My site underwent a series of topographical, political, economic, and social
changes that continue to shape its role and appearance today. In just over one century,
from the mid 1800s to the late 1900s, forces of industrialization, a rising automobile age
and institutional expansion have come together to form this drastic transformation of my
site (figure 1).
Studying various historical maps and atlases, I have noticed different kinds of
changes on my site such as: land use, density of settlement, ownership, and
transportation. In this paper, I attempt to find physical traces of these changes present in
the current environment, to discover signs and trends that indicate future changes, and to
interpret their significance using photographs, historic maps and atlases.
In 1853, The Grand Junction Railroad was built across the flats to tie Boston to
East Cambridge industries (figure 2). The railroad revolutionized the movement of goods
on my site, making it cheaper and faster to move large quantities of freight.
The railroad has expanded through out the years, starting with one main track in
1853 to an additional three tracks by the year 1916 (figure 3). Factories and storage
warehouses along the Grand Junction Railroad also added railroad spurs connecting them
to the main railroad, allowing shipments to be delivered directly to and from factories and
ensuring that traffic can flow freely along the railroad without blocking traffic flow with
stopped trains.
The Grand Junction Railroad is currently owned by the MBTA and controlled by the MBCR (The Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Company) dispatcher. The railroad remains active nowadays yet sees little to no use due to inactivity in the area as all the factories on site moved out (figure 4). It is mostly used now for carrying scrap either inbound or outbound to the Schnitzer steel scrap yard on the Everett waterfront or freight to the Chelsea Produce Market, and non-revenue transfers of Amtrak and MBTA passenger equipment between the lines terminating at North Station and South Station. [3]
The number of main tracks has thus been reduced from four tracks in 1996 to one main track and a right-of-way track, which is owned by MIT (figure 4). Many of the railroad spurs connecting factories to the main railroad were also removed, as they were no longer in use. Traces of the previous tracks and spurs can still be seen on site as small sections of the tracks remain covered with weed and grass (figure 5), or in some cases, covered with asphalt or gravel (figure 6).
p>
The industrial evolution of my site starts in the early 1800s when Cambridge was
billed as a shipping port. Money was invested heavily in roadways to funnel traffic across
the new bridges between Cambridge and Boston. But the War of 1812 brought a
blockade to the East Coast, hindering plans for Cambridge’s rise as a commercial center.4
The city of Cambridge was left with a grid of roads and vacant spaces in between. By the
late 19th century, Cambridge had plots and streets laid out and the Grand Junction railroad
system, but didn’t have a huge residential population, making it a great area for new
industries to move into.
By the early 20th century, Cambridge was thriving as an industrial town. During
this industrial heyday, many factories and warehouses were built on my site due to its
proximity to the Grand Junction railroad and the large land properties available. By 1930,
My site hosted the main complex of the Whiting Milk Company, the Ward Baking
Company, the National Biscuit Company, John Cain Salad Dressing Company, a Heinz
warehouse, The Metropolitan Storage Warehouse and many more (figure 7).
During the suburbanization in the mid-20th century, many of these factories and warehouses moved out of the city to the suburbs. As a result, many of the buildings on site were destroyed and replaced with newer buildings or converted into parking lots. For example, the Whiting Milk Company, the Ward Baking Company, and the Standard Plate Glass Company all moved out of my site to suburban areas by 1970 (figure 8).
However, there are some buildings that continue to exist today on site. For instance, The Metropolitan Storage Warehouse, which was built in stages starting in 1894, still stands today and is still operating as a storage warehouse, making it the largest and oldest self-storage facility in New England (figure 9).7 Another example is the Paper Goods Company on Albany Street, which was built in the 1922 and most recently renovated in 1998. This building is currently occupied by the Sanofi Aventis US Company, a biotech company (figure 10).
By 1960’s, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has acquired portion of my site as part of MIT campus expansion project for undergraduate housing. Comparing a map of the site today, figure 11, to older historical maps such as 1930 map of Cambridge, figure 6, we notice that many of the industrial buildings originally built on site are were converted to offices or housing spaces for students, as many buildings have been bought by MIT after the factories and warehouses moved out to the suburban areas. For example, the Heinz Storage Warehouse, once stored ketchup and mustard, is now known as building W59 and houses MIT Residential Life Programs, the Office of Campus Dining, and the Housing Office (figure 12). Another example is The Warehouse on Albany Street that has been changed into a graduate dorm.
In addition converting factories and warehouses to offices and dorms, MIT also demolished few buildings and replaced them with research centers and laboratories. For instance, the Whiting Milk Company and the Ward Baking Company were all destroyed and replaced by the MIT Plasma Science & Fusion Center, Francis Bitter Magnet Lab and Nuclear Reactor Laboratory by 1970 (figure 13).
