|
Migrating from Casetracker to Request TrackerAs we move from Casetracker to Request Tracker as our request tracking system, it’s important to note that Request Tracker is a much more feature-rich and customizable system than Casetracker. However, this also means that migration will not be transparent, and Category owners will need to make certain decisions on how to map current work and Casetracker configurations into the new Request Tracker (RT) environment. You will need to think about your current Category and Subcategory structure, as well as the fields you currently use to manage and track your work. Request Tracker aims to support a much more diverse set of customers than Casetracker, and many things that were global settings in Casetracker, such as software and platform fields, are fully customizable in Request Tracker. This document describes some key differences between Casetracker and RT. Following the key differences is a decision checklist to help you determine how to migrate your Category to RT. The RT development team will also assist you in this process. We hope to make this as painless a process as possible, but you understand your work and the way you use Casetracker better than anyone else, so we will need your help. TermsFirst, some of the terminology in RT is different from Casetracker. Changes in the basic terms are:
A glossary of RT terms and Casetracker equivalents is available on the RT project notebook. Key differencesFieldsRT has the functionality to allow custom fields on a per Queue basis which was not possible in Casetracker. This opens up possibilities to customize queues to better fit the needs of each category owner. For example, some category owners have subcategories in Casetracker that would be better handled as choices in custom fields, as a way of organizing Tickets. Other category owners may need to track unique data not needed by other categories. *CategoriesIn Casetracker, the category/subcategory functionality has been used to serve two purposes:
As mentioned above, the custom field functionality can replace the Category/Subcategory solution. As part of the migration to RT, you’ll need to give some thought as to how your Category/Subcategories should be converted to RT to best serve your needs. Some guidelines are:
ExamplesBelow is a list of examples of converting Categories/Subcategories into RT.
Decision checklistWhat queue or queues do you anticipate needing for your work in Request Tracker? Keeping in mind the differences between Queues and Categories, you may end up with a Queue for some or all of your current Casetracker Categories and Subcategories. We are planning to use the naming convention of a double colon if you need to create a pseudo-hierarchy, i.e., Service Center::Dispatch, Service Center::Security Team, and so on. For each queue, please let us know if you will have a separate group of people working on it, if there are unique requirements for the tickets in that Queue, or if you have some other reason for wanting it separate from your other Queues. Your planned queues:
What custom fields do you think you will want initially to categorize tickets by topic or track other data important to your work? Examples of custom fields are: Topic, Software, OS, Platform, Account number, Type of problem, etc. Your ideas for custom fields in your queues:
Time constraints: Please let us know if you have specific requirements for when you can or cannot deal with a migration from Casetracker to Request Tracker. We will try to meet with each Category owner to discuss the migration, if needed. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||