|
In the Classic system, the calc code field
contained key information about whether an
agreement was on or off campus, and about the kinds
of F&A charges that would be made to the WBS.
In SAP, this information is determined by the
costing sheet assignment. Beginning with the July
statements, we are no longer showing calc code, but
instead, the name of the costing sheet assigned to
the cost object.
The costing sheet name describes the base used
for the calculation of F&A charges (MTDC, for
example), whether the F&A calculation is for a
general cost object (cost center), a fund (orders
and wbs between 2000000 and 4999999) or a research
project (wbs between 5000000 and 9999999), and
whether the project is on or off campus. For all
sponsored cost objects (wbs elements) the header
shows whether the cost object uses standard billing
rates, or if some other rate is used. If a
different rate is being used, that rate is
displayed. If an agreement is "fixed for the life
of the award", the rates at which it is fixed are
shown, even if they are the same as the current
year's standard billing rates.
|
|
In this new statement version, when a user
requests that a summary statement or DTR be printed
locally, the screen that pops up asks whether the
user would like "Portrait" or "Landscape". If
"Landscape" is selected, the user will get the same
result as previously -- there is no change to this
version.
The Portrait option has been designed so that if
the user has requested 5 columns of financial data,
all 5 will fit on a single page. For example, a
user could request the budget column, the current
month, the cumulative, the commitment column, and
the uncommitted column, and all five would fit on a
single page.
If 6 or 7 columns are selected, 4 will appear on
the first page, and 2 or 3 will appear on the
second page.
Two problems with the Portrait version have been
identified. First, when the additional columns
appear on a second page, the way the pages are
numbered could be improved. We are looking into a
clearer way to identify the page with the
additional columns, but are aware that most users
requesting the "Portrait" option are interested in
5 or fewer columns. For these users, page numbering
will not be an issue.
The second problem is that when calculated
columns are selected (that is, "Unexpended" or
"Uncommitted"), if the columns on which the
calculation is being done are not also selected to
print, the result may be incorrect. For example, if
budget, current month, and unexpended are selected,
the unexpended column will only show the difference
between the budget and cumulative, for the cost
element "rows" where there is a value in the budget
or current month column. If there is a value in the
cumulative column (not displayed) but no value in
the budget or current month column, the row will
not display. Since the entire row does not display,
the net unexpended amount will not be correct.
We will be working to correct this problem
during August, but wanted users to have a wide
opportunity to view this prototype and give us
feedback, while we complete these further
corrections and modifications.
|
|
We hope that users will find the portrait
version of the DTR easier to work with when
reviewing detailed transactions. In most cases, the
information displayed is the same as in the
"landscape" version, and only the white space on
the page has been reduced. In this presentation, it
is easier to see the relationship between the line
item text, and the dollar amounts.
In a few cases, fields displayed in the
"description" area are shortened, in the landscape
version. For example, Vendor name has been reduced
from 40 characters to 20 characters. We would
particularly like feedback from users on the
useability of these statements from this point of
view. If truncated field displays have eliminated
valuable information, please let us know.
|
|
We have identified a problem with the
calculation of F&A charges on commitments, done
in the SAP Summary Statement. While the calculated
amounts on actuals appear correct, in some cases
the calculated F&A charges on commitments are
overstated. We are also working to correct this
problem, and will keep users informed of our
progress.
Please write with any questions or reporting
problems to <reporting@mit.edu>.
|