Another more recent example is Simmons Hall on Vassar Street. The dorm was built by Steven Holl in 2002 for MIT undergraduate students. The building is made out of reinforced concrete lined with aluminum panels with more than 3,000 small openings (figure 14). This modern style is in high contrast with the traditional redbrick buildings surrounding it, such as the Sanofi Aventis US Company (figure 15). This is an example of the contrast between the many different layers of time and styles on my site.
The arrival of the automobile brought a gradual change to my site as well. By 1988, few buildings on my site were demolished to make room for parking lots such as the Plywood Warehouse on Vassar St or the Lamb & Ritche Metal Works Company on Albany Street (figure 16). Jackson explains that the car, “even in its primitive form before World War I, could do four times the work of a horse-drawn wagon which took up the same street space”. Hence the addition of the car was a necessity worth tearing a few warehouses to the ground.15
Now the traces of these buildings are left as vacant parking lots. This might be a land-holding strategy by MIT. For example, the David H. Koch Childcare Center on Vassar Street, which was built in 2013, was a vacant parking lot since 1988. Simmons Hall, built in 2002, was also a parking lot since 1996 (figure 17).
In addition to tearing down few buildings and turning them to parking lots, a portion of the railroad connecting Vassar Street and Albany Street was removed in 1996 (figure 17). Maybe Boston & Albany Railroad Company decided that the railroad was no longer the most profitable use of the land and decided to turn it into parking lot as well. The traces of the tracks cannot be seen today as the land has been covered with asphalt and gravel.
By 1996, many factories and warehouses on my site were demolished after the
companies moved to the suburbs and were replaced by parking lots as the automobile age
came rushing in (figure 17). Looking at the site today, we notice that new buildings, such
as student dorms and childcare centers, are replacing these vacant parking lots. This
suggests that this might be a land-holding strategy by MIT as mentioned in previous
section.
There are still many parking lots and vacant land on my site today waiting to be
developed. It is expected to continue observing such a trend as MIT campus is
continuously growing and changing, and there a constant need for student housing and
new laboratories.
Looking at MIT campus map today, figure 18, we also notice that almost all of
the buildings on site are MIT owned buildings now, with the exception of the
Metropolitan Storage Warehouse and the Sanofi Aventis Building. Since the 1960’s,
MIT has been acquiring more and more buildings and vacant land on my site. If such
trend continues, MIT will end up owning my entire site in few years.
In just over one century, from the mid 1800s to the late 1900s, my site has been drastically transformed due to forces of industrialization, a rising automobile age and institutional expansion. By tracing a site’s history through maps, atlases and photographs, and comparing its characteristics, one can get a glimpse into the changes that have occurred over time, such as changes in land use, density of settlements, ownership, and transportation. One can also find physical traces of these changes present in the current environment, such as old train tracks or factories and warehouses, and discover signs and trends that indicate future changes on site, like replacing vacant parking lots with institutional buildings, and to interpret their significance.
1. 1854 Map of Cambridge by H.F Walling: http://ids.lib.harvard.edu/ids/view/7933307?buttons=y
2. 1916 Map of Cambridge, Atlas of the City of Cambridge, Massachusetts by G.W. Bromley and Co.
http://pds.lib.harvard.edu/pds/view/6592027
3.
4. Nidhi Subbaraman, “The Evolution of Cambridge,” The Technology Review (2010), accessed April 10,
2015.
5.1930 Map of Cambridge, Atlas of the City of Cambridge, Massachusetts by G.W. Bromley and Co.
http://www.wardmaps.com/viewasset.php?aid=11
6.1970 Sanborn Atlases of Cambridge:http://sanborn.umi.com/cgi-bin/auth.cgi?command=AccessOK&CCSI=254n
7.http://www.metstorage.com/about-us/
8.http://www.panoramio.com/photo/82371760
9.http://www.biomedrealty.com/uploads/PropertyImages/gallery/270AlbanyStreet617.jpg
10.MIT 2030: http://web.mit.edu/mit2030/framework.html
11.Nidhi Subbaraman, “The Evolution of Cambridge,” The Technology Review (2010), accessed April 10,
2015.
12.1970 Sanborn Atlases of Cambridge:http://sanborn.umi.com/cgi-bin/auth.cgi?command=AccessOK&CCSI=254n
13.http://www.paperny.com/holl/Simmons_Hall_800.jpg
14.http://www.biomedrealty.com/uploads/PropertyImages/gallery/270AlbanyStreet617.jpg
15.Jackson, Kenneth T. Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States (New York: Oxford
University Press, 1985), 183.
16.1988 Sanborn Atlases of Cambridgehttp://sanborn.umi.com/cgi-bin/auth.cgi?command=AccessOK&CCSI=254n
17.1996 Sanborn Atlases of Cambridge:http://sanborn.umi.com/cgi-bin/auth.cgi?command=AccessOK&CCSI=254n
18.MIT 2030: http://web.mit.edu/mit2030/framework.html