The Divergent Flavors of Deliverance
Dumping Demons: So Many Paths
Getting rid of dark spirits is an unexpectedly vast field, despite so few people being involved with it.
Here are some Christ-centered variations on a theme.
- Deliverance. See below. This page will address only Deliverance, mostly as practiced by Pentecostal/Charismatic people.
- Exorcism is a Catholic thing that requires ordained priests doing specific rituals.
- Spirit releasement... unfortunately tainted with New Age quite a bit and very rarely Christ-centered, so very
little data that I know of.
Deliverance
- Standard warfare model: Most deliverance styles use the
warfare model that says there's a war on Earth, and God set it up so
that humans (thanks to Jesus) now have the authority to remove demons
and bless Creation. Unfortunately or fortunately, not only do humans
have the authority, but they seem to have the responsibiity in this
view. That is to say, humans generally need to do it, or it won't
happen. This is THE primary deliverance outlook. Usually deliverence
in this paradigm involves commanding evil spirits to leave (with
add-ons such as sending spiritual fire, sending in extra angels,
etc.). There are some variations in how much authority a person is
thought to have as well.
- Some (e.g. Bethel in Redding) say that Jesus gives us us authority
over every kind of supernatural (and natural) power in
existence. (Ephesians 2:6 building on Ephesians 1:21)
- Some say that Jesus gives us authority over every kind of
supernatural (and maybe natural) power EXCEPT for "cosmic beings"
(e.g. 2 Peter 2:10 or Jude 1:8-10).
- Some warn that certain levels of authority are only for a select few who
are called by God to take up those positions, and that unwisely trying to
challenge spiritual powers can cause open the door to great harm and demonic
retribution. (See Needless Casualties of War by John Paul Jackson.)
- Even the topic of whether a person can command God's angels is a matter of
debate.
More below in the
next section.
- Non-warfare, faith-only model: Bob DeWaay has
an opposing view where he suggests that typical warfare
deliverance is all a demonic set-up and charade. The only way to be freed is for
God to lead a person to repentence and faith: in other words, God
calls the shots, and our job is to have faith. He writes that "Those
who believe are 'saved to the utomost' (see Hebrews 7:25) and need not
fear the hostile spiritual forces of the universe. The means of grace
provided in the Bible are sufficient...." He no longer advocates
trying to cast demons out of believers; he instead "patiently teach
the truth, trusting that God will use it to change lives. God can
deliver the most demonized sinner... through the power of the
Gospel.... I [believe] in the power of the gospel."
- Courtrooms of Heaven: I'm not sure where exactly this falls. I think
it's more of a Warfare approach than not - it's just that it takes place in
heavenly courtrooms. See near the end of this document.
Within the Warfare model are several different approaches
for difficult cases.
- "What opened the door?" view. This is the most common form
of deliverance in cases where simply binding and trying to cast out
demons fails. If evil spirits are not easily cast out, the counselor
tries to figure out why the enemy has gained ground into a person's
life. This may take many different forms of counseling, to be outlined
below.
- No-digging, just have enough faith
model. Curry Blake may be one
of the best known proponents of this philosophy (another proponent is
the online Inside Out Training and Equipping School). Blake's view is
the person commanding healing/deliverance just needs to have enough
faith and perseverence and commitment (and truly believe everything in
the New Testament). His view is that the only limits to effectiveness
are those placed by the unbelieving mind. Some of Blake's Divine
Healing Technicians (DHTs) also put the burden for faith more on the
person asking for healing/deliverance. In any case, Blake
views digging around for
"generational curses," old transgresions, or other such things to be a
form of "looking back" that is unbiblical, unethical, and dangerous
for a counselor to delve into, as well as a hindering belief that will
limit effectiveness. One DHT also goes so far as to say deliverance
books are demonic (and frankly to some extent I think he has a point;
many stoke up fear more than anything). Curry Blake also has the
interesting distinction of being one of the few people out there who
views healing and deliverance as a proactive duty. He sees believing
Christians as local beat cops whose job it is to stop crimes (like
demonic activity) from taking place. Therefore, he has little
patience for the philosophy of waiting for the Holy Spirit to tell a
person to go heal/deliver others (though he does believe in obeying
anything the Holy Spirit does say!). He sees it as a Christian duty to
follow Matthew 10:8 in day to day living, with or without explicit
orders from God. Caveats: Although I like the go-get-em
no-holds-barred attitude, some of his students placing the
healing/deliverance failure blame on the person asking for help is a
little off-putting. And also, there are no fallback tools beyond "try
it again" or "read the Bible more and just believe it." People
injured by religion will likely find this difficult, for example.
