Uncle Walter Introduction Top Statistics Credits Comments

16.210 Techniques for Structural Analysis and Design

Lecturer: Cesnik
Pre/co requisites: 16.20 Hours From Bulletin: 4-0-8
Response Rate: 26/ Actual Hours: 3.8--6.6

Course Ratings Instructor Ratings
Course Difficulty: / 7.0
Overall Course Rating: 6 / 7.0
Cesnik (L) 6.7 / 7.0
Ortega-Morales (T) / 7.0

16.210 introduces analysis techniques for complex structures including the role of material properties. Material covered includes energy principles, statically-indeterminate structures, matrix and finite-element methods, fracture mechanics, fatigue and design for longevity. Overall, students found 16.210 to be an interesting and useful class. Students felt that Prof. Cesnik was well organized, enthusiastic and cared a lot about the students' success in the course. Students felt that lecture and the problem sets were important in learning the material. There was a wide range in time spent on problem sets and studying, from 4 hours a week to 12 hours a week. Most students did not find the recitation to be very useful, although some did feel it helped them with their problem sets. The 16.20 textbook, a good background in basuc structures and knowledge of Matlab were cited as useful to success in the course. Students did mention that class tended to finish late. The term project received some mixed reviews. Although there were positive comments about the content of the project, students did not like the software package used and they heartily recommended changes in that area. Students also felt that the timing at the end of the term was stressful with the term project and a final, and they recommended both reducing the number of quizzes or problem sets to compensate and starting the term project earlier.

Very well taught, excellent

No more PDE toolbox please!


Course ratings

Subject
was graded fairly: 5.5 / 7.0
was organized and displayed continuity: 6 / 7.0
was well-administered: / 7.0
had accessible lab facilities: / 7.0

Instructor ratings

Instructor Cesnik Ortega-Morales
Gives well-prepared, relevant presentations: 6.6 / 7.0 / 7.0
Explains clearly, answers questions well: 6.3 / 7.0 / 7.0
Uses the blackboard and visual aids well: 6.3 / 7.0 / 7.0
Enunciates clearly: 6.2 / 7.0 / 7.0
Encourages questions, is sensitive to class: 6.7 / 7.0 / 7.0
Excites interest and is enthusiastic: 6.5 / 7.0 / 7.0
Is friendly and supportive: / 7.0 / 7.0
Is available outside of class: 6.2 / 7.0 / 7.0

Exams, problem sets and projects


Relevancy Length Quantity Difficulty
Exams 5.8 / 7.0 / 7.0 4.2 / 7.0 4.7 / 7.0
Exam reviews 5 / 7.0 4.1 / 7.0 3.9 / 7.0 3.9 / 7.0
Problem sets 6.2 / 7.0 / 7.0 4.2 / 7.0 4.2 / 7.0
Papers / Projects 5.1 / 7.0 4.5 / 7.0 4.2 / 7.0 4.4 / 7.0

Required texts / handouts

Relevancy 4 / 7.0
Length / 7.0
Interesting 3.8 / 7.0