Received: from PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU by po8.MIT.EDU (5.61/4.7) id AA28552; Thu, 27 Aug 98 16:49:37 EDT
Received: from defiant.bfi.com by MIT.EDU with SMTP
	id AA05079; Thu, 27 Aug 98 16:49:36 EDT
Received: from w013739.bfi.com (DEFIANT.bfi.com [10.10.250.63]) by defiant.bfi.com (AIX4.2/UCB 8.7/8.7) with SMTP id PAA82780 for <pmitros@mit.edu>; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 15:45:28 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <35E5C6CE.17D5@geocities.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1998 15:51:26 -0500
From: Swapan Sarkar <swapan@geocities.com>
Reply-To: swapan@geocities.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; U)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: pmitros@MIT.EDU
Subject: A nice observation of events surrounding LSA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I wanted to know whether there is a mirror of this paper, if so then
it could be mentioned at the top so that this site is not heavily
loaded. Another thing was whether the media like C|net and ZDnet saw
this article and gave a followup on the whole issue.
  If I am not mistaken I had read about a court ruling which prohibitted
somebody (other than the owner unless he rejects it) to own a site based
on a trademark, so although anobody could own TV.com or television.org
but not SONY.COM/SONY.ORG Another thing which I wanted to know is isn't
there any restriction of commercial companies owning .org domain names ?
They could own linux.com but not linux.org site.

I would love to hear anything on these.
Regards.
-swapan