Testimony: Someone
on JGLM.org's testmony about no-digging helping ministry a lot.
Among the "What opened the door"/"Digging" view there are many approaches and techniques.
- Holy Spirit-led. Foremost, and throughout all the below
methods, the counselor is supposed to listen for guidance from the
Holy Spirit. Whether this actually happens in every case (as opposed
to the success cases presented to the public) is debateable. Some
counselors won't even touch a case without approval from the Holy
Spirit (contrast with Curry Blake's cop-like attitude). It also seems
that many "digging" deliverances require a "word of knowledge" or
other hint from the Holy Spirit in order to be successfully
resolved. (It should also be noted that tough cases may take years to
work out.) Caveats: It is frustrating to me that, at least from
what I've seen, it's so much easier for most people to call up demons
for Q & A (or more like Questions & Lies) than to get answers
from the Holy Spirit. This may frustrate others, too.
- Questioning the demons for clues, such as their names
and/or the person's "open doors" (see next). Not everyone does this;
like me, some people find this a little iffy, given demons' entire
existences seem to revolve around lying and deceiving and destroying.
The group called the Elijah House (John Sandford) comes out vehemently
against this (though they are themselves accused by other Christians
of being New Age). That said, a lot of traditional deliverance
philosophy seems to be built on this model of getting demons to
"spill" reasons for a person's difficulty. This technique usually
requires the client
channel the demon, allowing or forcing the demon to speak
through the client's mouth. It is generally not at all pleasant for
the person doing this. Caveats: There are stories of success
from this model, but also a few stories of demons just playing
charades and pretending to leave. Also, demons speaking or manifesting
through a person is just plain yucky or even sometimes mentally
damaging for the person they speak through. Some sites go so
far as to say ministries that rely on this are deceived and false.
- The repent and renounce (and heal) model. This is another
foundational piece in traditional deliverance counseling. It involves
finding wrong beliefs, sins, "soul ties," "generational curses," and
other problems that allow demons "access." These also may include
ancestors' sins and occult involvement. Repeating back sentences like,
"Lord, I repent of doing such-and-such. I renounce it. Please forgive
me. In Jesus' Name I pray." Or doing it on behalf of ancestors. A
number of deliverance books seem to just be a checklist of possible
sins. Reading through the list can be kind of like slogging through a
cesspool-like catalog of depravities one may not have thought of
before. Some counselors (like Dr. Charles H. Kraft) even require an
intake form where one lists every known sin/occult event/trauma one
can remember. Caveats: The laundry lists of sin, descriptions
of evil, and digging up the past can cause more trauma, nightmarish
images, and fear. Not to mention it feels kind of ridiculous to have
to make a laundry list of mistakes and sins, when "no digging, only
faith" model counselors point out that Jesus never did that and yet
managed to cast out demons.
- Operating only from rest. Basically, a lot of people assert
that we need to be in a place of rest and worship of God. Graham
Cooke's assertion is (paraphrased) that warfare is too often a trick
of the enemy to get us to stop resting in, trusting in, and
worshipping the Lord. Others echo this, saying that rather than
jumping into binding the enemy and such, we should be worshipping and
being in the peace and joy of God. THEN if needed and if God leads us,
we can start doing typical warfare things like binding, calling fire,
casting out, etc. One experienced deliverance counselor goes so far as
to say that warfare without being in a place of rest is like being one
of the Sceva brothers (in the New Testament, they tried to do
deliverance and lost the battle because they weren't really connected
with Jesus). The best help I've received have been those who emphasize
being in the Presence of the Lord, rather than those who are about
technique and textbook approaches. Spirit-led suggestions for how to
better do this have been helpful. (Textbook or "I just do this" or
"Just read the Bible more" suggestions have not been helpful to me.)
Being closer to the Lord and verbally focusing on the Lord seems to
create an atmosphere that enemy agents don't like - far more
effectively than just commanding them to get out.
- Inner healing practices. Especially for deeply traumatized
people. These practices can include:
- Bethel-style Sozo. Bethel Church in Redding, CA, started a
program called "Sozo" that at
least theoretically relies on the Holy Spirit to lead a team of
counselors to figure out why a person is in need of deliverance or
healing. ("Sozo" in the ancient Greek meaning encompasses healing,
deliverance, AND salvation and is used extensively in the New
Testament; somewhat unfortunately it now means this specific style of
counseling.) Caveats: Not always very helpful or effective. Their more heavy-duty
program is "shabar" and follows the model of reintegrating alters (below).
