|
Indonesia:
Post-Tsunami emergency rebuilding |
Cambodia:
NGO-led slum development |
Zimbabwe:
Financing for housing development |
Peru:
First Sites and Services project |
Project Description |
Community-Based Settlement Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Project
|
Urban Poor Development Fund
|
Housing Finance Project |
Urban Sites and Services Development Project
|
City
Country |
NAD and Nias,
Indonesia
|
Phnom Penh,
Cambodia
|
Harare,
Zimbabwe
|
Lima & Arequipa,
Peru
|
Main Organizer |
World Bank
|
Asian Coalition for Housing Rights
|
USAID
|
World Bank
|
Goals |
Emergency reconstruction
|
Slum upgrading
|
Improve urban living conditions
|
Improve urban settlements
|
Strategies |
Highly bureaucratic network covering all aspects of redevelopment
|
Comprehensive community-driven upgrading
|
Loans and grants for housing
|
Infrastructure development and construction
|
Organization |
National, district and village governments and NGOs
|
Urban poor communities, NGO, Phnom Penh municipality
|
USAID, national government, local building authorities
|
World Bank, national ministries, national bank
|
Staffing |
Government employees and consultants
|
2 local staff
|
USAID and government employees
|
World Bank, government and bank employees
|
Budget |
World Bank, government and bank employees
|
$148,763
|
$75,000,000
|
$43,000,000
|
Source of Funding |
Multiple international donors
|
50% ACHR
40% German NGO
10% Phnom Penh
|
69% USAID loan
31% Zimbabwe contribution
|
50% WB loan
44% local bank
6% beneficiary contribution
|
Units Provided |
50,000 total
44,000 renovated
6,000 new
|
1,145 lots
|
19,359 lots
|
7,200 water and sewage
16,300 electrification
|
Cost Recovery |
None – fully funded by grants and money from other programs
|
31% loan repayment
69% covered by grants
|
67% loan repayment
33% charges and fees
|
67% direct recovery
33% tax revenues
|
Choosing Beneficiaries |
land owner +
home destroyed +
no previous assistance +
bank account
|
community group, not individual +
project proposal
|
Poor +
no home owners
|
Need +
ability to succeed
|
Affordability |
Grants cover costs
|
Checks and balances within community
|
Loans were affordable to the beneficiary
|
Costs = 14% of yearly income
|
Community Involvement |
Some participation, especially when it means free labor
|
Project depends on it
|
Very little; no mention in document
|
Water/san: very little community.
Supervised credit: maintained by community.
|
Project End |
Ongoing
|
Ongoing
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Maintenance |
Unknown
|
Continuing
|
No formal maintenance
|
No formal maintenance
|
Monitoring & Evaluation |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Follows standard agency procedures |
Follows standard agency procedures |