CAES has decided to maintain their own MIThenge web page. The CAES MIThenge page includes predictions of MIThenge for the next 100 years.
As viewed from a stationary point on the earth, the path of the sun through the sky is roughly a circle which moves north and south as the seasons go by. In mid-November and in late January every year, the circular path crosses the axis of MIT's Infinite Corridor, which runs a distance of 825 feet (251 meters) from the main entrance on Massachusetts Avenue through Buildings 7, 3, 10, 4 and 8. When this happens, the setting sun can be seen from the far end of the corridor. By analogy with Stonehenge, this phenomenon is sometimes called "MIThenge". (The same cannot be seen at sunrise because the other end of the infinite corridor is blocked by Building 18.)
![]() |
![]() |
| January 2001. Photograph by Matt Yourst | November 1999. Photograph by Joseph Kaye\font> |
![]() |
If you have more photographs of the sun through the length of the infinite corridor, please send them to me if they're in electronic form, or contact me if you want me to come by to scan them. If your photographs are precisely dated and timed, even better: this helps our understanding of the corridor's azimuth and the light-bending effects of the atmosphere needed to correctly predict when MIThenge will occur. There appears to be a systematic error in the calculations on the order of 5-8 minutes that I'm trying to track down. |
| February 2, 1998. Photograph by Paul Schechter, courtesy Rainer Weiss |
Date Time Altitude 11/10/2001 16:17:49 1:06:27 11/11/2001 16:19:05 0:45:46 11/12/2001 16:20:20 0:26:00 11/13/2001 16:21:36 0:06:54 11/14/2001 16:22:51 -0:11:12 Date Time Altitude 1/27/2002 16:50:45 -0:04:46 1/28/2002 16:49:50 0:13:46 1/29/2002 16:48:53 0:33:12 1/30/2002 16:47:53 0:53:38 1/31/2002 16:46:53 1:14:35
At some point, some portion of the sun's disc will be visible from the far end of the corridor. Which part of the disc will be seen first depends on whether the sun is crossing above or below the corridor. If the altitude in the table above is high, the sun will cross the upper right edge of the corridor as seen from the lower left. If the altitude is low, the sun will cross from the center left of the corridor and set below the hill.
The disc of the sun is close to the area of sky visible from the end of the corridor. Therefore if your timing is right and you get a good vantage point you will see almost nothing of the sky except for the interior of the sun's disc.
Observing this event depends strongly on atmospheric conditions. I think the best is a very red sunset. This decreases the total light intensity and makes it possible to see the corridor and the sun at the same time. If the sky is brilliantly transparent right down to the horizon then the setting sun will be too bright to look at. When you use a filter to save your eyes (see below) you won't be able to see much of the corridor.
The period of time during which the sun can be seen from the corridor end is quite short -- no more than two minutes, and only as long as that under ideal conditions.
These predictions depend on knowing the azimuth of the infinite to an
accuracy of several arc-minutes. The best figure we have found is the
accurately surveyed azimuth of MIT's property line along Memorial
Drive, which is given as 245.47391075 degrees true. (Note that at this
precision, an error of 1 in the last decimal place corresponds to a
crosswise error of 438 angstroms over the length of the infinite
corridor, or to shooting a bullet from the earth at the center of the
sun and missing the center by 29 yards.) According to Michael K. Owu '86 of the (apparently
now-defunct) MIT Planning
Office, the Infinite Corridor should have been constructed
parallel to this line. Manual measurements on the adjacent 0.5 meter
resolution orthophoto (courtesy MIT
Course 11's ortho.mit.edu and MassGIS) come up with
essentially this same number within their precision, which alone would
be good enough to expect around a minute of error in predicted
times. Other possible causes of error include computer program bugs,
problems with the atmospheric model, carelessness, and a suspected
non-levelness of the infinite corridor.
The predictions are obtained today with xephem (available on Athena), the given azimuth, a GPS-surveyed lat/lon for the East side of the infinite corridor, and a guess at the barometric pressure. None of these factors except the azimuth matters much to the final result, and the figures thus obtained tend to be identical (to the second) to what Ken Olum has previously predicted using unknown means. My current hunch is that our understanding of the infinite corridor's slope may be off. On the day Professor Schechter shot his above photograph (2/2/98), the sun's altitude was 1'58'' (almost 2 degrees) when it was at the right azimuth (4:44:48, with the photograph marked as "4:45"), with very little dependence (+/- five arcminutes) on temperature and barometric pressure. By our predictions (with the infinite corridor approximately 9 feet by 13 feet by 825 feet), this should not even have been visible.
Here is a graph showing the path of the center of the sun and its lower edge the day the picture was shot, using the same methodology used to predict MIThenge events. As you can see, the Sun disc comes nowhere near a level infinite corridor. The azimuth appears to be correct and confirmed by the "4:45" notation from the photograph, but the elevation seems to be way off. (Note: the plot says, "Time extent: 4:40 to ..." but the bottom of the Sun disc does not actually start to show up on the plot until 4:42:57.) If indeed the infinite corridor is tilted up as much as would be necessary to see this predicted sun, that would mean the floor in building 7 is higher (in ellipsoid height) than the ceiling in building 8. This seems hard to believe.
You can help improve the predictions by taking sightings during the event. Especially valuable are photographs from the length of the corridor with a precise timestamp, particularly if they show only half of the doorway on the far side of the corridor filled with the sun. If the entire doorway is filled with the sun, that's okay too, but then we don't know what part of the sun you ended up photographing (middle, side, etc.) I am not an expert in solar photography; you should make sure not to damage your camera.