| Lecturer: |
Cesnik |
| Pre/co requisites: |
16.20 |
Hours From Bulletin: |
4-0-8 |
| Response Rate: |
26/ |
Actual Hours: |
3.8--6.6 |
| Course Ratings |
Instructor Ratings |
| Course Difficulty: |
/ 7.0 |
| Overall Course Rating: |
6 / 7.0 |
|
| Cesnik |
(L) |
6.7 / 7.0 |
| Ortega-Morales |
(T) |
/ 7.0 |
|
16.210 introduces analysis techniques for complex structures including the role of material
properties. Material covered includes energy principles, statically-indeterminate structures,
matrix and finite-element methods, fracture mechanics, fatigue and design for longevity.
Overall, students found 16.210 to be an interesting and useful class. Students felt that
Prof. Cesnik was well organized, enthusiastic and cared a lot about the students' success
in the course. Students felt that lecture and the problem sets were important in learning
the material. There was a wide range in time spent on problem sets and studying, from 4
hours a week to 12 hours a week. Most students did not find the recitation to be very useful,
although some did feel it helped them with their problem sets. The 16.20 textbook, a good
background in basuc structures and knowledge of Matlab were cited as useful to success in
the course. Students did mention that class tended to finish late.
The term project received some mixed reviews. Although there were positive comments about
the content of the project, students did not like the software package used and they heartily
recommended changes in that area. Students also felt that the timing at the end of the term
was stressful with the term project and a final, and they recommended both reducing the number
of quizzes or problem sets to compensate and starting the term project earlier.
Very well taught, excellent
No more PDE toolbox please!
| Subject |
| was graded fairly: |
5.5 / 7.0 |
| was organized and displayed continuity: |
6 / 7.0 |
| was well-administered: |
/ 7.0 |
| had accessible lab facilities: |
/ 7.0 |
| Instructor |
Cesnik |
Ortega-Morales |
| Gives well-prepared, relevant presentations: |
6.6 / 7.0 |
/ 7.0 |
| Explains clearly, answers questions well: |
6.3 / 7.0 | / 7.0 |
| Uses the blackboard and visual aids well: |
6.3 / 7.0 | / 7.0 |
| Enunciates clearly: |
6.2 / 7.0 | / 7.0 |
| Encourages questions, is sensitive to class: |
6.7 / 7.0 | / 7.0 |
| Excites interest and is enthusiastic: |
6.5 / 7.0 | / 7.0 |
| Is friendly and supportive: |
/ 7.0 | / 7.0 |
| Is available outside of class: |
6.2 / 7.0 | / 7.0 |
|
Relevancy |
Length |
Quantity |
Difficulty |
| Exams |
5.8 / 7.0 |
/ 7.0 |
4.2 / 7.0 |
4.7 / 7.0 |
| Exam reviews |
5 / 7.0 |
4.1 / 7.0 |
3.9 / 7.0 |
3.9 / 7.0 |
| Problem sets |
6.2 / 7.0 |
/ 7.0 |
4.2 / 7.0 |
4.2 / 7.0 |
| Papers / Projects |
5.1 / 7.0 |
4.5 / 7.0 |
4.2 / 7.0 |
4.4 / 7.0 |
Required texts / handouts
| Relevancy |
4 / 7.0 |
| Length |
/ 7.0 |
| Interesting |
3.8 / 7.0 |