- Elijah House and Theophostic. Elijah House appears to be a
fairly well-known (or infamous) organization that teaches that
unrepented sin and lies believed even from childhood will echo on
through a person's life and into the future until destroyed at the
Cross. They dig for these unrepented sins and falsehoods ("bitter
roots") to free individuals. Theophostic appears to be an offshoot
style of counseling that itself is putting out new offshoots, at least
judging from how many inner healing groups reference
it. Caveats: Critics charge Elijah House with being too occult,
though it seems tame compared to newer inner healing schools. There
appear to be cases where false traumatic memories were "discovered" -
apparently leading to havoc in families. There are
also charges
that Theophostic is deception and that it's just demons leading people
deeper into occultism. (Note: the last link is by someone who
nonetheless seems to support other types of "digging" for
deliverance.)
- Variants of Theophostic such as Immanuel Approach. Just for
reference: link to the
Immanuel Approach. I think Dr. Kraft (mentioned elsewhere) are
sort of similar as well.
- Counseling for deeply damaged/fragmented souls (alters). I thought
"fragmented souls" was a New Age thing used by deceptive spirits only,
but Bethel and other groups/counselors have several different
approaches for finding and integrating "alters" (portions of the soul
that split off during emotional trauma). Each alter can theoretically
harbor demons. The literature reports some good results. Some books on
this topic treat "alters" almost like separate spirits, but which
require "reintegration" into a person. Although this personally freaks
me out a bit because it is so similar to the New Age teaching, it is
possible there is truth to it and the New Age ran off with it. Here
are some quick examples of healing techniques:
- Walking through the past and picturing Jesus at traumatic events from the past. (e.g. Kraft) This is pretty close to Theophostic (above).
- Talking to "alters" and counseling them to each receive Jesus. This seems to
be a pretty standard thing, but is apparently slow.
- Special techniques involving the Holy Spirit and dealing with a
"primary" or "core" alter to achieve faster integration than the usual
slow course of talking to each one. Or, just addressing a bunch of
alters all at once. Example:
Freedom Encounters
does some kind of mass-integration of a bunch of alters/fragments, at
least in theory. They also believe in breaking off generational curses.
- Heartsync is another counseling technique that is said to
be more effective and faster than Bethel-style Sozo. I've grouped it
with other re-integration counseling services, as it specifically is
meant to address dissociation
issues and fragmentation. They appear to also utilize Immanuel Approach (mentioned above).
- (For independent reading, there really is not a lot about alter
integration in published book form. For stuff related to the topic,
you might check out Candyce Roberts Help for the Fractured
Soul, Dr. Charles Kraft (not totally on-topic but close) Two
Hours to Freedom, Kathi Oates Open My Heart Lord, a case
where integration took years: Sarah Shaw (or Shaw Sarah on
Amazon) Sarah, Dr. Lehman's Immanuel Approach book
(available online only, in draft form, as of this writing). Shabar
materials from Bethel may also be relevant. You may have better luck
just searching online for "integrating" "alters" "Jesus.")
- Deep rescue for alters: I just read about a model of
deliverance that involves going (in the Spirit, not physically) to
where soul fragments are being held captive, and freeing them
directly. Generally requires the direct help of the Holy Spirit to
find the fragment/alter and rescue it. Also presents a reasonable
theory for why Jesus managed to do incredible deliverances on the
spot: He had actually gone in spirit beforehand and set the alters
free, making the rest of the deliverance (the actual casting out of
demons) a piece of cake by comparison. Example: Ana Mendez Ferrell's
Regions of Captivity.
- Get yourself a covering philosophy. This view holds that
people live under others' authority for their own protection. This
isn't just the old husbands and wives thing, but also includes
political leaders and church leaders. Basically the person with more
earthly authority can (according to this view) screw up or help
protect the people below them. The people lower in the structure gain
maximum protection by praying for and submitting to those higher
up. Caveats: This can be a hard philosophy to accept, and may
be unhelpful for people whose direct coverings are abusive, ignorant, and/or
uncaring.
- Courtooms of Heaven. This is a whole big vast subject that
isn't really centered on deliverance, but can include deliverance and
healing. Courtrooms of Heaven is what I like to call a "cutting edge
charismatic Christianity" technique. This involves going into
courtrooms in non-physical realms (you really need to make sure you're
in the divine ones, not the fake ones run by the enemy), and
presenting a case and winning it both through washing away sins with
the Blood of Jesus Christ, and/or other legal techniques. There are
many layers and levels of courtroom, and only those with authority and
expertise should try for higher courts. Ability to travel in the
spirit, or prophesy accurately or see in the spirit, are highly
recommended for this. As a side note, the enemy can appeal verdicts
made in the mobile court... so you may need to keep going back to
check for appeals.....
