next up previous contents
Next: Gap acceptance Up: Lane Changing Previous: Lane Changing

Lane Change Decisions

The decision to look for a lane change depends on traffic conditions, driver's destination and behavior characteristics (e.g. from conservative to aggressive). MITSIM classifies lane changes into two types: mandatory and discretionary. Mandatory lane changing occurs when drivers have to change lanes in order to:

  1. connect to the next link on their path;
  2. bypass a lane blockage downstream;
  3. avoid entering and using a restricted lane; or,
  4. respond to LUS or VMS (e.g. warning of lane drop).
Discretionary lane changing refers to cases in which drivers change lane in order to increase speed, bypass a slower or heavy vehicle, avoid the lane connected to a ramp, etc. In Figure 3.5 the freeway diverges into two routes. White vehicles are going to route 1 and black vehicles to route 2. Drivers may begin to consider lane connections at different times, some earlier and some later. For example, vehicle C and 3 are in the wrong lane and looking for a mandatory lane change. Vehicles D and 4 are in the correct lane but are looking for a discretionary lane change into the lanes connected to their path. Vehicle J, since it is far from the downstream node and is not concerned about lane connection, is making a discretionary lane change to the opposite direction.

   figure653
Figure 3.5: Lane changes

If a downstream node has multiple outgoing links, vehicles approaching that node are tagged as having a mandatory state according to a certain probability. Before a vehicle is tagged with mandatory state, both the left and right lanes can be the target lane of a discretionary lane change. After being tagged to mandatory state, the vehicle can seek two types of lane changes: (i) if the current lane is not connected to the next link on its path, it will make a mandatory lane change or a series of mandatory lane changes so as to move onto a lane leading to the next link; and (ii) if the current lane is connected to its next link on the path, then it can only make discretionary lane changes onto lanes that also connect to its path. The types of lane changes and their relationship with mandatory state are depicted in Figure 3.6. In the following, we describe how the probability used to tag vehicles to mandatory state is determined.

   figure660
Figure 3.6: Mandatory state and lane change types

Assume that, at a particular position and congestion level, the probability a vehicle should be tagged to mandatory state can be written as:

  equation665

where:

tex2html_wrap_inline3164
probability of vehicle n has been tagged to mandatory state at point tex2html_wrap_inline3082 ;
tex2html_wrap_inline3082
distance from the vehicle to the downstream node (or lane drop);
tex2html_wrap_inline3172
distance of a critical location, which may be associated to the position of a particular message sign (such as final exit warning);

and tex2html_wrap_inline3174 is a variable defined as follows:

  equation675

where:

tex2html_wrap_inline3176
number of lanes that the vehicle needs to cross in order to be in the target lane;
K
indicator of traffic congestion, which is defined as the density of the segment divided by the jam density;
tex2html_wrap_inline3180
model parameters.

As depicted in Figure 3.7(a), the probability given by Eq (3.15) increases to 1 as the vehicle approaches the critical position. When the number of necessary lane changes and traffic congestion increases, this probability also goes up as shown by the different curves in Figure 3.7(a).

   figure683
Figure 3.7: Probability of tagging vehicles to mandatory state

The simulator draws a random number in each iteration to decide whether an untagged vehicle should be tagged to mandatory state. Let tex2html_wrap_inline3182 be the probability to tag a vehicle at time interval i. Then its relationship with tex2html_wrap_inline3186 - the probability that the vehicle should have been tagged upto ith time interval - can be represented recursively as the following:

equation692

Since tex2html_wrap_inline3190 , tex2html_wrap_inline3192 , tex2html_wrap_inline3194 , tex2html_wrap_inline3196 and tex2html_wrap_inline3186 are known at the ith time interval, tex2html_wrap_inline3182 can be written as:

  equation711

An example of the results obtained from Eq (3.18) is illustrated in Figure 3.7(b). The curves in this figure will shift down if the simulation step size decreases, and vice versa. In other words, tex2html_wrap_inline3204 obtained from Eq (3.18) depends on the sampling rate. This is to guarantee that the probability a vehicle has been tagged at a given condition is independent from the simulation step size.

When a vehicle has been tagged to mandatory state, it keeps that state until it has performed the desired lane change or moved into the downstream link.

For discretionary lane changing, the decision to stay or change is based on traffic conditions of both the current lane and adjacent lanes. If a vehicle has a speed lower than the driver's desired speed due to a slow vehicle in front or the maximum speed of that lane, it checks the neighboring lanes for opportunities to increase its speed. Several parameters, including an impatience factor and a speed indifference factor, are used to determine whether the current speed is low enough and the speeds in adjacent lanes are sufficiently high to consider making a lane change.

In order to decide on the lane to move into, the vehicle first determines the set of admissible lanes. A lane is defined as admissible based on several criteria including lane changing regulation, lane use privilege, lane connectivity, incident, lane use signs, message signs, prevailing traffic conditions, driver's desired speed, lane's maximum speed tex2html_wrap_inline2946 , and whether the vehicle is in mandatory state.


next up previous contents
Next: Gap acceptance Up: Lane Changing Previous: Lane Changing

Qi Yang
Wed Feb 26 19:17:06 EST 1997