Christoph Reinhart, Tarek Rakha and Dan Weissman (supported by the MIT HASS Fund)
Standard organizations and committees working on building codes and green building standards are typically not frequented by architects. Yet, these committees do more and more influence what performance criteria architects have to design for. This situation is undesirable since there is not feedback mechanism that reports how standard requirements influence design decisions in practice. The ambition of this project is to bring some of the questions raised in committees into schools of architecture, have students and faculty contribute to them in an academic context and to then report the findings back to the standards world.
In 2011 we developed and tested a classroom exercise on daylighting that can serve as an introductory, hands-on exercise in any course or module on daylighting (paper). All you need is a daylit space and a light meter. The space should be deep enough so that there are actually parts of it that occupants might consider to be "non daylit". In the exercise students are first asked to draw the daylit boundary in a space following their intuition and to then conduct a few illuminance measurements. The instructor then plots all student assessments onto a single floor plan and determines the mean daylit area for the space along with a series of daylight simulations. The educational value of the exercise is that the students understand what their personal target illuminance for a given space type is and how their personal approach to daylight compares to current and emerging daylighting metrics. The value for research is that we gain more insight into how well our metrics mimic occupant assessments.