Caveats: It can be dangerous to go unprepared to the
Courtrooms. There is deception (false courts), and there are
protocols to follow, as well as repercussions for mistakes. Been
there, done THAT. Ugh.
Commonalities
Among all deliverance theories above, Jesus still remains the focus
and the ideal. Scripture is generally used to justify most techniques
(though with the deep counseling, there is less Scriptural support).
All would probably agree that a person should seek Jesus, and not RELY
on people, for help; however, it remains clear that counseling of SOME
type is generally what a demonized person needs, even if it is counseling
to build up faith and get a person to wholly commit to Jesus. All
would probably also agree that getting rid of fear and other such
things is vital (though how to do so is another matter).
Counselors would also probably generally agree that "renewing
the mind" is very important - that is, to develop the mind of
Christ and to trust, obey, and rely on Jesus and Scripture.
BUT SIDENOTE ON MIND OF CHRIST: I have now heard a couple
times that deliverance problems may be caused by generational issues
more often than not. In fact, I've now heard that sometimes, the first
person to become Christian in a lineage may be so burdened by
generational issues that it's very hard to renew the mind and hold
onto faith or read Scripture. Personally, I think that would explain a
lot.... So if that describes YOU, don't blame yourself for lack of
faith!
So much division....
In researching deliverance ministries, I read a whole bunch of
Christian theology. There's a lot of very interesting stuff, but I was
saddened to see the amount of discord and finger-pointing. Many people
and organizations accuse others of heresy and deception. A favorite
target is Bethel in Redding, for example, which is pretty conservative
to me, but to most other conservative Christian groups it apparently
is pretty liberal, is considered "hyper-Charismatic," and even almost
New Age (a viewpoint I can understand, given the stories I've
read). Sometimes there is finger pointing back and forth. "Heresy and
occultism!" on the one hand, or "You're limiting the Holy Spirit and
you're in bondage to the spirit of religion" on the other. Serious
charges include examples of people coming into new or worsened demonic
oppression as a result of following particular schools of thought or
seeking certain forms of deliverance help. The oppression may even
occur years later and apparent gains can be lost. These sorts of
accusations of deception and problems are all over the place.
Is there truth to these claims of heresy, occult influence, and
people coming under demonic influence due to particular organizations
and styles of counseling? I'm sure there is, because there IS evil at
work in the world. I think any reasonably intelligent enemy would take
every opportunity to sow discord and deception at every turn. I think
even valid techniques and theologies will be nibbled around the edges
by deceptive spirits and human pitfalls of pride, myopia, and
ignorance. As a result, I think there will never be a 100% successful
technique or ministry. I think there will always be casualties who
come out worse than they came in, maybe even with more demonic
problems. And yes, I think there are just plain bad practitioners and
bad theologies, too.
On the flip side, when I used to have big issues with accounts of
healings done by people with extremist theologies, a friend (who might
be considered a heretic by many) pointed out to me that God often
works through us despite our theological failures. Curry Blake
(who is also maligned as a heretic by some) suggests there are so few
people willing to walk in healing, that God will use just about anyone
who perseveres. In fact, if one thinks about it, no human being on
Earth is going to be perfect, and two people will never share exactly
the same theology. God HAS to be able to work with us despite our
imperfections, or else He could get nothing done through human
beings.
In other words, the enemy can make even good, effective techniques
cause failures, deception, harm. BUT God is so much bigger, more
proactive, more committed, more determined - right? So I'm starting to
think that God can take even our flawed, fallible methodologies and
use them to save, heal, and rescue as many people as possible. Because
God is that good.
What's Best?
I seriously have no idea. It occurs to me that there are now enough
people practicing deliverance, including people who casually learn how
to do it from friends and online classes, who see visible results,
that it's hard for me to believe ALL of it is a deception. I rather
suspect most of the techniques are valid in certain
circumstances. However, as I mentioned, any reasonably intelligent
enemy would seek to sow discord and confusion wherever possible. Do
some people seeking divine healing and supernatural help from the Holy
Spirit (like "getting slain in the spirit" or "speaking in tongues")
get demonized? You bet (I already have some material about that on my
site). Do some people seeking deliverance get pulled into worse
situations? Yeah I'm sure of that, too. Do some people come out
victorious and go on to transformed, positive, inspired living? I'm
pretty sure that happens as well. Is it best to seek God most of all,
to trust God more than any human being, to seek God's will throughout,
and forgive deliverance counselors their foibles and failings? Yeah,
that's what I think the upshot is for me.
Back to "What About Deliverance?"