December 2th
2012, Colas Schretter,
Professional Development Committee
This document frames new guidelines for selecting
the shortlist of travel grant
recipients. Travel grants will be up to the amount of $400. For a budget of
$2000,
5 awards are given. Awardees will
be reimbursed upon submission of applicable
receipts to the Treasurer of the
This program is made possible
by funding from the MIT Postdoctoral Association
(
Spring deadline: 1st April 2013 http://fluidsurveys.com/surveys/mit-pda/ctg-1/
The online application form will collect the following
information:
1. Name
2. MIT email address
3.
4. Department and group or lab
5. Name of your principal investigator
6. MIT email address of your principal investigator
7. Conference name, date and location
8. Title, authors and abstract of your accepted paper at
the conference
9. Copy of the paper acceptance
notification email
10. List of your four most recent publications
11. Explain briefly why do you
need a MIT
12. Describe in layman terms
the significance and impact of your project
For being eligible, the applicant must:
1. Be a current MIT post-doc
2. Properly fill out every sections of the application
form
3. Submit only a single application form
4. Have not received a past travel grant award from the
MIT
5. Not be involved in any committees of the MIT
6. Be presenting a talk or a poster at
the conference
7. Send the application form before the start of the
conference
Before ranking, eligibility criteria are
checked first. The application form must be
complete and convincing. Scientific merits and originality of
submitted works will
be judged only, not the overall quality of applicants. A
compelling description of
significance and impact of the project will be particularly
appreciated.
For selection, each member of the
short phrase of comment and a tag for every application to the Professional
Development Chair. Tags are O:
outstanding, G: good, P: poor, N: non-eligible. A
short list of compelling applications will be defined and the
consensus list of
awardees will be decided in a round table discussion among all reviewers.