These and other gifts support the infrastructure of research and education at MIT, but do not influence the direction of or access to research, and thus need raise no special concerns. Foreign Graduate Students--In order to maintain MIT's record of contributions to society, academic quality should remain the overriding criterion for admission. The number of high-quality applicants from both the US and abroad far exceeds the number of places in such highly competitive departments as biology, and electrical engineering and computer science. It is therefore appropriate to provide space for a large proportion of American applicants in those departments, since this has no effect on the overall level of quality. It is important to note that an estimated 60 percent of international students receiving doctorates from US universities remain in the US, resulting in a significant net gain to American industries and universities. MIT/Japan Program--The report strongly endorses the MIT-Japan Science and Technology Program that for ten years has been educating MIT students with Japanese language and cultural skills and placing them in industrial, government and university laboratories in Japan for a year's internship. The program has been successful in providing for Americans in Japan the same kind of learning experience the much more numerous Japanese visitors have in the US, thus beginning to redress the imbalance. It has also formed the basis for a national initiative approved by the Congress in 1990, and similar programs have been adopted by other universities. Industrial Liaison Program (ILP)--Although access to MIT research is open to all, the ILP provides more efficient access to member companies for an annual fee. This service has served mostly American companies, but also has been particularly useful for foreign-based firms who do not share the same business day, language and culture as American firms. A study group survey showed, however, that US firms have five times as many contacts with faculty outside the ILP as through the ILP. Nonetheless, the ILP should boost its effort to increase the interaction between MIT and American industry. Because of the value of foreign contacts to MIT's research and educational programs, foreign membership should not be restricted. It is appropriate, however, that foreign firms be charged more than domestic firms for the service. MIT's Tokyo Office--This office was created over a decade ago to overcome the problems of managing relationships with Japanese firms and government posed by distance, time and cultural differences. The MIT administration should consider expanding the role of this office to actively assist members of the MIT community and US companies to become more familiar with science and technology in Japan. Internationalization of the Curriculum--To prepare MIT's graduates better for the realities of today's global society and marketplace, the faculty and administration should take steps to strengthen the international dimensions of the undergraduate curriculum. Educational Initiatives--MIT should consider new programs to aid in the improvement of science education at primary and secondary schools. Education at these levels is central to the nation's future international position. In concluding, the study group recommended that the office of the provost, in conjunction with the faculty, should have explicit responsibility for implementing these recommendations. The study group members were: Eugene Skolnikoff, chairman and professor of political science; Rudiger Dornbusch, professor of economics; Arnoldo Hax, professor of management; Nancy Hopkins, professor of biology; Eric Johnson, director of corporate relations; Arthur Kerman, professor of physics and director of the Laboratory for Nuclear Science; Philip Khoury, acting dean of the School of Humanities and Social Science and professor of history; Richard Lester, professor of nuclear engineering; Nicholas Negroponte, director of the Media Laboratory and professor of media technology; Jack Ruina, professor of electrical engineering and computer science; Richard Samuels, associate professor of political science and director of the MIT-Japan Science and Technology Program; Kenneth Smith, professor of chemical engineering and former associate provost and vice president for research; and David Hart, staff.